Copaganda

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged and removed. (July 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help improve it by rewriting it in a balanced fashion that contextualizes different points of view. (July 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (November 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (January 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Copaganda (a portmanteau of cop and propaganda) is propaganda efforts to shape public opinion about police or counter criticism of police and anti-police sentiment.^[1][2]

The term is mostly used in the United States, though also in other countries such as the United Kingdom, the Philippines, and Canada to criticize news media creating one-sided depictions of police, uncritically repeating police narratives, or minimizing police misconduct.^{[citation needed]} It has also been applied to human interest stories and viral videos of cops performing wholesome activities in their communities.^{[citation needed]}

Fictional depictions of police, especially in police procedurals and legal dramas, have been criticized for portraying police as infallible heroes and reinforcing misconceptions about crime rates, minority groups, and police misconduct.^[3][4]

History[edit]

Brenden Gallagher for The Daily Dot cites "saving kittens" stories and "Christmas gift surprise" stunts as "age-old versions of what we’re seeing today" and continues by stating that "Copaganda is so old, you can find it in Nick at Night reruns. The media has been regurgitating police PR since the days of Andy Griffith, and now in the era of Brooklyn 99, it is just being used more often and more effectively."^[1]

Aaron Rahsaan Thomas comments on the history of copaganda in American television: "The past 60 years have seen shows like Dragnet (1951–1959), The Untouchables (1959–1963), and Adam 12 (1968–1975) establish a formula where, within an hour of story, good law men, also known as square-jawed white cops, defeat bad guys, often known as poor people of color." Subsequent shows such as Hawaii Five-O (1968–1980) and Kojak (1973–1978) solidified this narrative, along with Hill Street Blues (1981–1987), Miami Vice (1984–1989), and Cagney & Lacey (1982–1989), which were "for the most part, told from the point of view of white cops occasionally interacting with people of color who were, at best, one-dimensional criminals, colleagues, bosses, sidekicks, and best friends. Even when blackness was not equated with criminality, it was often supplemented by an inhuman lack of depth or presence."^[5]

In 1979, historian E.P. Thompson drew attention to the phenomenon’s British manifestations. He observed a tendency towards the 'populist celebration of the servants of the state' exemplified on British television by the "homely neighbour and universal uncle, Dixon of Dock Green".^[6]

In 2020, following the police murder of George Floyd and the resulting protests, audiences in the US and elsewhere demanded increased attention to how police were portrayed in crime shows and other media. This resulted in the cancellation of some programs such as the reality TV show Cops and A&E's Live PD.^[7][8][9] Activists criticized videos of police officers kneeling with protestors as shallow gestures or performative displays of solidarity,^[10] and some protestors claimed on social media that they were later attacked by the same police.^[11] The media's focus on looting during the protests has also been described as copaganda.^{[citation needed]}

Purpose[edit]

The purpose of copaganda is to sway public opinion for the benefit of law enforcement and redirect attention away from news which may generate a negative image of law enforcement.^[12] In an article for The New York Times on a viral video of a Norfolk Police Department lip-sync battle, reporter Laura Holson describes this as one example in a larger trend of "videos of officers performing [which] have gone viral across the country, as departments step up outreach efforts and seek to improve their image" and characterized it as a "public relations dance." Corporal William Pickering, a public information officer with the Norfolk Police Department, which created the 'Uptown Funk' video stated "it is allowing the country to see us in another way."^[13]

Brenden Gallagher describes that the purpose of copaganda is to win a public relations battle: "If a disproportionate number of articles about the police engaging in 'random' acts of kindness pop up in your feed, while stories about police corruption or abuse are suppressed or go uncovered completely, the public perception of the police eventually looks far different than the reality."^[1] According to an academic study on "Media Power & Information Control: A Study of Police Organizations & Media Relations" for the National Institute of Justice:

Most citizens have little contact with law enforcement officers and their opinion of the police is often formed by the mass media's portrayal of our functions. The maintenance of good press relations is therefore a crucial element of public relations. Officers and employees must maintain good rapport with the media and deal with them in a courteous and impartial manner. It must be remembered that the media has a legitimate function in our society and the public trust of the police can be enhanced through proper dealings with the media (#1098-5). The mission ... is (1) to coordinate the release of accurate and timely information to the news media and the public and (2) to promote the positive image of [the Department]. The goals of [the Department] are to maintain public support ... by keeping the avenues of communication among the department, news media and citizenry open. The objectives ... are to utilize the media when attempting to stimulate public interest in departmental programs involving the community [and to] promote a feeling of teamwork between the police and media (#3800). [Officers shall] assume a pro-active approach in contacting the news media with information about the Department that might not otherwise come to their attention, but is newsworthy (#302.3).^[14]

Ronnie Boyd describes the role of copaganda as an attempt to divert the public's attention from racism and racist policing in America: "stories of Black folx being shot, murdered, sexually assaulted, and harassed by the police have flooded the airwaves since Black folx started building power to draw public attention. Since then, police departments across the country have worked hard to redirect our attention. One of their strategies is 'copaganda.'"^[12] Copaganda media has been shown in a study to reinforce racist misconceptions.^[4]

Examples[edit]

News media are the most common outlets for copaganda, often taking the form of news stories about police officers performing simple tasks that can be construed as laudable by viewers.^[1] Amidst the Ferguson unrest in 2014, a widely circulated news story and photographs of 12-year-old Devonte Hart hugging Portland Police Sergeant Bret Barnum, has been identified by critics as a prominent example of copaganda.^[12] CBS News picked up the story in an article entitled "Amid Ferguson tension, emotional hug goes viral," with its opening line: "It's being called the hug felt 'round the world."^[15]

In 2018, police lip-sync challenges received popular coverage in news media. USA Today called it "the hit social media trend of the summer" and created a bracket for police departments to submit videos of officers lip syncing to be voted on. The article stated that "nearly each of the lip sync videos that hits social media goes viral making everyone (viewer and video-maker alike) a winner."^[16][17]

The National Law Enforcement Museum was described as "straight-up copaganda" in a review of the institution for The Washington Post, stating that it "leans more toward propaganda than education."^[18]

News reporting often discusses police shootings in the passive voice, sometimes using the phrase "officer-involved shooting",^[19] which has been described as a euphemism or a form of copaganda.^[20][21] Such language obscures the role the police played in the interaction being described. In the case of "officer-involved shooting", it obscures how the officer was involved in the shooting.^[22] This practice (also called the "past exonerative" tense)^[23] is discouraged by NPR^[20] and disallowed by the AP Stylebook in 2017.^[22][24]

In February 2023, the city of Toronto spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on a podcast to present a "behind the scenes" view of policing in the city. They engaged a third-party producer to avoid the perception that the program was "copaganda", although the agency retained final say on the content of the podcast.^[25] Reports or media produced by police agencies in Edmonton, Ottawa,^[26] Vancouver,^[27] and in relation to the 2022 convoy protests^[28] have also been described as copaganda.

Copaganda in television[edit]

Marga Buenaventura writing for CNN described The Philippine TV series Ang Probinsyano as copaganda.^{[29][clarification needed]}

Reality shows that present police perspectives with a "bad guy" vs "good guy" narrative such as Cops and Live PD have been identified as a form of copaganda that minimizes the victim's side of the story. Such criticism led to the cancellation of Cops along with similar shows.^[30] Cops was revived afterwards, with new episodes airing on the Fox Nation streaming service,^{[citation needed]} while the Live PD concept returned to Reelz with most of its personnel as On Patrol: Live, which is currently subject to a copyright infringement lawsuit by A&E Networks.^{[citation needed]}

TV franchises such as Law & Order, NCIS and FBI and shows such as Scandal, Major Crimes, Chicago PD, Blue Bloods, Hawaii Five-0, Criminal Minds, Magnum, P.I., S.W.A.T., and Rookie Blue have been described as "copagandic narratives", "outright applaud[ing] police" or "mindless glorification."^[11][12][31] Dick Wolf, the producer of the Law & Order franchise, described himself as "unabashedly pro law enforcement."^[32] In the wake of the protests, calls to cancel copaganda television shows entered the mainstream discourse.^[32]

See also[edit]

• CIA influence on public opinion § Work with entertainment
• Civil-police relations
• Officer Friendly
• Black Lives Matter
• Blue Lives Matter
• Blue wall of silence
• Thin blue line
• Embedded journalism
• Propaganda § Wartime

References[edit]