Template talk:Inspector Gadget

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

WikiProject iconTelevision Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAnimation Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMedia franchises Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Dimadick[edit]

@Dimadick: please provide rationale on why you think this page should be included in WikiProject Science fiction. --Izno (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because parent category Inspector Gadget is a subcategory of Category:Cyborgs in fiction, which is a subcategory of Science fiction themes. Dimadick (talk) 11:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And if I removed the parent category per WP:CAT#T, what then? Also, that is, at-best, a stretch to include a template in that WikiProject. --Izno (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you joking? Have you ever seen Inspector Gadget (1983 TV series), which is all about cyborg adventures and high-tech gadgets? Dimadick (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on content, not contributor. Do those things define science fiction? I find no mention in that article about the seriesm being a science fiction work. That he is a cyborg certainly does not imply science fiction. Even if it did, are you a participant in the WikiProject? Would they agree that this template should be categorized in their set of articles of interest? --Izno (talk) 20:32, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They have included and rated the films based on the series. Dimadick (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you added the template in the case of Talk:Inspector Gadget (film) and at Talk:Inspector Gadget 2. "They" have not included the film, you have. I ask again, since you did not answer the first time: Are you a WP SF participant? --Izno (talk) 12:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you figured out by checking my talk page. I am a participant in no WikiProject, though I edit and tag-several science fiction-related articles. As far as I know, Wikipedia:WikiProject Science Fiction has very few active members. The one I am more familiar with, is User:Fixuture, who has been doing most of the ratings.

Though I tagged the article Inspector Gadget (film) for the WikiProject, I am actually not the one who decided this is a science fiction film. It has been included in category 1990s science fiction films since at least 2010. Check the article history. Last year, I added tags to several films which were part of the science-fiction categories or lists but were never rated by the Project.

I am also not a participant in Wikipedia:WikiProject Film, though I have been working on film articles and categories for several years. Dimadick (talk) 14:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books[edit]

Would it be possible for us to have a section dedicated to books? There's some overview of this at Inspector_Gadget_(franchise)#Books but it hasn't been elaborated on much.

I don't know if any individual books would warrant an article (how many copies need to be sold? or is it based on how much media coverage it gets?) but a series might, if say, the same author did several or they were numbered in a sequence.

The 2011 Viper Comics series compiled into "Gadget on the Orient Express" is pretty interesting but there's other stuff he's made guest appearances in like holiday specials. Ranze (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]