User talk:Apriljennifer

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Apriljennifer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Michael B. Jordan. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaim Sztajer (March 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 02:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Apriljennifer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiAviator (talk) 02:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chaim Sztajer[edit]

Hello, Apriljennifer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chaim Sztajer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rohingya genocide - good topic for you?[edit]

User:Apriljennifer, in working briefly on the Rohingya genocide article and Talk page, I noticed your involvement some time ago, and reviewed your personal User page. Your listed areas of interest appear to nearly all (but the last two) tie in, directly, to major issues in the Rohingya "genocide." In fact, I was quite surprised at how close a match your interests are to the issues in that topic.

Accordingly, I'd encourage you -- time and circumstances permitting (and I realize young people have much on their "to-do" list, especially when attending college) -- to consider becoming more attentive to that (and closely related) articles (e.g.: Rohingya people. This event is the largest modern "ethnic cleansing" crisis, and "genocide" in all of Asia -- with the exception, arguably, of the Uyghur "genocide" recently undertaken by China.

But, unlike the Uyghur persecution, which involves China (and therefore excites the whole English-speaking world), the Rohingya genocide (now in its 4th year) has little fascination for most of the English-speaking world, and is no longer getting the attention that its scale and severity would seem to justify -- at least not on English-language Wikipedia.

Your self-identified interests and skills -- especially if very carefully tempered by a disciplined adherence to the guidelines of WP:NPOV (neutral point-of-view) and WP:RS (reliable sources) -- could be a significant contributor to a global understanding of this complex and pivotal crisis, which significantly involves not only a specific demographic, but whole nations, cultures, religions, and alliances.

Having spent much time on this issue, myself -- and having struggled to document it to Wikipedia standards -- has greatly broadened strengthened my understanding of current global issues (and I've already been an award-winning international affairs scholar, and professional journalist). It's a rugged, and humbling -- but effective -- way to hone one's global awareness, insight, objectivity and understanding, while accomplishing something of global value.

On the Talk:Rohingya genocide page, I've added links to several English-language major-media resources that will help anyone seriously interested in good WP:RS-grade sources and references on the issue. Best of luck, as you grow in knowledge and experience. ~ Penlite (talk) 13:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaim Sztajer has been accepted[edit]

Chaim Sztajer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Good work at Chaim Sztajer. - Hatchens (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Apriljennifer (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never Forget[edit]

Eternal flame
Thank you for your diligent work documenting Chaim Sztajer's life over a two year period. If you ever need an extra set of eyes, advice navigating Wikipedia bureaucracy or help with editing, you can always ping me on my talk page. You may want to check out WP:WikiProject Jewish History

Regards from Berlin, Germany ~ Shushugah (he/him • talk) 20:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kindness and for noticing my hard work on this article! I have an interest in Holocaust history and hope to contribute to more articles on this topic when I have time. April Jennifer (she/her | talk) 04:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs[edit]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Chaim Sztajer, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

g'day[edit]

noticed you have been editing regarding the new census results, please note there is now a change in how all that works... here.

effectively it now is:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ballajura,_Western_Australia&curid=2105631&diff=1100312033&oldid=1095390334&diffmode=source

which in reality= pop = <!-- Leave blank to draw the latest automatically from Wikidata. --> If you find any bugs feel free to let us know at the module talk page. Thanks... JarrahTree 09:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree Thanks. I had not heard about the update. April Jennifer (she/her • talkcontributions) 10:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It would be appreciated if you see others doing the older style maybe you could let them know as well. I do hope the links make sense - JarrahTree 10:14, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thanks for trying the module. I just wanted to let you know that the reason it doesn't show a 2021 population figure yet is because the Urban Centres and Localities (UCL) data for the 2021 Census won't be released until October this year. I realise it's annoying to have a 2016 number until then, but it will automatically change once the new 2021 UCL data is uploaded to Wikidata. We're all waiting impatiently! MaiaCWilliams (talk) 03:15, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @MaiaCWilliams The module is great! I'm keenly going around and updating Melbourne suburb pages with it. I'm noticing the wikidata for most of them is linked to thr SAL, which is already updated. April Jennifer (she/her • talkcontributions) 01:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]