User talk:J.pshine5t

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of space exploration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASI. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Raphaël Liégeois requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Silikonz💬 23:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not contest it as I have no time to create a page for now. Speedy deletion it is, I might create an actual page in a year or two. Thanks for notifying me. CodemWiki (talk) 23:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frutiger Aero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CodemWiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ancient glaciers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes delete it, I moved everything to Category: Past glaciers. CodemWiki (talk) 08:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kansai International Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have mentioned "Launch tower".--I am looking forward to reading more about that in the article about the "Starship system".--Have you thought about the name of a new section, if needed?--I would expect that the Starbase article will get its fair share of relevant updates - from Wikipedia users. 2001:2020:32F:ECE9:5879:240A:DCAB:1A59 (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't thought about the name of a new section yet, but it's true the launchpad/launch tower complex should probably deserve a section of their own. I just remember having to add some info about the launch tower and having to copy paste it on different pages because the topic is so dispatched and right now disorganized. Though wikipedia is group project, you can edit the pages and add sourced info to Starship pages as well, just create an account. Even protected pages are easy to edit just verify your email. CodemWiki (talk) 19:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 23:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axiom Space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Node module.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Turning Wikipedia Green Barnstar
		For tirelessly adding brand-new content to articles related to SpaceX, I award you The Turning Wikipedia Green Barnstar! Cheers! Cocobb8 (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey that is very kind, thanks. CodemWiki (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you until 15 September 2023 at your request. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have a good long wikibreak, CodemWiki. We'll see you in the fall. Cocobb8 (💬 talk to me! • ✏️ my contributions) 17:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Farewell, fellow Spaceflight editor. Redacted II (talk) 19:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bird anatomy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackbird.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your efforts to improve this article. If you have any more edits to make, it'd be appreciated if you'd note that the article names references like "Smith Jones Robinson 2023" rather than ":012" so that other editors can see at a glance which paper is intended. Further (if this applies to you) please check before adding a source that it isn't already defined in the article. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya I see you editing Starship a lot and I wondered if you'd consider changing the Titles from "attempted orbital test flight" to "integrated test flight" since they're not actually attempting orbit (its not really orbital) and that's how they're described by SpaceX themselves.

Attempted isn't needed either since these are iterative flights not operational.

Hope you agree and consider JudaPoor (talk) 11:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of discussion is better on the talk page of the article itself. But you're right, maybe "near-orbital" is a more accurate a word? "Integrated" is already in the title of each articles, so it would be repetitive, while the word "Integrated" itself doesn't evoke anything in particular to average reader, that's probably why we don't use it too much. CodemWiki (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IFT 1/2/etc could also be better.

I feel Orbital and attempt kinda mislead people about the objectives and goals of the tests JudaPoor (talk) 16:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crime scene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crime scene investigation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on SpaceX Starship design process! Have you thought about nominating it for Did You Know? Thriley (talk) 21:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not write the majority of the content of the page (see respective talk page). The content of the page is likely mostly the work of User:CactiStaccingCrane, and it moved between different pages for a while, as it did not really fit it anywhere. So it was bound to become its own page at some point. CodemWiki (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Codem,

I couldn't help but notice that you are a major contributor to the SpaceX articles. I just put a proposal over there at one of the: Starship article talk pages. If you get a chance, I would very much appreciate your opinion on my proposal there.

Thanks,

Lighthumormonger (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick, thoughtful and helpful reply. I've just made my reply to your reply, but I don't know if it's quite as thoughtful or helpful.

Cheers,

Lighthumormonger (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CodemWiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frutiger Aero, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 19:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suspicious death has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CodemWiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frutiger Aero".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi J.pshine5t. Thank you for your work on SpaceX Starshield. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Talk:SpaceX Starshield has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 4 § Talk:SpaceX Starshield until a consensus is reached. Ergzay (talk) 06:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 1 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cars launched into space has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 15:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional mammoths has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 03:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]