User talk:FloorMadeOuttaFloor

Hi FloorMadeOuttaFloor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced production companies or distributors. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respected NinjaRobotPirate, The edit I had made is factually correct, but I will take your advice and search for sources. Also I think replying here, according to me, is more comfortable in my case than to reply on yours. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 13:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MTV Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio Silence. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not leaving a better edit summary with that edit. Anyway, message boards are not considered reliable sources for articles.

Also, to sign your posts, use ~~~~. :) Trivialist (talk) 11:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I can understand what you are saying here,but I will try to find other reliable sources for my edit. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 12:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read through Wikipedia:Reliable sources before you add any more content to Wikipedia. You can't just cite random websites – they must fulfill the our criteria for a reliable source. The IMDb is even listed on that page as an example of an unreliable source. If you have trouble identifying reliable sources, please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources for some links to discussions, and you can ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. WikiProject Film also has a list of sources. We have a lot of advice and essays on these topics, but you'll have to do some reading. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will try to use reliable sources,but I never knew that IMDb is an unreliable source :( . FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 07:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P. S.: Right now I am unable to find any reliable sources on distributors so, could you please suggest some websites that can help? Please reply ASAP :) . FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 07:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office Mojo would probably be the most popular choice. The Numbers sometimes has data for films missing from Box Office Mojo. Any trade magazine would also work, such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and Screen Daily. You could also try TheWrap, Deadline.com, etc. Individual countries often have film archives that you can check, such as the AFI Catalog of Feature Films and British Film Institute. For Europe, there's also Lumiere. In Canada, there's Library and Archives Canada. Check the links I gave you above. NinjaRobotPirate (talk)

Box Office Mojo was actually one of the sources I was coincidentally thinking of. Anyways thanks for clearing my query; I will surely use the mentioned sources. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I appreciate the thanks, and did what I should have done in the first place and checked for reliable sources. They exist. So I reverted to back your version and added one. Thanks in turn. Barte (talk) 07:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, additional thanks to you too for helping :) FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 07:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get that claim that WDSMP distributed Breakthrough and Dark Phoenix? There's no text at the end of the credits other than the TCF logo, and your edits weren't even sourced. Luigitehplumber (talk) 17:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, when I saw these in theatres, the text "Distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures" had appeared at the end. But it somewhat does not appear in later films and is also not mentioned on Box Office Mojo. I will try to find some valid sources and add it again if I find sources as references. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 15:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When adding production companies, the source cited should identify them explicitly as production companies. Not "presented in association with", not "with the participation of", not anything else. Just "production company". template:infobox film is pretty clear about this. That means that if BFI doesn't explicitly list the company as a production company, that company should not be added. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have repeatedly explained this to you. If a company is not explicitly credited as a "production company", you can't add it to the article as such. The next time I see you do this, I'm not going to warn you; I'm going to block you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per Template:Infobox film/doc, if there's a lot of distributors then only one is needed in the infobox, that is, the one where the film is produced. If there's just some, e.g. 2 or 4, then it's fine to include them all, but if it's more than 5 then only one is needed. That's why I've manually undid your edits on Jojo Rabbit. GeraldWL 08:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand what you are trying to say here, but also, as per WP:FILMDIST, a film's domestic and international distributors can be mentioned. However it does not state so for films made by more than one country, so it's difficult to really say whether that edit should stay on the page or not. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wuthering Heights (2011 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thwaite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rogue City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaumont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to revert edits at one time, read Wikipedia:Twinkle#Quick info, so That you won't spam edits. Also, if you don't know how to revert with Twinkle in Mobile view, either ask the Teahouse or go to desktop view and press restore edit. LooneyTraceYT comment • treats 21:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just got the word BTW that You can't edit with Twinkle in Mobile View, so use the desktop view for now. LooneyTraceYT comment • treats 23:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I took your advice and started using Twinkle, and it works surprisingly well. I would like to thank you for your really useful suggestion, I will continue using Twinkle in the future as well. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 03:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the edit on The War with Grandpa, Universal actually distributed that film internationally but I understand your revert on it, though. --TheRavineStudios (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am trying to find a source saying Universal was involved with the film, so far I haven't found any, but I'll continue searching for a source. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 11:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok dude, gotcha. --TheRavineStudios (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does this work? It mentions Universal here, so...

Link: https://www.classification.gov.au/titles/war-grandpa TheRavineStudios (talk) 16:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this does mention Universal, but I am still unsure whether this is a reliable source so I'll see if this is a reliable source as soon as possible. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 04:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. TheRavineStudios (talk) 07:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I checked Box Office Mojo and it shows that distributors vary in territories worldwide, so that makes it a bit uncertain whether Universal was involved with this film in most territories or not. But I am still researching about this so don't you worry. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 07:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He's been blocked for a month now, so there's no need to worry about PAW Patrol: The Movie that much anymore. Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 21:09, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's pretty great. Now I guess I don't have to revert that guy's edits again and again. That's a relief. Thanks for telling me so. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 03:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reported him, but if you want to report somebody else, go to this link. Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 11:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add details not found in the cited source, such as in this edit. If you've got a source for this stuff, please cite it. You seem to be very keen on adding every company that you think has worked on a film. That is commendable enthusiasm and thoroughness. However, Wikipedia is based on what reliable sources say, not our own research. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I will take your advice and stop doing so, but what about other editors, including LTPHarry, who do so? FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 05:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where does this source say that Focus Features and Dimension are production companies for They (2002 film)? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well it does mention the companies are involved with the film, see the end of the article. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 02:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But where does it say that they are production companies? Have I not explained this well enough yet? It doesn't matter if they were "involved" in some way. They have to be explicitly labeled as production companies to be listed in the "production company" parameter of the infobox. The "presented by"/"presentation of" credit is usually a distributor. The reason why template:infobox film says to include a citation where the production company is explicitly labeled is because people engage in this kind of guesswork – "I saw their logo/name listed somewhere, and I think they're probably a production company". The next time I see you add poorly sourced production/distribution company, I'm just going to block you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well. Next time I will try to put reliable sources for any articles of Wikipedia. But the problem about it is: What can be done to list and detail the movies that weren't produced or made by StudioCanal? I'm talking about movies made during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. Do I have to create a new section about that in the StudioCanal article or what? Because the truth is these films are owned by StudioCanal.

1. Movies from the defuncted DEG (De Laurentiis Entertainment Group) formerly named AVCO Embassy Pictures:

a) The Graduate

b) The Fog

c) Escape From New York

d) The Howling (film)

e) Raw Deal (1986 film)

f) Manhunter (film)

g) Evil Dead II

2. Movies from the defuncted EMI Films, the defuncted subsidiary of Thorn EMI:

a) The Deer Hunter

b) Highlander (film)

3. Movies from the defuncted Carolco Pictures formerly named Anabasis Investments

a) First Blood (film)

b) Rambo: First Blood Part II

c) Angel Heart

d) Red Heat (1988 film)

e) Rambo III

f) Lock Up (film)

g) Air America (film)

h) Total Recall (1990 film)

h) Jacob's Ladder (1990 film)

In the back of the DVD and Blu-Ray covers of those movies. As well as going to the official website of StudioCanal. Here I send you the Blu-Ray.com website links to check the back of some DVD and Blu-Ray covers of these mentioned movies that are owned by StudioCanal and it appears the Copyright symbol along the word StudioCanal/Canal+, that means StudioCanal is the real owner of these mentioned movies, and also the IMDB links to check the company credit of these mentioned movies owned by Studiocanal to check the StudioCanal name in the section all world wide, that it means distribution and ownership of Studiocanal; and finally, the link of StudioCanal website description of these mentioned movies

1. The Graduate:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Graduate-Blu-ray/323/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Graduate-Blu-ray/90213/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-graduate-1967/

2. The Deer Hunter:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Deer-Hunter-Blu-ray/206572/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Deer-Hunter-4K-Blu-ray/206573/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-deer-hunter-1978/

3. The Fog 1980 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/The-Fog-DVD/1073/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Fog-Blu-ray/61747/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-fog-1980/

4. Escape From New York:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Escape-from-New-York-DVD/21606/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Escape-from-New-York-Blu-ray/109611/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Escape-from-New-York-Blu-ray/12117/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/escape-from-new-york-1981/

5. The Howling 1981 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/The-Howling-DVD/130843/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Howling-Blu-ray/25056/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-howling-1981/

6. First Blood:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/First-Blood-DVD/1881/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/First-Blood-Blu-ray/61/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/First-Blood-4K-Blu-ray/214055/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083944/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/first-blood-1982/

7. Rambo: First Blood Part II:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Rambo-First-Blood-Part-II-Blu-ray/735/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Rambo-First-Blood-Part-II-4K-Blu-ray/214054/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/rambo-first-blood-part-ii-1985/

8. Rawl Deal 1986 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Raw-Deal-Blu-ray/11210/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091828/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/raw-deal-1986/

9. Highlander 1986 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Highlander-Blu-ray/14653/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Highlander-Blu-ray/141901/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091203/companycredits https://www.studiocanal.com/title/highlander-1986/

10. Manhunter 1986 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Manhunter-DVD/30811/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Manhunter-Blu-ray/17595/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/manhunter-1986/

11. Angel Heart:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Angel-Heart-Blu-ray/6864/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/angel-heart-1987/

12. Evil Dead II:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Evil-Dead-II-DVD/145507/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Evil-Dead-2-Blu-ray/27439/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092991/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/evil-dead-ii-1987/

13. Red Heat 1988 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Red-Heat-DVD/6311/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Red-Heat-Blu-ray/6760/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Red-Heat-4K-Blu-ray/249618/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095963/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/evil-dead-ii-1987/

14. Rambo III:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Rambo-III-DVD/18895/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Rambo-III-Blu-ray/736/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Rambo-III-4K-Blu-ray/214053/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/rambo-iii-1988/

15. Lock Up film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Lock-Up-Blu-ray/11357/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/lock-up-1989/

16. Total Recall 1990 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Total-Recall-DVD/1737/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Total-Recall-Blu-ray/85/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Total-Recall-4K-Blu-ray/257346/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/total-recall-1990/

That’s all i have to say. Ivo Reátegui (talk) 19:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, StudioCanal is the owner of these films, but the main reason why I reverted your edits was because-

1. StudioCanal has a section named "Selected films produced by StudioCanal or associated companies", where you made some edits. The films mentioned were made by neither StudioCanal nor any associated company (StudioCanal owns only the films given or the library of a particular company, not the companies which produced/distributed a film now owned by StudioCanal).

2. Due to the same reason, these films cannot go in the "List of StudioCanal films" page as well.

I hope you understand now why I reverted your edits. Also, sorry for having responded to your message a little late, not everyone has spare time to reply to messages. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 08:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the missing references that I made on Vice (2018) on a genre change that you deleted a couple of days ago and re-added the original genre edit. I would like to thank you for removing the change in the first place, I always like feedback and since as you saw, I often forget references so the more times people tell me about missing references in my edits, the better I become as an editor. NSNW (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I saw the references added for the genres, so I'll let them be for now. Also, people forget things at times, even I do, so it's fine, happens. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 03:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be inserting [[Affirm Films#Pure Flix|Pure Flix Entertainment]] into the "distributor" field of a number of films. If you follow that link, you'll find that Affirm Films's Pure Flix is a video-on-demand service, not a film distribution company, and that they only gained even that recently, so it was not there to distribute for the listed films. Please undo your edits and restore the link to Pure Flix Entertainment. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I thought Affirm Films acquired the streaming service and the film studio as well. Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will undo my edits. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 05:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already reported THAT editor to AIV, and they've been blocked now. Crboyer (talk) 05:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thankfully, the block is indefinite. But I would suggest that their email access be disabled since they have also been threatening me over email. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 05:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked the blocking administrator to look into it. Crboyer (talk) 05:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I just want to give this out. On the page of Dark Castle Entertainment, it says that they were involved with Dragon Eyes and Stash House, and even says so on the respective articles, however they do not appear on the posters, and I believe that is completely unsourced info. TheRavineStudios (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I am uncertain about this. Even the articles for the aforementioned films state Dark Castle as a production company, and Joel Silver seems to have produced the films as well. I'll tally with some sources and get back to you. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 09:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems it's half true. This article on Screen Daily says Dark Castle and After Dark had a home video deal which included Dragon Eyes and Stash House. But, neither Dark Castle nor Silver Pictures made the films (as a production company), as I have found out from Variety, so I am thinking of removing info about that from the articles for the aforementioned films. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 09:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude. TheRavineStudios (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The person legally named Ye is still generally known as Kanye West, so that's what we use in the article. Please see WP:COMMONNAME and Wikipedia:Official names for more information on this. -- The Anome (talk) 14:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! In this edit you inserted a ref BOM, seemingly without defining it, which gives a cite error. See the reference section for the error. I don't know much about this film and intent of your edit, so I can't fix it myself. But perhaps two sources would be already enough? Cheers, --Ivla (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Oops! Clumsy old me; I visited the page where I had made that edit and rectified it. Anyway, thanks for reminding me of this error, and I'll try being more careful when adding references to pages. Kudos! FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 03:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Could you please help me understand why you reverted BattyBot's recent edit to List of Universal Pictures films (2020–2029)? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I did not want to revert your bot's edit to the page but was rather forced to. The issue was that an editor (whose name I am not mentioning in this reply) added some films to the list which are still in development and have not entered production as of yet. Per WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL, only films confirmed by reliable sources to have begun principal photography are to be listed in a list of films for the current decade made by a particular studio. As a result, I had to revert the user's edit. However, an edit by your bot came in the way and because the edit the user made was quite huge and I was unable to manually revert it, I was forced to revert your bot's edit before I could revert the user's edit. I hope you get my point about why I had to revert your bot's edit. Thank you for your time. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 15:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FloorMadeOuttaFloor: Thanks for your quick reply. Next time, feel free to redo the bot's edit after completing your reversions, or just drop a note in the edit summary when you revert the bot's edit so the bot operator knows it's OK to redo the edit. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 16:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PVR Pictures logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is what I've added to the Seabiscuit and Bruce Almighty pages okay? I didn't add anything to the infobox on the former page because of the fact that the distribution was a three-way tie between Universal, DreamWorks and Spyglass, but the latter was fine because Spyglass handled all international sales.

But I'm asking if I cluttered the pages a bit too much because I think I may have done so. Luigitehplumber (talk) 00:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly speaking, I don't see any clutter on these two pages, especially the information in the Release section, which I feel is sufficient. I would however suggest a minor change to the Bruce Almighty edit (thank you for making those changes by the way).

The Variety article cited states, "Spyglass Entertainment is reteaming with Universal Pictures to co-finance and handle foreign distribution on its upcoming Tom Shadyac-helmed comedy “Bruce Almighty.”" On the basis of this information, I suggest the term "Worldwide" be changed to "International" instead as the latter would mean they distributed worldwide outside the U.S. and Canada while the former suggests they distributed worldwide including the U.S. and Canada. Hope this helps. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 10:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Luigitehplumber (talk) 12:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PVR Cinemas logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, FloorMadeOuttaFloor, can you remove the second "owned by MGM itself", add the "and" next to the "Electric Dreams", and place both of them next to the "owned by MGM itself via Orion Pictures"? 24.114.27.103 (talk) 10:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About that, I once saw the back of a Blu-ray of the film from Second Sight Films and the copyright on it was registered to MGM itself, the main reason why I didn't place it in the "owned via Orion Pictures" category. Hope this helps. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 11:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad. Can you remove the second "owned by MGM itself" category, add the "and" word, place both this and the "Electric Dreams" category next to the first "owned by MGM itself" category, and replace the "via Orion Pictures" category with the "with ownership of the former handled through Orion Pictures" category on the Turner Entertainment Co. catalog via the pre-May 1986 MGM library, remove the "pre-1959" category on the RKO Radio Pictures library, add the minority stake of the Spyglass Media Group catalog to the list, and add the "(49%)" and "film" categories to the Flagship Entertainment Group catalog at List of libraries owned by Warner Bros. Discovery? 24.114.36.38 (talk) 01:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made minor fixes regarding Electric Dreams on that page and the one for MGM, don't see any other problem; RKO distributed films on its own till 1959 and any films after are all co-prods owned by their original distributors, Warner-Flagship co-productions are owned by Warner and Spyglass' films are mostly owned by their original distributors (Four Christmases from New Line and Invictus are owned by Warner). FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 07:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24.114.27.103 is evading a block, and has now been rangeblocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros. owns a 49% stake of Flagship Entertainment Group. Please add the "49%" and "film" categories to the Flagship Entertainment Group catalog at List of libraries owned by Warner Bros. Discovery. 24.114.38.187 (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Coyote vs. Acme, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. When you add a new fact to Wikipedia, please cite the published source where you found it. See WP:V. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year. I don't like to spoil it, but that KikoRiki vandal has came back re-adding Team Invincible to List of American films of 2012 and all international versions of Wikipedia. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, just great. Well, I'm a bit busy in real life as well but just know I'm still there keeping a watch on this nuisance and will take action wherever possible and necessary. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 06:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	Sundance Barnstar
	Thanks for working on the Sundance film article Ibelin (film)~ Fuzheado | Talk 19:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 28 Days Later, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew MacDonald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gasoline Rainbow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mubi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]