User talk:SNAAAAKE!!

Thanks for the sources. I guess SNK's artists think Garou Terry was made to be cooler than regular Terry. This is not the first time they said that. In an article related to KOF 12, the staff said they wanted to reuse the original "macho" Terry rather than Garou's one. I guess it's similar to Kyo's redesigns where he starts wearing stylish costumes rather than the classic bancho school uniform often seen in many series like Jotaro Kujo from Jojo.Tintor2 (talk) 15:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King Arthur and the Knights of Justice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Hildreth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to create an article for Trish (Devil May Cry). Feel free to add anything.Tintor2 (talk) 16:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Malarkey such as creating grotesquely overdetailed articles on game characters over a redirect that has been agreed on in a wiki community discussion is the kind of behavior that , if persisted with, gets you 'blocked'.TheLongTone (talk) 13:54, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are cruising for a bruising. Grow up, as quickly as you can.TheLongTone (talk) 14:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please cease your random vandalism and random rants on people's talk pages. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 14:05, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism my curvy pink. It's not a random rant; you, however, are a disruptive editor.TheLongTone (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The entire "wiki community discussion" was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Soulcalibur_characters#Siegfried's_article? and now revert vandalism and remove your post here before I have you reported. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 14:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After further vandalism on an article that has been completed for years (namely for 7 years): [1] I now reported you. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 17:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should check up on what constitutes vandalism. And if you have reported me to the admins, I would point out that it is the done thing to notify the person you have dobbed in.TheLongTone (talk) 12:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. categorize only in article space PRehse (talk) 20:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SNAAAAKE!! - I'm not sure if you figured out what triggered the warning so if not, it was repetitive categorization - wait until the article is moved into mainspace and then add the categories. I didn't realize it would trigger such a warning, either. 😊 ^{Atsme📞📧} 18:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ADDING: My mistake - the article being moved into draft space is what caused it - I had it backwards. ^{Atsme📞📧} 19:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How to fix a transpared-background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Siegfried_(Soulcalibur).png showing up as white background at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siegfried_and_Nightmare ? SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 02:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like feathering caused the washed edges when the image was removed from the background. Scale back the feathering to 1 or 2 px — I assume you’re using the oval tool as well?? ^{Atsme📞📧} 19:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're sou're so confused that you even writing in a wrong section here. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 11:12, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SNAAAAKE!!, if you ever feel like another editor is making a wrong edit, or that you are being unfairly treated, please ping Atsme, myself or seek relevant project/noticeboard for advice before getting too involved. You have been doing good work, I would like to see it continue. Alex Shih (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Alex - I’m traveling and unable to look into this issue the way it should be, but I did see above that the editor who provoked SNAAAAKE!! needs to seek other alternatives for resolution as he was advised to do by Mrz7 as evidenced in this diff.. I have asked SNAAAAKE!! to disengage, and I am working with Nikkimaria trying to get the ce done, and helping as I can with the articles SNAAAAKE!! has worked so hard on to prepare for GAC/FAC. We welcome all productive collaboration but unfounded provocation makes it difficult to keep things collegial. ^{Atsme📞📧} 18:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

redo ping as user name was misspelled above - Mz7 ^{Atsme📞📧} 18:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, left [2] asking for an apology, seems didn't get it still after few days. (The pic's fine now.) --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 18:23, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meh - let’s stay focused on getting the articles to GA and not worry about distractions. How did you fix the pic? ^{Atsme📞📧} 21:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I don't even want any GAs anymore just to make this properly written especially as it's highly popular right now [3] (right now = for a year or so) due to the huge popularity of Fate Grand Order. I didn't do anything with the pic myself. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 08:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed this edit on Beemer69's talk page, and was wondering if you'd like to discuss the article before I renominate it for FAC. What exactly is it you want to "share", sources or comments? Thanks. Homeostasis 22:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I'm supposed to be arguing with any ideologues on the terms of my, um, probation. Especially since even unprovoked they've already attacked me by name right there. But I've got a plenty of sources from old magazines, others who are seriously into Resi have all these Capcom books and stuff. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 08:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, SNK is releasing a fighting game centered around most of their female characters. Considering she is in the cover, I wondered if Kula might be able to surpass WP:Notability. I know some sources that talk about her creation (concept, appearance intention, gameplay in KOFXIII, and her redesigns for Maximum Impact). Den of Geek also listed her as one of the best KOF characters but I couldn't find much more reception information. In case you are interested, I'm willing to help. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

King, but good luck finding stuff for her with searches. Better update and expand articles like King of Fighters, where most KOF games aren't even mentioned. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 04:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Made some a sandbox here. There there would be more sources for SNK Heroines considering how controversial it is.Tintor2 (talk) 16:01, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care about any western woke "journalists" clutching pearls for virtue signalling and clicks. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 16:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but it would add at least more notability similar to that R. Mika article. I mean, do you think the two paragraphs of the current sandbox can make it pass notability?Tintor2 (talk) 16:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not worth it. Really better for example fix the KOF article that doesn't even mention most games from the last decade and half, also make articles about the recent mobile games that are very popular in China (using Chinese and Japanese sources, because you can't count on western "game journalists" to report on video games). --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Still, it might be hard to create Eastern-only games because the sources would be impossible to read. Even the SNK Wiki's articles barely have content about them.Tintor2 (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use website translation services. Google Chrome even automatically does if enabled, using their own Google Translate. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 16:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two games very popular right now are SNK's own The King of Fighters: World and Tencent's The King of Fighters: Destiny. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 16:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Slayers SFC gameplay.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to highly expand the reception section from Athena Asamiya but I'm worried about Yuri Sakazaki's notability. If you found sources for her, I would appreciate it and add them to the article. I was also thinking of having an article for Leona Heidern but it seems there are not many sources besides some articles from Den of Geek. Cheers and happy editing.Tintor2 (talk) 22:33, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Excalibur: A Novel of Arthur, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Maiden Castle and Derfel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I gave the wrong guideline for retaining BCE dates in the Circle article. It is MOS:ERA, backed by MOS:DATERET, which reads in part: "The date format chosen by the first major contributor in the early stages of an article should continue to be used". Please don't start an edit war. Sweetpool50 (talk) 17:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia as a whole uses 480 BC, not "480 BCE". SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 02:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines leave creators free to choose which era is appropriate to an article. Circe was a 'pagan' goddess and her ancient representations fall within an era well before Christianity even existed, therefore Common Era dating fits better in that context. Just appealing to use on "Wikipedia as a whole" is meaningless without taking rationale for use into consideration. Sweetpool50 (talk) 09:59, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did Spanish game reviews research and found more reception about KOF character Kula Diamond so I decided to try a new article. Feel free to add anything.

Also, Trish (Devil May Cry) managed to become a GA but feel free to correct anything. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heishiro Mitsurugi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Phoenix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just a week ago I created a new table as an idea on the Soul Calibur talk page. Unfortunately, no one has yet answered, whether this idea is good or if there is something negartive. Could you please have a look. I do not want to change the table on the main page without a vote. ---TheKerberos01, 01:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Soulcalibur_characters#New_character_table

I refer to your edits at Sheva Alomar. Please read MOS:SURNAME. "After the initial mention of any name, the person should generally be referred to by surname only". Accordingly, I'm going to revert all your changes of 'Redfield and Alomar' to 'Chris and Sheva'. This was one of many issues in the article I had to fix at this article before I was able to successfully nominate it for GA. Please don't ever change surnames to first names at any article. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 10:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also please read MOS:ALLCAPS; don't put references in all capital letters (Such as: 'TOP5 HATED CHARACTERS (THAT YOU WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO HATE)' even if that's how it appeared in the original source. Thanks. Damien Linnane (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very concerned by your addition of the extremely long quote by voice actress Karen Dyer. So as you no doubt would have noticed I took it upon myself to 'adopt' several of the articles you had written after you were blocked. As I worked on your articles I was continually impressed by your ability to find information and your attention to detail, however, was also quite frankly mortified by your inability to format references, tell the difference between reliable and non-reliable sources, and also your need to add insane amounts of trivial over-detail. This new quote by Dyer is an example of the latter. It's the kind of over-detail I had to remove before I could get any of the articles you had worked on to GA level. I mean, you've added seven sentences of quotes, but I don't see a single thing of value in any one of them. "I think she is also driven, heart-wise"; how is that helpful to the reader? The only thing I see as being useful to the reader is the opening sentence about her training to use firearms. Personally I'd delete every single one of those seven sentences. Perhaps you could have a one sentence summary of Dyer's thoughts on Alomar (though personally I wouldn't even add that). Damien Linnane (talk) 11:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it's Sheva not "Alomar". In both the official and the common use, as in the case of all RE protagonists. I'm really "mortified" more by that. The article could be as well named "Sheva (Resident Evil)", you know? Just like Sophitia Alexandra's article is just Sophitia, it's very common in video games that surnames are just unimportant. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 11:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Copying from my talk page since you're replying here as well now) I understand the term Sheva is used much more frequently than Alomar, but that doesn't change the fact the Alomar is her last name. As per MOS:SURNAME, that's how we format names on Wikipedia. It's exactly the same for film plots. I was told to change all the instances of 'Chris and Sheva' to 'Redfield and Alomar' before Resident Evil 5 could become a good article. I'm 100% they would have brought up the issue of last names at the FAC if they hadn't already been formatted properly. Damien Linnane (talk) 11:29, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also Sophitia isn't a good article, Sheva Alomar is, and RE5 (which also calls her Alomar) is featured, so I think that's a very poor comparison. I'd be happy to raise the issue at Project Video Games and accept whatever consensus is reached there. Damien Linnane (talk) 11:36, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewers were simply wrong. It happens, people being clueless about things. The surname of Sheva is even (and much) less important than, for example, the surname the horror monster Jason (nominally "Jason Voorhees", and there is actually some importance to it due to his mother, but it's just Jason, including in his FA Jason Voorhees where "Jason" goes over 400 times and "Voorhees" less than 40). SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's a new full body image of Leon from RE2 remake [4] for the replacement of its infobox. FairlaneIsPangit (talk) 08:28, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you are good with uploading image. I've been trying to upload two images for the infobxes of Shinya Kogami and Akane Tsunemori but they end up with a black background. Can you check those two to upload images with better background? Happy editing.Tintor2 (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Akane_(Psycho-Pass).png Fix the source for where was it from originally. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 18:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chechen wolf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ichkeria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SNAAAAKE!!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chun-Li concept arts.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you have been editing that article so I thought this site might help you. It has a lot about the character.Tintor2 (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Tekken characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holy Grail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays!
	Wishing you much joy & happiness now and every year!! Merry Christmas - Happy Hanukkah‼️ When does New Year’s Day come before Christmas Day? Every year! What do you call a bankrupt Santa? Saint Nickel-less. 🔔🎁⛄️🎅🏻Atsme✍🏻📧 21:01, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_December_20#Template:Infobox_Mortal_Kombat_character. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SNAAAAKE, let's discuss this, ok? There are always work-arounds when consensus decides to change something. If you believe you have a convincing argument to oppose the proposed change, then let's present your argument calmly. I'm watching your TP, and ask that you please not respond anymore at the RfC. If anything, I hope you will strike the comments you made that were directed at editors and not content. Ok? The proposal also stated that the 3 unique fields this template has could either use the custom fields available at Template:Infobox character or be merged into the template itself and be available directly. So you're really not losing the important template parameters, they are being merged into a single template. Perhaps there can be an additional parameter that designates what you need it to do for the video game character? ^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 19:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to say "OK, I'm finished there. It's not that I'm even going to prevail obviously." but now the new excellent idea is to delete everything that matters in this case as "trivia" to be replaced by actual trivia. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 20:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I figured you were - you've done so well in this topic area, and I am so impressed with the wonderful work you've done/been doing. I'm trying not to appear patronizing but as I've expressed to you in the past, I've been a fan of your writing from the get-go, and continue to be so it's probably a bit selfish on my part to want to keep you editing. PS: There was a King Arthur movie on DirecTV last night, and I thought of you and the wonderful work you've done on WP. How about this - let the RfC run its course, and then we can discuss some of the parameters you need to maintain the "historic format" or whatever it is you want to keep? Infoboxes are...well...see Wikipedia:Tarage's Law. 😂 ^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 20:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really, "a fan"? That's oh, wow, thank you! Anyway, I just had prove that a fighting style is actually of importance for a *fighting* game character. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Understood - it will all work out...patience, my Wikifriend. ^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 22:15, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Witchaven II: Blood Vengeance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ken Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 20:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 17:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What would be a better order: |weapon=, |fighting_style= or the other way around? --Gonnym (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The way it was, was fine. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 01:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arthur's Quest, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. If you want to delete the redirect, nominate it at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. —teb728 t c 07:53, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's the title of the completely unrelated film https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0155508/ SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 09:24, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for your edits. Please remember that it makes it easier for others to collaborate with you on the encyclopedia if you preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 12:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've been temporarily incapacitated because of a pinched nerve in my left shoulder, so I spent the day resting, and watching Season 1 of The Adventures of Merlin on Netflix. It made think of the wonderful work you've been doing in that same topic area. ^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 00:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to say cool, but there's not much cool with health problems. Get well soon! SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 13:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update - I actually have been working on the lead for Mordred but so far nothing has transferred from my brain to the keyboard. Good thing there's no deadline. I didn't want you to think I forgot. ^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 01:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Maleagant does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Can you really not be bothered to edit in a collaborative spirit? Eric ^talk 03:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 04:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Gaheris does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Eric ^talk 14:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I imagine your focus is 100% on writing good prose/content when you're editing articles. I understand because that's what I try to stay focused on as well. As a result, I tend to forget to write an edit summary before I save the edit. Unfortunately, edits without an edit summary are an impediment to other editors for various reasons. To remedy my shortfall, I went to User Preferences, then to Editing, scrolled down to Editor, and checked Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Clear your cache, and you will be reminded by a pop-up to add the much needed edit summary. It certainly helped me. ^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 15:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dead or Alive 6, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Raidou and Marie Rose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on the Fate articles and created two. For Kiritsugu, I found this image that shows his body better than the current one. Could you please change it to show only his body rather than the background too? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SNAAAAKE!!. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

NOTE: I cannot impress upon you enough to use edit summaries, especially when you are merging material from one article to another, and even more so when you are blending them into various sections as you did at Circe. See WP:MERGE "When performing a merger, one should remember to reconcile talk pages, and to attribute copied content, as required by Wikipedia's license. At minumum, this means adding words "Merged content to/from page" to edit summaries." Further how-to instructions follow on that page. If you have not activated the edit summary reminder feature in your user preferences, please do so after you read this note. ^Atsme 📣 📧 11:16, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Eric ^talk 11:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SNAAAAKE!!. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 18:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

^Atsme 📣 📧 18:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROSPLIT contains the procedure for proposing a split. You need to create a descriptively-named section on the talk page and generate a cogent proposal for what sections you are proposing to split (and to where). I suggest starting a new section, since the one you referenced here isn't off to a great start. VQuakr (talk) 16:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with VQuakr for the most part; however, it is sometimes better to get a temperature reading of the local article watchers first. I weighed-in with stats but won't be going back. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 18:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They're literally about the only people in the whole wide world that use this nickname (was never the real name) anymore, and they do it for both the historical ISIS (yet not the previous ISI) and the current IS. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 19:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SNAAAAAKE!! ! Thank you for helping to report vandals! That's really helpful to all of us. However, some people may take offense at the edits you made here. Please take note WP:CIVIL is an official policy that states all editors must behave civilly during discussions and avoid insults and personal attacks. Regards, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 10:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SNAAAAKE!!. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

^Atsme _Talk 📧 00:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:El Viento.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know books by this author, and he also often appears on various talk shows. I also happy to see you around. But I am kind of busy with real life things. Happy editing! My very best wishes (talk) 04:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there SNAAAAKE!! (talk · contribs). I noticed your edits to World of Tanks, and while I appreciate your work done to the article, I noticed the lack of edit summaries in your edits. Please provide an edit summary when submitting edits to Wikipedia, as they help other editors traverse and understand the edit history of an article. If you continue to do this - evident as other users have posted years ago about your lack of edit summaries - then at the very least, please consolidate your edits. Thank you.

Oh, and please remain civil in the World of Tanks talk page. Your latest addition to the talk page speaks like an insult. — BladeRikWr 14:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you wrote the Hadouken article. Not sure if anything in this is useful to further expand it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 00:07, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add what you want. I wanted to restore Shoryuken too but it's salted (actually Shoryuken (website) would be nice too). SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 09:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samurai Shodown (2019 video game), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jotamide (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adrian Chmielarz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Video game director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shaving down the infobox to game-only portrayals was suggested during my process of getting Ermac to GA status in order to avoid clutter. But yeah, the edit was kinda out of nowhere, so apologies for that. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 15:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portions can be set as collapsed. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Snake, aren’t you on a 1RR restriction? It looks like you’ve violated it multiple times over at Quiet’s article? Pinging Atsme. Sergecross73 msg me 21:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained at [5] (where there was no reply contesting it) plus [6] now (different arguments/approach actually). There was also kinda Chernobyl (miniseries) where people kept removing my improvement tags until I've given up (but they're in wrong). SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in the editorial you’ve written on that talk page you linked to addresses whether or not you’re both under, and violated, a 1RR editing restriction. Sergecross73 msg me 21:57, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SNAAAAKE!!, it doesn't matter who is right or wrong, what matters is who gets caught in the 3RR revert trap or worse - DS and 1RR. Unfortunately, your prior history places you at a disadvantage but you CAN/HAVE overcome that obstacle by stepping back and taking the advice of others who share your goals in getting the article right. When you find yourself in a squeeze, you can email me and/or ask questions on my TP where helpful (talk page stalker) can also weigh-in. You are too valuable a contributor to get caught in the web of reverts. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 22:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just saying I'm discussing on talk pages (and began before it came to attention). You can revert me if you want, or either just go and see if I'm right (or not). SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 22:07, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Sergecross73 msg me 22:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block, which represents your last chance

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for violating your 1RR restriction. I was 50-50 on going with an indef, but I'm going to err on the side of leniency and give you one last chance. I suggest you listen closely to your mentor and tread as lightly as humanly possible. No more missteps. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OK, can I have it reset to 3? It's been like 1 year or something. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 22:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to bring that up with the admin that applied the restriction first. If that fails, you can bring it to wider admin review. El_C 22:25, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

El C - your block resulted in an (edit conflict) as I was hitting publish changes. That was a hair trigger block at ANI - which is not 3RR or AE. Wow. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 22:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What can I say — I'm swift! El_C 22:45, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

😂 ^Atsme _Talk 📧 23:07, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm OK with a timeout actually. I spend way too much time here lately. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me about it! El_C 22:43, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your leniency, El C. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 23:07, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SNAAAAKE!! - remember, patience is a virtue. I was reading some of the back and forth at Talk:Quiet (Metal Gear) and it inspired me to ask if maybe there is enough coverage of "oversexualization of women in video games" for you to create an article? Whenever you become frustrated during a debate, it is always better to pull yourself away from it and focus on something else for a while. You can always go back later when there's not so much heat in the kitchen, and can approach others with a calm that furthers the chances of your proposal gaining acceptance rather than rejection. Also keep in mind that when editors disagree on a particular approach, or addition/removal of material, it is better to not bludgeon and simply call an RfC and let consensus decide. No editor can win 100% of the arguments, right or wrong - it's the nature of the beast - so I'm asking you to please not let yourself get so wrapped-up that it becomes irreversibly frustrating and causes you to say/do something you'll regret later. Ok? If you think the new article has merit, let me know and I'll help you find RS. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 12:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think "oversexualization of women in video games" is real. The whole notion is a product of the weird "secular Puritan" American culture that was once championed by so-called "sex-negative feminists" and fundamentalist Christians, but now has taken over the self-professed "progressive" mainstream that is doing absolutely crazy things like celebrating/promoting Islamic hijabs in the West. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 12:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Ironically, you have inadvertently reinforced the need for such an article by bringing forward a different POV. See if there are RS you can cite to avoid WP:OR and voila! - we have an insightful and necessary new article in the pedia. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 12:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A few more sources: Forbes, Affinity Magazine, Vice, and there are many more. ^{added 12:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)}

Yes, really, that's what I talk about - the supposedly-progressive hipster weirdos calling themselves "games journalists" with opinions more aligned with the Islamist norms than the Japanese culture they hate so much. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 12:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And they also hate the gamer culture, whcih is what GamerGate was really about (and not their lies in the literally thousands of completely false articles that Wikipedia's ridiculous article "Gamergate controversy" is based on and they actually often link to Wikipedia from their articles) - it was a fight-back response of long-bottled frustration from gamers against journalists sparked by how in a period of 48 hours about a dozen articles in different outlets declared the gamer culture to be over and finished (the "Gamers Are Dead") in a coordinated attack via a mailing list called GameJournoPros. So it's really a war between gamers and "games journalists" and their various allies and fellow travelers (other journalists, grievance-studies academia), who completely control the official narrative. It's a very long story very short. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 12:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that isn't such a good topic for you (or me). I’ve heard a little about gamergate and prefer to steer clear. How are things looking for potential GA/FA promotion on the Arthurian legend articles? Do you see any candidates? ^Atsme _Talk 📧 12:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to get the real story, I recommend https://www.amazon.com/Inside-Gamergate-Social-History-Revolt-ebook/dp/B074PC6318 (there's a free audiobook version too: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLfZhTJTjMVlKJcQkGRggMFbyKEMuENQQp). I'm not interested in doing GAs at all and I guess I'll just keep rewriting them without end in sight anyway, these subjects are just incredibly complicated and I'm still only slowly learning and keep correcting my own mistakes all the time. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 12:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But if you're personally interested, I think I did Merlin (poem) about right at least. I also moved parts of it to Robert de Boron and elsewhere to make it more concise. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. I'll take a look at it today. Thank you! ^Atsme _Talk 📧 17:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually intrigued by the idea of an Oversexualization of women in video games article. I'll definitely have to gather sources for that. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 09:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you place it in Category:Urban legends, along with the likes of Satanic ritual abuse‎ and other such moral panics. Category:Hoaxes in the United States and Category:Mass hysteria too. (talk) 09:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

I mean, it's not really any of that, it's just a difference opinion between these criticisms and your beliefs on the matter. I suggest you relax and stop creating a hysteria over these criticisms. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 10:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you give a title "Oversexualization of women in video games", instead if something like "Criticism of sexuality / sexual themes in video games", then yes, it will be "a hysteria" indeed, but not mine. Btw, there is already the article Video game controversies, largely about the hysteria related to the so-called "violent games" (no video game was ever violent, unlike many conventional sports), but there is a section "sexual themes" as well. (I also happened to write the article Controversies surrounding Mortal Kombat myself.) Oh, and there is Sex and nudity in video games too, as i just found out. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 10:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We're talking about the reaction, and the concept of 'oversexualization of women in video games' is a specific subject that gets a lot of press. We're just writing about what critics and authors have written about. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 11:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would suggest that you relax, again. There is nothing happening that requires the tension you're exhibiting. - Bryn (talk) (contributio