User talk:PRehse

This is PRehse's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|PRehse}} on your talk. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

till December 23, 2006 till March 20, 2007 till March 26, 2012 till end of 2013 till end of 2014 till end of 2015 till end of 2016 till end of 2017 till November 19, 2018

This page is getting a bit big. I suggest you ask this bot to do automatic archiving for you.

You saw that User:Mackenziequinn167/sandbox had been moved to Mackenziequinn167/sandbox and applied a speedy tag to User:Mackenziequinn167/sandbox. That was unnecessary. You could have moved it back yourself - reversal of a move is permitted providing there have been no edits to the redirect. Try it next time. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:39, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RHaworth Cheers.PRehse (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because nothing on the page is incorrect when it comes to sources. Another reason is that Florian Munteanu is a known public figure, and a page about him would compliment that.

According to his manager Eduard Irimia, Florian Munteanu will star in three other Hollywood films in 2019: source in Romanian.

His page was first deleted on 21 October 2018 it had no sources, which I understood. I improved the page with many additions. Some people had concerns about his boxing career. He is not a professional boxer. Munteanu said that he had 78 amateur boxing matches. Legendfootballers (talk) · 20:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have fixed both dead end and orphan issues on Angela King (peace activist) now. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings PRehse, I hope this message finds you well.

I am writing regarding a new article, the draft for which you have positively reviewed 3 days ago. The page name is Dimash Adilet I wanted to ask you, if you would be willing to review this page in your spare time, as I have just moved it into mainspace after some reviewing. I thought since you have already seen the draft, your opinion would be extremely valuable to me. I would welcome any thoughts you have on this.

I would like to create another article next month, but I only ever go on to a new article once I am sure the previous one is up to standards. If you give a positive opinion on this one, I can calmly leave it in the hands of the community, and go on to new pages. If you don't have time for this, however, by all means, do not feel pressured to review it.

Thank you very much in advance and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Keep this community great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatgoodperson (talk • contribs) 01:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Greetings! I have just checked the page I told you about, and noticed that you made a small correction in the "categories" section. Thank you for taking your time to have a look. Did you get a chance to review it? Would you have any suggestions before I move on to other content? Thank you in advance, cheers! Thatgoodperson (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you crossed out your delete vote. Being a tad presumptuous, I assume you're going to vote to keep it. Or are you? Papaursa (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Rush922(talk) 12:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
	Hi PRehse, Sending you a warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019 and may this new year bring you joy and laughter. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! CoolSkittle (talk) 13:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings PRehse! I have some concerns that you reviewed this page and let it live in mainspace. It is full of puffery and non-neutral and unreliable sources such as the subject's LinkedIn account and company website. I went ahead and moved it back to the sandbox (via my work account Elysia (Wiki Ed)) and left the editor some feedback. I know that reviewing new pages is a thankless task and I also know you do a lot of it, so I'm sure pages like this slip through the cracks from time to time. Enwebb (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Enwebb Just placed some initial tags I seldom review articles. Definitely not this one.PRehse (talk) 23:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Did you know that when you use the page curation toolbar to tag pages that it automatically marks the page as reviewed? Your log shows that you did review that page, but it seems that was not your intent. Enwebb (talk) 02:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello PRehse, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Meatsgains(talk) 01:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

You need to do a revision to the Sedbergh School page to discuss issues with abuse in the 60's from masters and students. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingsclear (talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote this from scratch, what's with this revert? Hekerui (talk) 15:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Directive 89/391/EEC#Attribution of Workplace Health and Safety Directive if you want to comment. Hekerui (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave a comment on the talk page addressing my argument. Hekerui (talk) 14:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to my comment at Talk:Workplace Health and Safety Directive. Hekerui (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hekerui Or you can move the page properly first (not copy paste) and then make the changes. What you should not do is create a topic on the same subject with just a title change like you did. It is disruptive and not helpful. Your title I think is marginally better than the original so I don't it is a problem but others may disagree.PRehse (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Someone re-changed the page of Ambrogio Spinola and re-putted a title of Marquis in the name of the article, which makes it unusually long :(

I think most sources refer to him simply as Ambrogio Spinola and the lead and infobox explains all his titles. So i don't understand why the ", 1st Marquis of the Balbasses" is being added in the name of the article. Also I don't know if the move has been done correctly.

Barjimoa (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hello dear, PRhse,

About the page Arasp Kazemian all notabilities are written in persian language and in perisan websites. What should we do to keep it on Wikipedia. He is very famous, please look at his personal website www.kazemian.net --Parsbyte (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
I notice you deleted the edit note I left here, without any explanation. It was there for a reason, but maybe I didn't explain it very well. I've re-written it; if you aren't happy about it, can you please say why? Regards, Swanny18 (talk) 01:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do you move a page when the designation page already exists? The name "Melanie G. Smith" is incorrect. Her name is "Melanie George Smith" according to the sources. BTW, instead of just reverting pages, you could have tried to help before (also when you reverted, you did not look at the changes between the pages and so you lost updated information). Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm obviously doing something wrong trying to publish this article about Ashi Tashi Dorji. Pls can you advise. Doctor 17 (talk) 11:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted to the last version by Charlie Awesome, removing text added by suspected sockpuppet account of banned user User:G.-M. Cupertino. Unfortunatly this has also removed some of your edits. Please do not remove red links and please do not add any more text to the article unless it is supported by inline citations (WP:PROVEIT). -- PBS (talk) 19:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful. List of Teen Wolf secondary characters was not the same as list of Teen Wolf minor characters and list of Teen Wolf characters was (and still is!) monstrous in size and desperately needed splitting. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I cant understand the issues you are talking about. Please help me understand which words are weasel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proma Mitra10 (talk • contribs) 09:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Morelos, Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amatlán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my article? He is a credible fighter and has over 3 fights in large organizations. You probably don’t much about MMA but PFL is the third biggsest MMA promotion in the United States. Please undelete it because I spent 3 hours making his page. Did you even read the article and check out record? I’m really not happy about what you did.. Castro13 (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

is there a exact reason you keep marking the page for speedy deletion ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aherron76 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

you reverted my edits on Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster) and Kaltenbach (White Elster). I know that for a proper attribution a move is preferred. However, I couldn't perform the move myself because the targets of the moves already existed. I've once asked an admistrator's help in a similar case, see here, but don't think the result was more clearly than my edit summary "content taken from Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster), see its history for attribution" at Kaltenbach (White Elster). (The admistrator did delete the redir, then moved the full article to the new title which was deleted before.)

Also, after I did the I did some more stuff after the copy paste of the article: I've exchanged the talk pages of these articles as well, modified the links pointing to these articles Kaltenbach (Weisse Elster) and modified the interlanguage links in Wikimedia. You did not revert this, so now the pages were in somewhat confusion. (E.g. a double redir at Kaltenbach (Weisse Elster).)

I therefore reverted your revert again. However, If you really think that my edit summary content taken from Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster), see its history for attribution is not enough for telling everyone the proper attritbution, please tell me (I put your talk page on my watch list). I can revert all my contributions, then ask an admistrator to delete the redir, and then perform the move again.

Regards --Cyfal (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyfal The easiest way is to request a speedy deletion (Db-G6) specific for a move (usually with Twinkle) and when granted just move the article. Complicated copy pastes are just not done. Please revert and I will help with the move requests.PRehse (talk) 16:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I reverted a part and will do the other things in the next days. --Cyfal (talk) 18:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be no getting rid of this article. Every time it's removed the author recreates it almost immediately. Papaursa (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Papaursa Not for lack of trying, time for a new AfD.PRehse (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Currently there is an article TAD Disability Services (which is for one state only), and a redirect to it from the national body TAD Australia. I proposed that the national body should have the article, expanded to cover other states as well. In the process, the direction of the redirect was to be reversed. Nobody objected to the proposal, so I did it. But you reverted my work on these articles with the comment "improper copy paste losses attribution - do correct move instead". I am unclear how to proceed. If I just move one of those articles over the top of the other, the history of the target page will be lost. What is the "correct move" procedure in this case where the target already exists? --Gronk Oz (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gronk Oz I see your point. Give me a momment to set it right.PRehse (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gronk Oz Ok please put all your changes into TAD Disability Services. A copy paste from the last version of TAD Australia before my redirect is fine. I would do it myself but then you would loose your attribution. Once done I will ask the TAD Australia to be deleted so TAD Disability Services can be moved in it's place.PRehse (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have updated TAD Disability Services to where it was. --Gronk Oz (talk) 08:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I see that the move is all done now - thank you for your help, and I apologize for causing the confusion.--Gronk Oz (talk) 06:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noticed yesterday that the wikipedia page dedicated to the film Dancin' Thru the Dark had been redirected to the Screen One page. On it, it is hard to find the film if you do not know it. As I think this film deserves its own page, I recreated it, in the same manner as the film 'A Question of Attribution that has a link to its own page from Screen One. This made me assume that the same could be done for Dancin' Thru The Dark. However, I notice that all my work has been reverted. Are you responsible for this and if yes, can you explain why this is done? I do hope the film can have a Wikipedia page.

kind regards, jotola

Jotola (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker): Jotola, if you check the history on Dancin' Thru The Dark, you will see that was reverted by Onel5969 with the following edit summary: "doesn't meet wp:nfilm". That refers to Wikipedia's guidelines for determining whether a film is "Notable" (in Wikipedia's special meaning of the term) enough to have its own article. You can read those detailed criteria at the following link: WP:NFILM.

The article as you wrote it had four references. Two of those just related to the Trivia section which should not be there at all. One was simply a link to a BBC One page that did not even mention this movie. That just leaves one, which was an interview with the writer, Willy Russell, about the movie. That one reference is a long way short of the standard of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

So to establish the movie's notability, I suggest starting by collecting your sources. Find all the books that have been written about the movie. Find the full-length reviews published by major critics. Find the in-depth articles written about it in major newspapers and magazines. Find where Sixty Minutes and other reliable journalistic shows have discussed it in detail. Find the major national and international awards it has won. And so on ... see the Notability criteria linked above for the sort of things that will support the case for keeping the article. Then write the article based on what those sources say, citing them as you go. I hope this helps - good luck! --Gronk Oz (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo Gronk Oz. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the criteria, work to be done then. Jotola (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jotola: I have just improved the redirect, but there is more detail in the deleted content than currently in Screen One#Dancin' Thru the Dark which I think shouldn’t be lost. I’m almost ambivalent about whether Dancin' Thru the Dark should be resuscitated as an article or the extra content should be added to the Screen One table, but on balance I prefer the former as it would overload the Screen One table disproportionately. Here are some references that might help justify Dancin' Thru the Dark being an article: Radio Times, Time Out, BFI, BBFC, Mike Ockrent obit, The Guardian, Colin Welland obit, The Guardian, Richard Broke obit, The Independent, Rotten Tomatoes

Jim Craigie (talk) 17:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farshid Asadian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farshid Asadian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 22:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Polyamorph. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, LIberty (sternwheeler), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Polyamorph (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not something I intended to do. Cheers, Polyamorph (talk) 09:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Air India 101 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Petebutt (talk) 09:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I meant to have the article located at Skarlet, since it directs to nowhere else. I tried to do a proper move from Skarlet (Mortal Kombat character), but it wouldn't let me, since the page already existed as a redirect. I think I need some help here. Kokoro20 (talk) 11:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kokoro20 Best way is to request a deletion for the purpose of a move and then when done move the page. I have stated the process for you.PRehse (talk) 12:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alight. Thank you. That should hopefully take care of things. Kokoro20 (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Something wrong with the reviewing tool. I just moved the page, it was in the Wikipedia: space, and didn't review it at all. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could help me. I submitted the photo yesterday, which I have permission to use. It got flagged as a potential copyright / licensing issue. It recommended that I contact the photographer who owns the image, and ask him to email Wikipedia and tell them he allows its use, which he did. I also have an invoice from the photographer that grants me a universal license to use the image on Wikipedia and elsewhere. My issue: it looks like the image is still flagged. What can I do to clear it with Wikipedia? Thank you. Brian Keiths (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me with my first Wikipedia contribution. Dlwsnz (talk) 02:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PRehse, Greetings. I had nominated 4 MMA fighter articles for AfD about 4-5 days ago, but they have yet to show up on "Alert section" of Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts. I have sought help - see here Delsort - AfD, and Bot operator has assisted on the matter; however, I still have yet to see the AfD articles listed on WikiProject MMA page.Just wonder, does the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts need to include "delsort" on the banner of the talk page? or certain tag is missing to cause the problem. Kindly advise and thank in advance. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, good day. I just want to inform you that I have sought help and the issue has been resolved, - see HERE as the bot was fixed and started to pick up delsort again. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey when you have time could you please review this article I made? Geovana Peres vs Lani Daniels II Thanks --Bennyaha (talk) 02:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter, I noticed you haven't been doing much WP editing lately. Just want to let you know that you and your contributions are missed. I'm hoping it's simply because you're taking a Wikibreak (I know how sometimes those are needed) and not because you're dealing with more unpleasant issues. Papaursa (talk) 00:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Papaursa Sick computer enforced a long overdue wikibreak. Was spending too much time so a reset was in order. All is well thanks for asking.PRehse (talk) 06:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, I have the same thought as Papaursa for not seeing you lately. Good to know all is well with you. See you when you return. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you please take a look at the draft Draft:Horiyasu that I created. It translated it from the Japanese Wikipedia but is was declined two times on English Wikipedia. I reworked it and submitted for the moderation again. While I did that there was a service message saying that Youtube links should be removed (which I did). Since you know Japan quite well and since you are a very experienced editor I would like to ask for your advice. Please tell what to do with these YouTube links and what else needs to be improved in this draft. Thank you!--Martenpharez (talk) 13:37, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please create new article about new grand martial arts competition.

1. 2016 : The 2016 Cheongju World Martial Arts Masterships, which is to begin on September 2, will be an Olympics for martial arts with 2073 ...........

1. 2017 World Youth martial Arts Masterships

1. Chungju World Martial Arts Masterships - 2019

Two for seniors and one for youth.

http://www.martialarts.or.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=history_eng

http://womau.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=e_b4x1&wr_id=119

http://womau.org/e_index_true.php?pageNum=1&subNum=1

http://www.chungju2019.com/home_eng/sub.php?menukey=130

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aikido terms and principles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 06:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that you've cut way back on your WP editing, but I do understand (as I've reduced mine). Still, I wanted to let you know you haven't been forgotten and wanted to wish you happy holidays and a happy and healthy 2020. Papaursa (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Papaursa A sick computer was the excuse to cut back on what had become serious mission creep. Might do more editing again but will see. Thanks for the note and best holiday wishes from my end.PRehse (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, PRehse! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Atlantic306 TT me 11:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, Bet you have a good well-deserved Wiki break. Happy New Year and good to see you are back. Best. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 19:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter, if you're interested, and feeling of stout constitution, there's a bunch of MMA proposals at WT:MMANOT. I would understand if you're not so inclined, but you're generally a voice of reason and that topic can always use all the reason it can get. Just coming off a 3 week break myself and I can see the allure of it. I came back and, fool that I am, waded into those discussions and a number of martial arts AfD ones as well. Papaursa (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:German eskrimadors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I'm hoping you can help. Last January 2019 I did an article on Ashi Tashi Dorji, which you kindly moved out of my sandbox. I'm not sure what I did wrong that it didn't appear, but too long ago to try to figure that out. My concern now is that I am still attached to the article through my sandbox talk page. I also would like to clear my sandbox, but not sure how. Hoping you can help! regards Doctor 17 (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

== Old Quarrels ==

Hello PRehse. This morning I edited a page on Francesco Sidoti and, exclusively by my own mistake I clicked on an old entry ["Pedro Scuro"] the subject of a bitter discussion with one or two of your colleagues, on account of the entry having "promotional content under criterion G11" (!?). That happened years ago and their allegations were so outlandish that I simply gave up publishing the text altogether. There was absolutely no "promotional content" whatsoever, as the subject of the entry is a highly regarded intellectual with important contributions to his fields of knowledge, and a member of prestigious international organizations. He was also my former mentor, so I would have never wanted to put him or his work in any embarrassing circumstance. Nevertheless, as I concede that one might always be in the wrong, it would be much more profitable if my fault-finders disclose exactly where exactly my text was "promotional". On the other hand, over and above all that unpleasant hugger-mugger, I'm now trying to publish a new entry, on Francesco Sidoti, so I'm awaiting your kind reply. Yours, Peiris Fox Peiris Fox (talk) 00:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC) 00:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Aikido for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at WT:MARTIAL § Karate Association of Darbhanga. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PRehse. If you've got a bit of spare time, I'm wondering if you could take a look at this. There's been quite a number of accounts showing up and being blocked for socks. They're all editing articles related to this association and one of its members. (See also User talk:Dane#Deprodding of Deepika Dhiman and User talk:Dane#Deprodding of Karate Association of Darbhanga). If the articles can be kept then fine, but that's not completely clear. Since you've got lots of experience working with these types of articles, you might be able to better assess them than I can. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lethweimaster. I am aware you are a member of many combat sports Wiki Projects and have edited many Lethwei related article. I am not aware if you usually involved in WikiProjects, but I just created the Wikipedia:WikiProject Lethwei and was wondering if you were interested in being part of the project? If you are interested in being part of the team, please go add your name on the wiki project page and let me know if you have any advices since you have more experience than me on Project pages! Let's grow the ecosystem of Lethwei together! Best regards, Lethweimaster (talk)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Why are her 2 living daughters omitted from mention? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C40:4300:40E:41EC:4844:3C87:D15F (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!
	Hello PRehse, Wishing you a joyous holiday season and a happy and peaceful New Year. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PRehese. Could you take a look at Maurice Novoa and assess it? Concerns about it being a possible autobio were raised on the creator's user talk page here and it would be nice if an uninvolved editor familiar with martial bios could take a look at it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you please have a look at this page and tell me what you think of its title being charged please. As this is a very bold edit, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oomoto Thankyou. Zongqi (talk) 08:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You have uploaded these 3 files and the text says "Picture of myself". That mean that you are probably not the photographer.

The copyright belongs to the photographer so I would like to ask if you can tell us who the photographer is and even better if the photographer can send us a permission. --MGA73 (talk) 15:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - I hope you are the right guy for this. Anyway, the Jieitaikakutojutsu page made me think, as Kenji Tomiki was one of the people who helped establish the Aikido techniques in JTKJ; would it be accurate to say this would count as Tomiki-ryu/Shodokan Aikido?

There's this one "IP-numbers-username" guy who thinks it's wrong, as JTKJ was established in 1959 (with development process beginning in 1955) and Tomiki-ryu/Shodokan was *sorta* founded in 1958 (as far as Tomiki starting to teach Aikido at Wasada University) and officially in 1967 (with establishment of the honbu dojo). Also Tomiki has been involved with Judo and experimenting with new stuff in Aikido since late 1940s. Basically, I'm asking "at what point does Tomiki's Aikido start to deviate from Aikikai/base Aikido enough to be indentified as Tomiki-ryu Aikido?"

I'd like your thoughts on the matter. Thanks! TrickShotFinn (talk) 15:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TrickShotFinn The introduction of Aikido techniques does not make something a derivative of Aikido. That's true with the Goshin kata of Judo as with the JTKG. The dogma at Shodokan Honbu is that it is the Aikido of Ueshiba that's taught and if anything it is a training method. Still, since in 1958 he was very much part of the Aikikai the 1967 date makes the most sense for a separation date. I hope that helps.PRehse (talk) 10:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thanks.TrickShotFinn (talk) 11:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts § The Sherdog requirement. Cassiopeia talk 01:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Hi PRehse, Have an enjoyable holiday season! Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Respected Sir

I am National level karate athlete from India and I am not professional on computers and Wikipedia’s so I not able to create any article/page of sports person.

So I hereby humbly requested you to please help me to fixed a problem Related to Mr. Aniket Gupta Karate player and other Articles.

Because he is India's one the senior most Player from Delhi delhi state (India), He is Working in Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance (Govt. of India) (sports Quota Job 2016) and He is 4 Time Commonwealth Karate Championships medalist, 4 Time South Asian Karate Championship Medalist and other international medalist and also he is the 14 Times Official National karate Championship medalist (National Federation - NF) since 2005 till date and 18 Times official Delhi State Karate Championship Champion since 2004 till date and I am one of the Biggest Fan of Karate and as well as Aniket Gupta Karate.

Link of Aniket Gupta: ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aniket_Gupta )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nH63zVPdcA

https://arunachalobserver.org/2020/01/11/indian-karatekas-curve-niche-global-events/

https://www.sportzbusiness.com/aniket-gupta-and-deepika-dhiman-selected-for-karate-league/

https://thedailyguardian.com/india-doesnt-have-a-sports-culture-aniket/

https://arunachaltimes.in/index.php/2021/03/11/gupta-and-dhiman-leave-for-turkey-to-participate-in-wkf-karate-1-premier-league/

https://olympics.com/en/news/world-karate-championships-2021-india-results

http://setopen.sportdata.org/wkfranking/ranking_main_competitor.php?ranking_country=IND&ranking_competitor=IND&ranking_competitor_name=GUPTA%20ANIKET

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr_QDbFREwE

https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/india-bag-rich-medal-haul-at-commonwealth-karate-championship-113101500498_1.html

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/more-sports/others/india-bag-rich-medal-haul-at-commonwealth-karate-championship/articleshow/24198108.cms

https://www.sportzbusiness.com/karate-national-champions-are-not-even-covered-by-media-aniket-gupta/

https://arunachalobserver.org/2020/01/11/indian-karatekas-curve-niche-global-events/

https://sportslightmedia.com/aniket-gupta-deepika-dhiman-to-represent-india-in-karate-1-premier-league/

https://www.sportzbusiness.com/aniket-gupta-and-deepika-dhiman-selected-for-karate-league/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/more-sports/others/india-bag-rich-medal-haul-at-commonwealth-karate-championship/articleshow/24198108.cms

https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/india-bags-4-medals-in-karate-with-ambedkar-as-coach/

https://newsstump.com/aniket-gupta-question-to-kai-work-culture/

https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-IRTB-17752

https://sportsauthorityofindia.nic.in/writereaddata/linkimages/2775656735.pdf

https://arunachaltimes.in/index.php/2021/03/11/gupta-and-dhiman-leave-for-turkey-to-participate-in-wkf-karate-1-premier-league/

https://www.wkf.net/imagenes/campeonatos/akf-seniorresultados-16th-akf-senior-championships-15-21-july-tashkent-uzbekistan-001.pdf

https://www.the-sports.org/aniket-gupta-karate-spf609167.html

Thank you so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.51.116.194 (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of Eat Bulaga! segments, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:List of Eat Bulaga! segments and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:List of Eat Bulaga! segments during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Urban Versis 32 (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may wish to add this to your user page: {{Wikipedia:New pages patrol/CoY userbox 2017}} Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award
		For over 1,000 article reviews during 2018. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PRehse,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

   Send