User talk:JuliusCaesar16

Hi JuliusCaesar16! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
81		Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus (talk)	Add sources
953		Battle of Actium (talk)	Add sources
23		Nikonion (talk)	Add sources
4,005		Mark Antony (talk)	Add sources
1,952		Pompey (talk)	Add sources
29		Sant Martí d'Empúries (talk)	Add sources
5		Evelyne Brancart (talk)	Cleanup
103		Athenian festivals (talk)	Cleanup
996		Caesar (title) (talk)	Cleanup
32		Caulonia (ancient city) (talk)	Expand
4		1318 in Ireland (talk)	Expand
37		Aljaraque (talk)	Expand
155		Gaius Octavian (Rome character) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
105		Giresun (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
40		David Kaplan (philosopher) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4		National Engineering School of Carthage (talk)	Merge
3		Marina Goliadkina (talk)	Merge
13		Robyn's Best (talk)	Merge
21		50s BC (talk)	Wikify
778		Sacred Band of Thebes (talk)	Wikify
665		Vitruvius (talk)	Wikify
9		Donka Angatscheva (talk)	Orphan
11		Noa Wildschut (talk)	Orphan
2		Daniel Babut (talk)	Orphan
27		Kepoi (talk)	Stub
11		Thomas Butler, Viscount Thurles (talk)	Stub
28		Basiluzzo (talk)	Stub
9		Loughmoe Castle (talk)	Stub
45		Phasis (town) (talk)	Stub
48		Terme (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary.
• "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
• Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
• Wikipedia does not tolerate copyright violations or plagiarism. Paraphrase sources, do not steal text from them.
• We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
• Primary sources are usually avoided to prevent original research. Secondary or tertiary sources are preferred for this reason as well.
• Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
• Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
• Assume as best as you can that other editors are here to help.

Ian.thomson (talk) 00:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]