User talk:Quisqualis

Thank you for looking at those articles. Re: Leszek Podhorodecki - "ok." in Polish means "c." (circa). refers to pl:Ilińce and more relevant, en Illintsi. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Quisqualis, I see you removed George Dimitropolos (pulo) a second time from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Crest_Sanitarium_(New_York). Dimitropolos was director of landmark building in Romania called Palatul_Bragadiru and he owned a hotel called Hotel Olympia in NYC (200 East 42nd Street) around 1914 (research in process) and then ended up in River Crest. He is not your average individual. Can you tell me your reasons for having removed him from River Crest? He is listed on this wikipedia here https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatul_Bragadiru. Sources include death certificate and Play Bill from the Romanian Theatre. Please advise.

Your reasons for removal are below: 1. We do not use Wikipedia as a source for Wikipedia. 2. not a notable individual 3. lack of citations of reliable sources so that others may access the same information independently My responses: Wikipedia is not the only source presented, there is hard documentary evidence, death certificate and playbill. The role of director and owner of a NYC hotel is notable. If we only relied on obtaining information which others may access independently then why do we have special institutions called Libraries or Wikipedia. I feel Libraries provide a valuable service and help obtain information that other people CANNOT source independently. Sorry but I am not following your reasoning. 23:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

Wikipedia's standards of notability require coverage of a subject in WP:Reliable sources. Also, notability in Romania does not confer notability in the English-speaking world. Was Dimitropulo a national hero of Romania? Did he have an obituary in the New York Times? What books were written about him? Owning a hotel in New York City is something which many people have done. Some of the owners of multiple NYC hotels or national hotel chains have WP articles written about them, but maybe not Dimitropulo. Small fish, big pond. Do you see my point? It's the viewpoint of Wikipedia itself. Also note that we NEVER use WP as a source for WP, and that a theatre playbill is not a reliable secondary source, but a primary source, mainly for cast and crew information. A death certificate is a valid source on Wikipedia for verifying death, its time and its place. For en:Wikikpedia to consider Dimitropulo notable may take a lot of WP:Original research on your part. Unfortunately, OR is forbidden in WP articles.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:06, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Quisqualis

I am sure you are quite busy but I wanted to point out that I fixed the photos on River Crest, (no water mark, they were provided by Greater Astoria Historical Society) did you notice, any comments? 01:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

The results look good. You may want to note that Wikipedia has an WP: Image lab which can remove the ink stamp from the sky area of the colored postcard brochure. They do a very good job there. Apparently, the wrong face of the postcard was inked in the stamp-cancellation process back in 1920--Quisqualis (talk) 05:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you. I've submitted to the lab. 09:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

Hello Quisqualis

I noticed you removed Kelly (Mohre) Hyman stating she is not notable on this wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doin%27_Time_on_Planet_Earth Recently I found this PDF, hoping it will give some more credibility to the actress. Do you think so?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DOIN_TIME_ON_PLANET_EARTH.pdf 

Josephintechnicolor (talk) 06:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis! You created a thread called Trying to add a ref to an image caption at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis! You created a thread called Welcome letter with many links at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Will you be updating the sly syndrome article page to include the additional information posted on the talk page from Gary?

Thanks,

165.166.88.194 (talk) 20:57, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IP editor. The material presented in Gary at Ultragenyx's post regarding Mepsevii contains a disclaimer,

"The effect of this drug on the central nervous system manifestations of MPS VII has not been determined."  

which negates its inclusion in the article until further studies suggest otherwise.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• "Do not link to any commercial booksellers, such as Amazon.com"
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_news
• Simple notion: amazon is first and foremost a sales site
• There are plenty of new stories that say “published today” to document the date of publication
• Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 11:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jacques Derrida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Animal cracker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you be a fresh pair of eyes for Murder of Rachael Runyan ? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 19:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It was a pretty well-done article to begin with. Hope this helps.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits. However, in the "Early life" section, you put three ^{[citation needed]} tags, when all that information was available in http://www.newsweek.com/2015/02/27/one-activists-search-cure-his-autism-drawing-violent-backlash-306998.html. Ylevental (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ylevental. I have a good excuse: I edited that article over a 24-hour period (with sleep), and had so exhausted my brain by reading that article about 25 times in its entirety in a most granular manner, and most of the references as well. I left those tags to remind myself, or another reader (whose initials might be YL) to put in the cite. Would you please do it for me? I need to recharge my batteries with a morning of the Daily Mail now!--Quisqualis (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. Your hard work is definitely appreciated. Ylevental (talk) 17:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your comment on my talk page :) Mathew hk (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:36, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quisqualis: For my edit of Changing Incorrect Information on December 20,1972, I do not understand your comments or your references. Here are your comments: Hi, THO2! please tell us what error you are seeing. Thanks--Quisqualis (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC) THO2, I checked what you're trying to do. The link you have goes straight to: ForbiddenYou don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/view_details.cgi on this server. Apache Server at www.airdisaster.com Port 80

Ten may be the correct number, but, with an invalid source citation and no idea how to cite sources (see your Talk page), you cannot make that edit. It will be reverted. Get a better source citation.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Look at my edit and read Wikipedia:Inline citation.It's quite simple, but you need to learn it.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC).

1st, I was on the plane that crashed. I have just finished writing a book about the crash and the numbers of 10 dead out of 45 on board the North Central plane are correct. There is no better source than the NSTB - AA-73-15 which is the investigative report on the accident by the National Safety Transportation Board. The link takes you to that report, but you then have to click on it. Trying to copy the link of the report itself did not work. So, I need more insight into your comments and exactly what you did. Thank you, Todd (THO2@comcast.net). — Preceding unsigned comment added by THO2 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tho2. I was correcting an edit from 2010, when you were an IP editor. Sorry about the confusion!--Quisqualis (talk) 23:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis! You created a thread called Newbie pest-on-the-loose at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
334		Marriage in Hinduism (talk)	Add sources
220		Chitpavan (talk)	Add sources
1,535		Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (talk)	Add sources
65		Origin of Latter Day Saint polygamy (talk)	Add sources
32		Richard B. Ogilvie (talk)	Add sources
2,347		The Gambia (talk)	Add sources
43		Maratha Kranti Morcha (talk)	Cleanup
1,289		Endocannabinoid system (talk)	Cleanup
20		Limonov (novel) (talk)	Cleanup
92		Neuroimmune system (talk)	Expand
5		Princess Christa of Thurn and Taxis (talk)	Expand
11		Fritz Wolffheim (talk)	Expand
2,182		Inflammation (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
32		Zakhar Prilepin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
294		2004 Democratic Party presidential primaries (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
154		Leptomeningeal cancer (talk)	Merge
13		OpinionJournal.com (talk)	Merge
26		Neoplastic meningitis (talk)	Merge
24		Camargo Guarnieri (talk)	Wikify
1,124		Perfume (talk)	Wikify
4		Christopher Payne (photographer) (talk)	Wikify
3		Siddhewadi (talk)	Orphan
5		N-acylethanolamine acid amide hydrolase (talk)	Orphan
10		How Life Imitates Chess (talk)	Orphan
134		Kaffeklubben Island (talk)	Stub
31		Cape Morris Jesup (talk)	Stub
2		Jacob Nellis Farmhouse (talk)	Stub
6		Aleksandr Averin (publicist) (talk)	Stub
164		SNAC (talk)	Stub
31		Cape Columbia (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duke Cunningham is a decorated veteran to say the least. To not write about his military history because he is mostly notable for his political and criminal background is quite injudicious. So I believe there can be a healthy debate about including his military career in the introductory paragraph.

But to undo a edit and deliberately accuse someone of violating WP:COI is highly disrespectful, more so when the language used is in line to policies of WP:NPV. I would request you to refrain from these inflammatory remarks. SoloKnowHow83 (talk) 17:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis! You created a thread called Regarding blocked users at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are Welcome sir.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to you at the help desk in a manner that was intended to be even-handed, because the help desk is not for discussing articles and because that was the same advice I had given the otehr party. However, I absolutely agree with you, so here, after taking my "help desk responder" hat off, I can say that I hope you will take the time to clean that mess up. If your source are good and the scammers' sources are not, you should be able to defend your edits if try to revert and we get into arbitration or something. Hit me on my talk page if needed.-Arch dude (talk) 03:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, you are at times too acerbic in comments at Teahouse. Often, the questions are posed by new editors, and they should not be hit with a stick, regardless of how righteous they come across. David notMD (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are getting too acerbic with all of your comments. You told an experienced editor that "Wikipedia isn't about the truth. It's about what is stated in reliable sources. Please cite one." Yet, my edit summary explained that you cannot cite things that are no longer there. Not to mention that items in the infobox do not need to be cited when the material in the text of the article is already cited. In this particular edit, the body of the article lists five roller coasters at Mt. Olympus Water & Theme Park. When I changed the infobox to agree with the text in the article you insisted there be a citation. Sorry, but your opinion is incorrect. The information is already within the body of the article. There are hundreds of infoboxes without citations for each entry.—JlACEer (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are unfamiliar:

From Help:Infobox

What should an infobox contain?

In general, data in infobox templates should be:

Already cited elsewhere in the article. Infoboxes, like the introduction to the article, should primarily contain material that is expanded on and supported by citations to reliable sources elsewhere in the article. However, if necessary (e.g., because the article is currently incomplete), it is possible to include footnotes in infoboxes.

—JlACEer (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited May 19th Communist Organization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francis McNamara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hydrangea hirta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leaching (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir, I have a request. Here it goes, on Shamsheer Vayalil wikipedia there is an infobox in which there is a column named alma mater. In that column name of two medical colleges are given: 1:) Kasturba Medical College, Manipal. 2:) Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai. When I clicked on the link of second college I found that the college is not actually located in Chennai. It is located in "Porur" a city in "Chennai".But in early life paragraph " Porur" is indicated. So I request you to add "Porur" in the format I am showing you below. "Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, ChennaiChennai(in alma mater column). Thanks. (left by IP editor 223.230.167.170 on 15 June 2019)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Konstantin

Please forgive me if it wasn't you that added the Citation Needed markers.

After I noticed this, I looked around and found quite a few things which were once on the internet in newspapers, stories, books and websites. Some of them have been deleted as time goes by, because most publications don't keep large backups, or old articles very long. TV stations in San Diego had a lot of this information on their Reporter Profile pages. Since I have retired, those pages were deleted. Some of this information was also posted on my personal website. It may have been deleted during my change in web hosts and site reorganizations. In any case, I found verifications for quite a few things. I posted several in February 2019 in the Talk section of the page. I posted more recently. So far, no one seems to have done anything about adding the citations. Since the page is about me, I cannot do it.

With a few very minor exceptions (which I noted on the Talk page), the profile/article/page/whatever you want to call it is accurate.

Any suggestions?

Phil Konstantin Phil Konstantin (talk) 21:43, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Therein lies the problem. A "page about you" isn't an encyclopedia article. If you wish for citations to be added to it, feel free to suggest the additions on the Talk page of your "whatever".--Quisqualis (talk) 23:38, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have checked out the page. Who wouldn't check out an article about themselves. The page is not an autobiography. That is against Wikipedia rules. I have readers or viewers in many different places. For example New York Newsday once wrote a review about one of my websites many years ago. I had never seen that publication before. I found out about it while doing an unrelated web search. Some people have contributed to discussions on the Talk Page, whom I do not know personally. I don't know who created it originally. Since the 'encyclopedia article' is about me, I don't know what else to call it. A few years ago, I did correct one error in the article. Another editor informed me that was inappropriate, since you are not supposed to change things about matters you are part of. I removed the change. Someone else then reapplied the change a few days later. I did suggest the additions for some of the Citation Needed matters on the Talk Page after someone (it appears it was you) added 'Citation Needed' to many parts of the article. Since then, nobody has applied those suggestions. Perhaps you are not the person who added the Citation Needed markers to the article. I do know that if I had added Citation Needed to an article, I would check back later to see if any information had been provided to clarify or support something.

I mainly use Wikipedia as a source of information. Occasionally, I try to improve it. With due respect, I doubt any additions to your profile actually improve the encyclopedia.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. But, why add Citation Needed if it won't make any difference?

Phil Konstantin (talk) 05:35, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nazca Lines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis,

I see that you blanked Pittosporum pentandrum, because species pages shouldn't point to genus pages. I've undone the change, because it's better to have a bad redirect than a blank page. You can now propose the page for deletion through some suitable process, either RfD or PROD, I guess.

PS: I see another user has tried to use your user page as a talk page :-D --Slashme (talk) 07:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! If someone didn't sign their posts, it is best to use {{subst:Unsigned|subst}} for registered users and {{subst:UnsignedIP|subst}} for IPs. YOu can use them as follow: {{subst:unsigned/unsignedIP|<username/IP>|<date and time - xx:xx, day month year + "(UTC)" at the end>}}. Thanks, MrClog (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Quisqualis

Thank you for the contribution you make on page Renewable energy in Vietnam. I'm really appreciated. I have a few questions I would like to ask for better understanding your contribution:

In Hydropower section, you said that "not all readers of this article live in Vietnam"; in Solar energy section you wrote "article is for a worldwide audience, not only your boss" and "Wikipedia articles are aimed at a worldwide audience, not one country". I edit this article with the purpose of bringing new information about types of renewable energy in Vietnam to everyone so all sections like Solar energy, Hydropower,... are written for the public. The page speaks itself: update situation in Vietnam for everyone may or may not live in Vietnam can read.

I don't understand much about your comment. Could you explain to me?

Thank you in advance, --Tống Minh Quân (talk) 02:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I left those edit summaries because you recently reverted an edit re "our country" and I was compelled to redo that edit.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:52, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. Unfortunately I am unable to reply with comment under your response and am attempting to reach out to you one more time. Would you possible be able to reach out to me over the phone? CCIBBInventor (talk) 18:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid that Wikipedia never functions that way. My communication to you was intended to be one-way only. --Quisqualis (talk) 18:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Vailulu'u#Okina. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you reverted my edit on Selangor Sultanate page, citing the reason it was unsource. I changed the year of reign thing because it doesn't line up with the history part of the page, which was cited. It doesn't make sense that the years are different. Froswo (talk) 07:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't mean to undo my copyedit on the vandalism on Mount Mazama again. Maccore Henni _{Mii! Pictochat Mii!} 15:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony Rackauckas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that this is a real category, so perhaps you'll find something else unencyclopedic. Category:Weird fiction writers Pelirojopajaro (talk) 06:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, I did that as soon as I realized what they had done. Having my own sandbox submitted by someone I don't even know and without my consent was a first for me... Victão Lopes ^Fala! 23:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you had removed some of the names from the Afridis article from the notable figures section stating that they are non-notable . Can I know your reason why they are not notable enough ? they are very highly regarded people in the Afridi tribes . I also cited a reference to the book written by Major Warburton giving extra information on the subject. Thank You Zaros Holstein (talk)Zaros Holstein —Preceding undated comment added 10:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Zaros Holstein, I did so on the basis of their not having articles written about them on Wikipedia, but soon afterwards I read that red-linked people are permissible on lists if the addition is sourced. Apologies for removing the two names, and I hope you or another editor will be able to write the articles about them which Wikipedia lacks.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for clarifying your actions , no problem . I will write then back. Zaros Holstein (talk)Zaros Holstein —Preceding undated comment added 12:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had given the source and url to the wiki article of the book eighteen years in the Khyber , but it seems like someone may have deleted that page for some reason , Now the only link available is the review for the book and where to read it , including on the article of it's Author Robert Warburton in the family section. And since it's a very old book I can't find the publishing house/publisher and the orignal writing date or the book. ~~Zaros Holstein Zaros Holstein (talk) 18:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis! You created a thread called Infobox spacing edits at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis, If it is ok to ask: Why do you not have an User page (anymore)? If I see a contributor with a "red name" I (wrongly) assume it's a newbie...

Thank you and have a good weekend --F.Blaubiget (talk) 06:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long story. Initially, I made an edit of one space character in order to turn my name blue. I recently realized that other editors might waste their time visiting a blank user page, and changed it back to red. I dislike summing myself up, and have minimal social media presence. An additional benefit of having a red name is that I can find my posts on discussion pages a little more easily.--Quisqualis (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and interesting to read. I never thought about that (avoiding that others visit a blank page; finding yourself more easily). Made me think... All the best and stay in touch. --F.Blaubiget (talk) 11:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You closed it with <s/> when it needed to be </s>. Schazjmd (talk) 23:43, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dearest Quisqualis,

You've responded to several things I have posted on the Wikipedia Teahouse. I don't always find your thoughts or suggestions useful or helpful, but, your input does not go unnoticed, and there is some insight, often mirroring subsequent comments.

That said, you don't have a user page. When I see your comments, your name is in red. Is there a reason you have not created a user page?

At the time I'm writing this, I'm new, but I took the time to at least create a minimal user page. On the other hand, you have many sections on your talk page, and it seems you've been around for a while.

Just a thought.

Regards,

PhanChavez (talk) 06:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quisqualis once had a user page, but chose to have it deleted. I've no idea why. Maproom (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As in Theodore Geisel's Sneeches, I wanted to be blue like everybody else. Then I thought about it, and got rid of my nearly-nonexistent User page.--Quisqualis (talk) 14:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Le Pouce (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, i found proper sources and they are removed, why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IntercontinentalEmpire (talk • contribs) 22:07, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

moved from user page --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me for addressing you in English. Did you read the 3 edit summaries? Two said "unsourced" the third one (reverting your first edit) said you removed an archived URL for no good reason.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:55, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't change categories. I add one. It wasn't for political purposes. It was for factual information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ovalsign19 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just cite a Reliable source and it will all be good.--Quisqualis (talk) 04:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you send me this message? My modification was correct, I always use the preview button. --d-n-f (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was an error. Look at the final edit once more, closely. And thank you for using the preview button.--Quisqualis (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for assisting me into becoming a sufficiently better encyclopedic editor. Not sure how to send a star or smiley emoji to you on Wiki, but if I did, both would be gifted to you straight away! EMETIB MAILLIW (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis! You created a thread called POV editing on Russia; noticed it takes forever to load and reload at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - following your kind welcoming message ([1]) I decided to register. However, I have been horrified with messages I have received within hours of registering, (see [2]) As you appear to be experienced here could you explain is this is normal ? Certainly, I have no interest in being involved if such aggression and toxicity is either accepted or commonplace.--SnowyMalone (talk) 19:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was posting on this talk page, SnowyMalone, and I get the impression from the Help Desk and the Teahouse that some people do have this experience. It's not what we want. We want Wikipedia to be welcoming to newcomers.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vchimpanzee - thank you. Following your message, I found The Teahouse and posted about the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnowyMalone (talk • contribs) 19:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a page over here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:4th_%26_Reckless which is for the company. But it is not getting accepted. Please tell me how can I make this an article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.251.171.23 (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at your draft, and now I will take some time to read your sources and do a bit of Googling to see what kind of WP:notability 4th & Reckless have achieved. Will get back to you. I like the company name very much.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edits on Adirampattinam stating "If there is sourced data regarding normal temps, don't replace it with record highs! Even if you like the source, that's inappropriate. Your interest in record highs is your personal thing, not Wikipedia's". I believe that the revert was unnecessary for a couple of reasons.

• Even if you like the source, that's inappropriate. First of all, the source I added is from the India Meteorological Department, which is an official source. Climatedata.org, according to their website uses modelled data and states "All of our climate data comes from a climate model. The model has more than 220 million data points and a resolution of 30 arc seconds. The model uses weather data from thousands of weather stations from all over the world. This weather data was collected between 1982 and 2012." Observed data is more reliable, especially if it is coming from an official source. This has been the norm in other climate tables in other countries where official sources are preferred if data is available. Secondly, you are just using a straw man argument where I use the source just because I like it, claiming that I don't like it. This has nothing to do with emotion, I am simply trying to improve climate data in Indian Cities that have long being plagued with vandalism and lack of good data compared to other cities. I can argue that you are just exhibiting the I don't like it mentality because you cannot justify why the previous version is better other than stirring up emotional responses.

• If there is sourced data regarding normal temps, don't replace it with record highs! Are you yelling at me. Clearly, that's not how you approach users who are acting in good faith trying to improve articles. In many cities around the world such as New York City, Paris, Moscow, Hong Kong, Cape Town, Mexico City, Sydney and etc, many climate tables have record highs and lows. It is standard to include this given that record temperatures are frequently discussed on the media. Should we start deleting record temperatures then because you don't like it? That would bring a lot of opposition from users. The India Meteorological Department source unfortunately does not have mean temperatures and because the temperatures differ from the climatedata.org source, we cannot use the mean temperatures from 2 different sources neither can one assume that mean temperatures is (max+min)/2 (some countries define mean temperatures differently or calculate it as a 24 hour average)

• Your interest in record highs is your personal thing, not Wikipedia's". Pointless personal attack. Since when it is Wikipedia's policy that we ought to delete record highs and lows. You are just using the Argumentum ad populum fallacy to weaken my position when the opposite holds true where most users do want to have record highs and lows (lack of deletion). Ssbbplayer (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, Ssbbplayer! Unfortunately, I made my edit while I was falling asleep and also in a hurry. I misconstrued your edit and did not look at the way it displayed in the article itself. There is nothing wrong with putting in record highs, if they appear where they are useful, which yours did. I see some strange edits on Wikipedia, sometimes to climate data, and acted in haste. Please accept my apologies.--Quisqualis (talk) 14:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quisqualis: No worries. Apologies for my statements as well. I am glad I was able to clarify my edits and resolve this issue. Thanks. Ssbbplayer (talk) 14:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article which i mention for suresh sharma has a significant mention about his efforts of protecting kadam tree.Also wiki general notability guidelines states clearly that wiki needs significant coverage but does not need to be the main topic of source material . Alekh99 (talk) 17:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are giving edit warring .please explain Alekh99 (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please check general notability guidelines Alekh99 (talk) 17:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the photograph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alekh99 (talk • contribs) 07:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the editing :)

Princesse Marissa (talk) 06:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you answer my question here? Thanks, Rodrigo Valequez^(🗣) 18:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you reverted a section on the T2 mycotoxin page related to chemical synthesis, and I am hoping you can explain why. This page was edited by one of my students, as part of the final project in a chemistry class, and I don't see a problem with the reverted paragraph and accompanying citation, but I may be missing something. thanks for reading! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajfrontier (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In my view, that paragraph was both undue emphasis on one paper as well as promotional namedropping. Science and medicine articles in Wikipedia are a breeding ground for such additions, which don't improve the articles they are added to. See: WP:SPAM.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:38, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Education assignment template?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you recently reverted one of my edits in Computer science, where the content was actually moved to another article. The revert wasn't necessary if you looked at the talk page, consensus had already been reached, so I'm scratching my head on this one. Anyway, I'm going to do re-revert, but wanted to post on your talk page to not start an edit war just so you know what's going on. Thanks! BthompsonHV 04:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Cheers. BthompsonHV 04:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Maybe you could help me think this out, since I wrote the "progenitor" part. What I was trying to say is that all the later devices are descendants of Plastibell. I mentioned Plastibell since few people have heard of Ross. Also, you refer to "devices" when referring to Ross. It should be "device," singular. Can you help me think this through? Thanks. 71.173.77.143 (talk) 10:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Descendant of the steel rings. Progenitor of the similar more modern devices. --Quisqualis (talk) 22:21, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis,

I don't understand why you reverted my contribution. If you click on the link, I can't find "Plantzafrica-SANBI(new)" but on the top of the page SANBI and a colourful logo PlantZAfrica.com where the "Z" is spelled as uppercase letter. "Plantzafrica-SANBI(new)" is also not the URL they use but "http://pza.sanbi.org/pleiospilos-nelii". Can you explain? --Cyfal (talk) 17:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It appeared to be an attempt at gratuitous humor, given the edit summary.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was the other way round - I was suprised by the wrongly spelled word plants and then looked curiously at the link where I found the uppercase Z and A as an explanation. I will then enter my version again in Pleiospilos nelii so that other readers will not any longer be surprised. --Cyfal (talk) 11:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I edited episode count of an Indian tv show by depending on information of another Wikipedia page. Here is the link to my edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/962300439 I have provided the link to my edit summery. I think Wikipedia only need reliable information but doesn't need visible reference to every information it shows. So I added the source link to my edit summary and I think it's enough. Please check it and edit that episode count or tell me I'll edit it again. Thank you . Md Maruf Parvez (talk) 23:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Md Maruf Parvez. You "edited episode count of an Indian tv show by depending on information of another Wikipedia page", which is something we never do in Wikipedia. This is because Wikipedia is not considered to be a reliable source, given that it is open-sourced and is known to contain many errors. Please read the page called WP:CIRCULAR, which explains why we never cite Wikipedia to support facts in Wikipedia. When changing facts in articles, always be sure to cite supporting sources in a way that is helpful to readers of the article, that is, by using in-line citations, and you will be "good to go". If you get your facts from a Wikipedia article, be sure to cite the same source the article gives as the reference.--Quisqualis (talk) 00:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the reason why I have trusted the source Wikipedia page: That Indian tv serial have been aired since a very long period and have been telecasted several times of a week. So the episode count can't be so low. The episode count, I think, is higher than as mentioned in the source Wikipedia page. You can search for it. As I found higher episode count on another willing page I edited the episode count based on that information and information of other web search results. Md Maruf Parvez (talk) 00:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Md Maruf Parvez my point is that it is never acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source for a Wikipedia article, ever. We editors must all find a reliable source for our changes to an article's facts, and cite it properly. Otherwise, our edits will be reverted.--Quisqualis (talk) 00:17, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I edited episode count of an Indian tv show by depending on information of another Wikipedia page. Here is the link to my edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/962311104 I have provided the link to my edit summery. I think Wikipedia only need reliable information but doesn't need visible reference to every information it shows. So I added the source link to my edit summary and I think it's enough. Please check it and edit that episode count or tell me I'll edit it again. Thank you . Md Maruf Parvez (talk) 23:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See identical post above.--Quisqualis (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I edited episode count of an Indian tv show by depending on information of another Wikipedia page. Here is the link to my edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/962294478 I have provided the link to my edit summery. I think Wikipedia only need reliable information but doesn't need visible reference to every information it shows. So I added the source link to my edit summary and I think it's enough. Please check it and edit that episode count or tell me I'll edit it again. Thank you . Md Maruf Parvez (talk) 23:46, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See identical post above.--Quisqualis (talk) 00:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Hamuyi it has been clear to me from day one also, that they are just trolling, other users seem to have an absolutely remarkable amount of "assume good faith" they are probably a sock of User:Shadowblade08 or User:Firestar9990 or at least from the same school. Theroadislong (talk) 18:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they all appear to have hatched from the same clutch of eggs this spring. There are a few more, including user:DaniHart08, who I knew right away was an adult male, and they all converse on-wiki. Initially, I thought it a miracle that Hamuyi and Shadowblade08.2 had found one another, and I hoped they would "get a room", but that was not to be. I've seen this trolling pattern a lot on the TH, perhaps with a different master; it seems to be be a compelling form of entertainment.--Quisqualis (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and the more that admins assume good faith ad infinitum, the more fun it is for the trolls. Theroadislong (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At times, editors find themselves competing to be helpful in these ridiculous situations.
Yet another, and, I believe, entirely original troll is Visionhelp. Initially, I thought this was a tragic case of schizophrenia or dementia. I later realized that they were a master of pompous, irritated pseudo-German gibberish. I think the sheer persistence of these trolls reveals their intent, as with a recently blocked user I seem to remember as "Ram Nareshji". AGF needs to be backed up by WP:CHECKUSER, given that WP is blocking around 1,000 users per day.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree regarding Hamuyi, and suspect ShadowBlade08 is a troll as well as DaniHart08. The question is, SPI or ANI? Nobody wants to chase these accounts down because they are believed to be kids. I don't think they are kids, but rather sophisticated trolls. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, mimicking childish linguistic patterns is part of the game, as young users are sacrosanct (probably for good reason). Either intentionally or otherwise, however, these trolls manage to insert "grown up" expressions into their posts at odd times, raising a red flag. Teahouse, beware.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Hamuyi has been indeffed for being WP:nothere.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not try to "troll". I will be making my edits more carful and stop focusing on my talk page so much. Firestar9990 (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you help me. I see you want to delete the article related to Galdino because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces. I did this accidentally and could use your help to fix this issue without deleting the article. I would appreciate itDanceEnthusiast (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was unaware of the speedy deletion. As I am not well versed in the redirect mechanisms, I am not a good choice to help you with this. You should contact the editors who are involved in this process. If you need to undo your edit, you can look up the edit on Special:Contributions/DanceEnthusiast and click the undo link for that edit.--Quisqualis (talk) 18:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not engage in tests on the article mainspace. Leave that for your sandbox, please. El_C 20:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for undoing your edit, El_C. I was aiming to undo the 3 preceding edits, made by what I perceive to be a troll masquerading as an Asian user with poor English skills. That particular brand of troll is somewhat insidious.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:31, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Thanks for following up. Regards, El_C 20:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
You are receiving this message because you are invited to take part at Wikipedia:Advice for newcomers where you can provide advice that will help our newcomers in the future. It is not a discussion forum, just a place where you say what advice would be helpful to our future editors. I would like to get at least 100 editors to take part in this so please feel free to spread the word to other editors as well. I look forward to seeing what you say to newcomers. Interstellarity (talk) 13:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis, I notice you are editing the Berrell Jensen page. I hope this is the place to query those edits, I'm new to this. There has been question as to whether Jensen is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. However, you have made cuts to the text removing the following

She exhibited at Drian Galleries amongst others. 

Drian Galleries are famous in history of art galleries for a number of reasons. Please Google Drian Gallery, Drian Galleries and Halima Nalecz. That Berrell Jensen exhibited there creates a context for the notability of her work. You have also removed:

In 1965 her work was included in a group show in Hester Rupert Art Museum, Graaff-Reinet, 

Again, this is pertinent to the question of notability as a user, I forget who, suggested that this particular exhibition was 'notable' because it occurred in a museum.

I understand citations are needed and User:Cullen328 has offered to help with this, it will take time.

Also you have edited the text so it now reads:

In 1977, Jensen moved to the United Kingdom, where she then started a craft centre in County Donegal, Ireland. 

You are the second editor to assume Ireland is in the United Kingdom. This is a serious error, given the history of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Thanks! --SandAJ (talk) 21:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis, I see you removed my 3D model of shock absorber which was added in Shock absorber article. Considering it is related to the subject and from engineering/mechanic area and people from that field are also interested to see an actual 3D model, may I ask why it was removed and what I did wrong? I also see you removed several of my 3D models added to specific subjects. I really do not see a reason for doing that: I followed all rules by Wikipedia, all those 3D models are mine, my copyrights, giving it for free for educational purposes and all of them are related to the subject of the article. I am just trying to improve things here, especially from engineering area, considering all of us use 3D models in 2020. Isn't that a step forward for Wikipedia, new improvement, especially when knowing that students use Wikipedia as a source of information? Some articles computer animations and video clips (and that is great!), so why 3D models cannot be added, too? Thank you in advance! Dape13 (talk) 06:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I must assume that you spotted my quaintly-worded plea at the Teahouse, and have "replied" by taking action. Thank you, this Wisbech situation is over my head, etc. I am planning to review your edits, so that I may learn. I pressed the thanks button on a couple of edits, but didn't wish to ring the bell too often! Sincere best wishes, Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 01:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have begun trimming the article, I think I may attempt to assemble some sections, Sports, for example, into a narrative structure. Comments are welcome, etc. Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 01:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, narrative structure would be beneficial. I had to take action when I saw 16th-century subsistence fishing referred to as "sport". I do hope the article's content is hosted elsewhere than Wikipedia, as we're not a webhost.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I realized that I lacked basic knowlege in in many areas, such as the one you have mentioned. I think some of the info was sourced, so it is not "forever lost". But plugging in one sentence factoids, even if sourced, creates a list, not an encyclopedia article. Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 02:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the work on the lede. The shorter version is better.

I would like to include the fuller description of the philosophy by the Founder under the Philosophy section and I will try to condense that section.

The matter of classes/promo is important. At the same time, in order to see what Aesthetic Realism is in the real world, there needs to be a description of how the principles apply to subjects. I understand NOR and I’m thinking what to include that’s brief and is sourced properly.

Thanks again for your help. Lore E. Mariano (talk) 01:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at the massive cuts you did on the Poetry section. I think I agree that a long section about poetry may not belong here and I can move that section to the Eli Siegel article; however, since the philosophy is based on poetry (which it still says), the definition of poetry as given by Eli Siegel needs to be put back in. Let me think about it and see how I can do it in the briefest, most efficient way. Unfortunately, I won't be able to get to it for a day or two given work obligations. Lore E. Mariano (talk) 14:21, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The variants of spelling of mate is not trivial as it has caused a great deal of discussion on the article's talk page. You might want to explain your concerns and gain consensus there before you try to delete the content again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that trivia that is sourced can still be trivia in the context of an article. At a minimum, those two paragraphs ought to be thinned out drastically.--Quisqualis (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I thought you may be interested to comment at Talk:Death_of_Harry_Dunn#Interpol_Red_Notice.Ali Beatriz (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I am a young lady not an adult male. If you would like proof I could give you some if you want. I started a Wikipedia account just last year and the reason I started talking to Shadowblade is because I thought their name was a reference from a book series I like, Warriors. As well as Firestar. DaniHart08 (Talk). 13:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, you are another manifestation of the persistent troll of the Teahouse.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit, Quisqualis, however please also note that I had accidentally written my name in the format "Preformatted" and was trying to revert it into the normal text, and so thats why I did it. However, thanks for catching that, and i'll remember that for feature reference. Shadowblade08 (talk) 03:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy hello! I see you recently left a message for Acid Of Carbon. Imo, it was unnecessarily rude, and was assuming bad faith. While its possible they could be a troll or a sock, they are much more likely just a newbie who doesn't quite get how things work around here. We have plenty of people try to do RfA's without understanding how things work. In the future, please make sure to assume good faith. If they're really a problem and they shouldn't be here, we can just block them. No need to tell them to leave. Also, you shouldn't assume folks are socks unless you have evidence. Now if you have evidence they're a sock, then you should open an SPI instead. Smooth sailing, CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, on my talk page. You called me a troll which I'm not. I think all you will do is constantly keep saying it. SO... in that case, never talk to me again or talk on my user talk page. I have muted you now. Thanks. (FYI, you likely got me confused with someone.)Toad62 (talk) 22:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That would depend solely upon your future editing behavior. Please stop your incessant trolling of Wikipedia. If you have made more than one unambiguously constructive edit in your lengthy edit history as a variety of "newbie" trolls, I'd be somewhat shocked.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I kept editing my user page because I felt like something was always missing or the text boxes were off, and that's another thing too, MY USER PAGE. This never affected articles, and plus it's my user page so I should what I want with it and it's not something for you to be the boss of, you can't even make rules because you are not an admin of this website. 2nd off, I am a newbie! My account is only 2 days old. 3rd off you should speak for yourself because you have been nothing but rude to other users. Some messages I have seen on yo