User talk:Nekomancerjade

Hello, Nekomancerjade! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! paul2520 💬 22:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

An article you recently created, Cody Franklin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. It appears you copied a whole 26,000 character section at Talk:2021 United States Capitol protests which caused some confusion. Next time, please check your edits so that stuff like this doesn't have again. Just a mistake we all make. Regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 22:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Extraordinary Writ was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube and IMDb aren't reliable sources, and the remaining references don't establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AlternateHistoryHub and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AlternateHistoryHub, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nekomancerjade! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scythians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypermobility. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Black Death in Poland

added a link pointing to Kaffa

S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chernobyl

added a link pointing to MMO

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chernobyl at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Black Death in Poland at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Black Death in Poland at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a quick machine translation of the section (there is no dedicated article) on this from pl:Czarna śmierć: The plague spread across Europe, possibly with the exception of some islands or other isolated areas. In older historiography, there is a view that the first wave of the Black Death bypassed the Kingdom of Poland and the Czech Republic. This view, however, has been rejected by more recent studies [26]. The reason why this belief persisted for a long time is the very small number of written sources about the epidemic in Poland and the Czech Republic [27] [28]. Although Jan Długosz writes about the plague in his chronicle, his account is considered secondary and not very reliable [26]. In the second half of the century, the forest area in Poland increased, the wages of workers in Kraków increased [29] and grain prices fell. The same phenomena occurred in Western European countries and were clearly linked to the epidemic and the rapid decline in the population which led to a food surplus (and thus a drop in prices) and a shortage of skilled labor (and consequently wage increases) [26]. Taking into account the mechanism of the spread of the disease, it is also unlikely that the plague could spare Poland - a country devoid of significant natural barriers to the east and west, and also surrounded on all sides by lands affected by the epidemic [30] [26]. Sources also note signs of the social crisis in Poland related to the epidemic, i.e. flagellation processions and intensified anti-Semitic moods [26]. For references, see the linked Polish article, Google MT should work pretty well, unless a source not OCRed, feel free to ask me for help. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chernobyl, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the early development of S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2, the studio behind the game was suddenly dissolved? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chernobyl. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chernobyl), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black Death in Poland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Poland was one of the places in Europe least affected by the Black Death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Death in Poland. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Black Death in Poland), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,183 views (848.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Forgotten City logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nekomancerjade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AlternateHistoryHub, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Cum bowl and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 30#Cum bowl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ERBoH logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]