User talk:Noles1984

Talk Page

Noles1984's Talk Page

Click here to go to the main page.

Noles1984 is an author and editor since March 26, 2006. He is located in:

Archives
March 2006 – May 2006 May 2006 – August 2006 August 2006 – December 2007 December 2007 – March 2008

Interesting project you left me a message on. Thanks. Are you interested in the domain wikimotorcycles.org? Bdegroodt (talk) 05:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE wikimotorcycles.org, I am the domain owner and had to terminate the project due to limited time. I'm seeking a buyer of the domain and someone that'll put it to proper use. Bdegroodt (talk) 23:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in any information/photos that you may have on Prince Murat Elementary at the former Dale Mabry Air Base in Tallahassee, FL. I understand that it was moved and renamed as the Southside Elementary School. Then later renamed again to Leonard A. Wesson Elementary School. i have searched and searched and found nothing of the history of this school. I've found relatives of key players that have been apart of this school. That's how i have the information i have. If any more information or photos that you may provide would be most apriative. If you need to contact me my email is christiew@mail.leon.k12.fl.us. Thank you! Willaim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Judoblkbelt (talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider Wikipedia:Dispute resolution after the mess with User:Steven Walling in the Talk:Catahoula Cur area. --Geofferic (talk) 02:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Id be glad to contribute. I looked at the KTM section and would be glad help out. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you though... KTM Jared 683 (talk) 21:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noles, it is good to hear from you. I am sorry to hear you are having trouble though.

I can't quite understand how or why you got directed to WP:ANI. I do see that Red County is a redirect to a mention of a county by that name in an article on a video game. Red county does not exist. I don't see any evidence of you being blocked from editing either one, so I am not sure what is going on.

The way to handle multiple things with the same name is typically through a disambiguation page such as George Bush. If one of the uses is clearly predominate over the others then the simple form can redirect to the most common usage and then a note left at the top of the page. Compare the treatment of George Bush to George Washington, for instance.

In terms of posting at WP:ANI, if you still feel you need to post there, try clicking on a section to edit and then adding your new section at the bottom of that section. Or, try having your post composed and ready to copy/paste. Either of those should help you avoid edit conflicts.

I'm not sure if I've answered your question or not. Please let me know. Thanks, Johntex\^talk 17:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noles. I am a first time wikipedia user and i created a page called Soybean Management Practices. I noticed you commented on the soybean page and was wondering if you could take a look at mine and see what you think. thanks. User:Berkt —Preceding comment was added at 04:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 20:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Gainesville, Florida - in the planning stages, if you're interested. Yeah, I know, but it wouldn't be during a home-game weekend, if that'll help. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Newport Florida rc00182.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• File:Newport Florida RC01254.png
• File:Newport Florida rc02470.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed you have contributed to either or both of the aforementioned articles. If you have any thoughts about whether or not and/or how to merge the pages, please respond at the discussion page of negative pressure wound therapy. Thank you, Where next Columbus? (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sir John Fiennes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The subject of the article never acceded to a peerage and is of genealogical interest only. He can be discussed in the article on his father, whom he predeceased.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Choess (talk) 01:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Astian, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Piacenzian. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Concord School Miccosukee Floridapr07084.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yintaɳ  21:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't noticed the company was defunct, my apologies. Yintaɳ  21:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from G-W Invader, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Yintaɳ  21:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Noles1984. I was just looking at the March of Dimes logo that you uploaded in 2006 and it appears that they have changed their logo. Would you be able to replace the logo for them and also add it to their Wikipedia page? You can find the new logo at marchofdimes.com On the first page of the site they have some javascript blocking the "save as" ability for the logo, but you can save it off of any other section on the site. Thanks, Geoff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:March_Of_Dimes_Logo.png Geoffgarcia (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you have been linking some dates at Horatio C. Newcomb recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an temporary Arbcom injunction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although there is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work adding the Infoboxes to the ordinal Congress articles. While you're at it, you can eliminate the "Dates of sessions" section and make sure there's a TOClimit template there too. See Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Congress/Ordinal congresses#Lede for more info.—Markles 15:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

High Noles,

Per wp:minor, edits that change the meaning of an article shouldn't normally be marked as minor. Looking at your recent contributions, I see they're all marked as minor... perhaps you've inadvertantly ticked the "Mark all edits minor by default" check box in the Editing tab of your user preferences? Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 15:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In a nutshell, a minor edit is one that could never be the subject of any kind of dispute. For example, fixing a typo, making a spelling correction, and reverting unambiguous vandalism are all minor edits. Anything else should be considered a major edit, and if you're ever unsure, it's safest not to mark an edit as minor. The importance is that some editors choose to hide minor edits when viewing page histories or recent changes so they can focus on substantive changes.

Nice work on all the new articles, by the way :-) Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 16:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a matter of which one I prefer, it's a matter of which one is true. One says the grey wolf originated 300,000 years ago; the other says it originated 3,400,000 years ago. I reverted to the 300,000 year version because it was cited, and because Grey wolf has been a featured article for a long time and still has lots of people working on it, so I doubted there was a gigantic error in the lead. Perhaps it's the Canidae family as a whole that originated 3.4 million years ago, and not the grey wolf specifically? I'm only guessing. Anyway, I need to go to bed, so if you want to discuss it more it would be best to use Talk:Grey Wolf. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 16:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstood my request for clarification at the above article. The text at present states that the Amphicyonidae belong to the sub-family Amphicyoninae. Clearly, that isn't what you mean to say (and, indeed, isn't what the source quoted says), so I was asking what the sentence is intended to mean. In other words, when you say "these taxa belong to...", which taxa are you talking about? The text needs clarification, so that the reader can understand what you're saying here. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 13:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that makes more sense now. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It makes about as much sense as doing so for the wolf and coyote articles. Mariomassone (talk) 16:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Technically speaking, only those genera in the same subfamily should be included as "sister genera," not all the genera in the same family.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not all authorities agree with the synonymy of Eoentelodon with Brachyhyops. Furthermore, you should not request that a synonymized taxon page: redirect it, instead.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neither, given as how more recent studies shows that Eoentelodon has is distinct from Brachyhyops, and is apparently more closely related to Proentelodon [1]--Mr Fink (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah fair enough. Well I am no expert in these standing rules so however you think it is appropriate for the article. I guess you can just paste the refs at the end of every paragraph (apart from the fact that they are very similar in wording) to make it look as an inline citation but yeah, however you think is best. Cheers!Calaka (talk) 08:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Florida_State_Seminoles_football#Uniform_Combinations There is debate about whether to show every possible combination of FSU uniforms or just the ones that have been used. Basically this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fsuunis.jpg versus this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ACC-Uniform-combination-FSU.PNG User Kevin W claims that he is seeking "uniformity" with other college football pages that show every possibly combination, without regard for their actual use. I disagree. Why show combinations that have not and will not be used? I remember you being a contributor to the page and I am asking for more input and help as others are now agreeing with me but Kevin won't stop. Thanks. AriGold (talk)

(archived)

(archived)

The article Bethlehem Missionary Baptist Church (Florida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

tagged with reference concerns for months, claims of notability not backed up with citations

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noles,

Just a reminder that wp: paleontology is for extinct taxon articles to stop at the genus level and for species levels to redirect to the genus. Please merge the information in teh Hipparion species articles you created into the genus page and make the species pages redirects. --Kevmin (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noles1984, just wanted to say: I started to italicize all the genus and species names in the list in this new article. However I may not be able to finish doing it, since I have a lot of stuff to do in Real Life and in WikiProject Gastropods. If you have time, you may want to finish italicizing the names yourself. Let me know if you have any trouble working out which names are family names and therefore not italicized (they end in -idae), and so forth. All good wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 23:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wrote the above article and I'm noting your edits to it. Two issues concern me. The first is the language bordering on jargon in this passage: the Florida peninsula was a shallow eutropical subsea known as the Dade Subsea, the first of many subseas of the Oligocene Okeechobean Sea. For readers unfamiliar with geology (and I count myself among them), this statement has very little meaning. I am not afraid of being technical, but is there a way we can work to make this relevant to casual readers? Before the edit it read the Florida peninsula was a shallow sea floor. Noting that "sea" is used four times in what replaced it (Tony1's head would explode if he read it), there must be a bridge between "sea floor" and the linking of eutropical subsea.

The second issue is the removal of cited content (well, and the fact that the above is not cited) in the sentence The peninsula has been covered by sea water at least seven times since the earliest bedrock formation. Why reason do you have of taking this out? It is a very reliable source. Thank you. --Moni3 (talk) 21:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You removed cited information in the Everglades article without an explanation. You inserted a sentence about the Hawthorne Formation in the Geography and ecology of the Everglades article with an incomplete citation. I have reverted both edits because these are GA and FA class articles, respectively, and your edits do not seem to improve the quality of the articles.

The Everglades article has the more in-depth discussion about the geology underneath the Everglades, where all five geologic formations that comprise the southern tip of the Florida peninsula are included. A link in the Geography and ecology of the Everglades article directs interested readers to this section. It is perplexing why only the Hawthorne Formation would be discussed (in the Geology and ecology of the Everglades article where only a brief summary of geologic issues exists) when other formations such as the Miami Limestone and the Fort Thompson Formation affect the soil and plant life of the Everglades more profoundly. I am not trying to own these articles, but maintain them with very high standards. Communicating what you are trying to achieve would be helpful. I am not opposing incorporating new or different information as long as it is well-cited and reliable and adds to the overall comprehensiveness of the articles. --Moni3 (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - This ongoing discussion may interest you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:FSU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.254.7.36 (talk) 19:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind if I pinch this one to put on my page too. :) - The Bushranger (talk) 21:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. I tweaked it a little to add the Tallahasse flag, that version's here if you want. :) - The Bushranger (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The picture - Lake Iamonia gallery004 boat ramp.jpg - is that on the north side? It looks like Bull Headley Landing to me? - The Bushranger (talk) 03:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Always neat to recognise the location in a pic! - The Bushranger (talk) 17:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Chaires High School2 rc05541.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you remove the categories from your sandbox? I was cleaning up a category and noticed that your sandbox is listed in the category. Thanks. 71.77.20.119 (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The ones I see are "United States Senate" and "Parliamentary procedure". 71.77.20.119 (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:San_Luis_Marker.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_Airport_Opening01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_Regional_Airport_gr0595.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_Police_Dept_rc03461.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_Florida_pr11216.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_City_Hall_n038810.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

I think here you added some wrong information to Megantereon. The given source for example des not say, that Megantereon had a fossil range between 10.4 and 1.8 Million years... and that is definitely wrong. So I reverted your edit.--Altaileopard (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The oldest fossil evidence I can find is:

• Asia, Punjab, Pakistan, est. age: 11.61—5.33 Ma. John Finarelli, Ph.D., University of Michigan. March 28, 2002.
• Europe, Seneze (Domeyrat), France. Est age: 5.33—0.011 Ma. A. Turner, Ph.D., Liverpool John Moores University, H. O'Regan, Ph.D, Sept 6, 2004.
• N. America, U.S. (Florida). Est age: 7.9—7.8 Ma (Appearance Event Ordination), Nick Pyenson, Ph.D., University of California-Berkely[2] and Mark D. Uhen, Ph.D., George Mason University, [3] Sept. 27, 1993.

I believe the specimen from N. America will be the most accurate since it does use the AEO method for more exact dating.

Also, why are you using a category inclusion on this discussion page?

Noles1984 (talk) 01:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC), Reviewer, TALK TO ME HERE[reply]

Please give references and not nonsense like this!!!

• Seneze, where Megantereon (specimen SE311) was indeed found, is a locality of Late Villafrancian age dating to arround 2.2-1.5 Mya! (Christiansen, Adolfssen: Osteology and ecology of Megantereon cultridens SE311 (Mammalia; Felidae; Machairodontinae), a sabrecat from the Late Pliocene – Early Pleistocene of Senéze, France Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, Volume 151 Issue 4, Pages 833 - 884)
• "The earliest presence of Megantereon is recorded at 4·5 Ma in the Bone Valley Formation (Florida), where it is represented by M. cultridens."(Arribas, A., Palmqvist, P., 1999. On the Ecological Connection Between Sabre-tooths and Hominids: Faunal Dispersal Events in the Lower Pleistocene and a Review of the Evidence for the First Human Arrival in Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 26, 571–585.)
• The fossils of a cat the Tugen Hills, Kenya (Late Miocene, 5.7 Ma) can probably be identified as Megantereon. The authors write: "If our identification of the tooth as ?Megantereon obscura is correct, it would join Megantereon hesperus from North America (Berta and Galiano, 1983) as the oldest known species in the world."(Morales, J., Pickford, M., Soria, D., 2005. Carnivores from the Late Miocene and Basal Pliocene of the Tugen Hills, Kenia. Revista de la Sociedad Geologica de Espana, 18 (1-2).
• Megantereon surived in Asia until about 500.000 years ago (Agusti, J., Antón, M., 2002. Mammoths, Sabertooths and Hominids 65 Million Years of Mammalian Evolution in Europe. Columbia University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-231-11640-3)

It is very sad, that some people obviously try to waste good time of users... perhaps in order to destroy a projekt.--Altaileopard (talk) 09:40, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

and not nonsense like this!!![edit]

Whatever links or info you placed on my discussion page was nothing I entered and not my sources. You need to recheck the entries and watch your manners. Again, why are you applying a category to this page? Noles1984 (talk) 23:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You gave only some links to university guys. That is not a reference!!!!! --Altaileopard (talk) 23:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those were suggestions not references and I'm not in the habit of doing other people's work. If I get time I'll alter Megantereon. Also, when you communicate you need not use more than one (!) exclamation point. Noles1984 (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noles1984! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

Welcome to the project. --Kumioko (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.--Kumioko (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Starting with the February 2011 issue WikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also:

1. Portal:United States
2. the United States Wikipedians Noticeboard
3. the United States Wikipedians collaboration of the Month - The collaboration article for February is Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
4. and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you.

You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 20:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Blue Buffalo Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phearson (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 00:59, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:24, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
. --Kumioko (talk) 15:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ivan Munroe 1961.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:47, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts. There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Horseshoe Plantation pr08630.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Horseshoe Plantation rc19243.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Irving Berlin (editor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. One uncredited acting role and while he may have had a significant career as an editor, film and tv editors generally get little or no coverage. None was found in this case.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 06:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tallahassee Winter Festival05.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:18, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 02:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that the WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest

will start on Friday, October 21.

Smallbones (talk) 01:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you created or contributed to several articles on extinct cetaceans. You've put that certain genera existed for a certain period of time (e.g. 47-36 mya). Aren't those the estimated dates from the formation they were found in and not the period of time they existed? The sources you cited simply give those age ranges, but didn't specifically say the genera in question existed for say 11 million years. SaberToothedWhale (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AmFlag-BetsyRoss.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:18, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Night Stalker02.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tallahassee Fire Department rc00981.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Night Stalker01.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AvoDerm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janice Harsanyi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 06:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lake Wawasee Buttermilk Point p0391.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 03:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Leon High School rc00665.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

I've noted that a similar upload is tagged as public domain. Could this be re-tagged also to sidestep the NFCC issue? CT Cooper · talk 22:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Harri Hursti.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Magnolia Florida Cemetery rc13818.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fromm Family logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Pet Foods until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Diamond Pet Foods.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]