User talk:Qrfqr

Welcome!

Hello, Qrfqr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! V. Molotov 20:07, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to overstep my bounds and reformat your response, but another reader seems to have misread your comment as part of my nomination and thought this was a merge request. Please revisit the page briefly and format to distinguish between us. Durova 21:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I asked the deletion of Image:Lusophoneworld.JPG, because a new and better map is avalable on http://commons.wikimedia.org . See Image:Lusophoneworld.JPG, or the article Lusophone. You can write on the new one than this one was made from your work. yug

For what I know, Brazil, Portugal are the 2 only "true" native portuguese speaker. I read all this in the article, and improvement were discuted in the talk page of the map (on wiki engliah or commons). I don't know more, and I don't speak portuguese. Map and legend can be improve to be more clear.Yug (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I thinking about the same problem for the last month, when it become clear that most of "war of edition" about maps (such as this about Portuguese) were because of the different understanding of "Portuguese speaker (country)", and "true native speaker".

I propose to make an article about this topic, talking about the different possible ways, and then taking a conclusion. I haven't enought academic knowledge about this, but I can put some good ideas about this, and others will be able crosscheck this.

For the moment, we can read "native speaker". They, we can work on and other article, or to improve this one with a clear conclusion-definition.

Yug

Thanks for uploading Image:S5310.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Do you have a reference for this addition? Such references can only improve wikipedia's reliability, which is currently it's biggest criticism. thanks! --Merbabu 02:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean you found the information on other language wikipedias? Unfortunately Wikipedia cannot cite itself. If, however, these other language references have an external reference, why not use that? it's not obligatory to use English references only. --Merbabu 02:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That link you provided looks fine. I'll put it into the article for you. Nice work and cheers. --Merbabu 02:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Japanisation, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Japanisation is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Japanisation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just wondering what your source is for the world map you've uploaded to the page 'Western Culture'. Just curious, hope you don't mind letting me know! Cheers Sthoma07 (talk) 02:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The only alteration I did on the old version of the map is to Bosnia. I made the alteration according to DemoBIH2006aa.PNG based on Clash_of_Civilizations_map.png which is the old map. Qrfqr (talk) 15:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just wondering why you replaced the shan-geo-stub template with burma-geo-stub in this edit. As far as I know, usually we use the most specific category/stub possible, which in this case is Shan State. But I wanted to check with you before reverting. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 18:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see—so the Kokang region is geographically within the same area as Shan State, but politically it's independent of it?

I'm just trying to get my bearings; I recently started the Kokang incident article and found that coverage of Burma issues on en-wiki has a lot of big holes, including this one (I had to do a lot of Google searching and reading articles on zh-wiki before I could find out where Kokang is).

By the way, Kokang incident is on the main page right now and will probably have a lot of traffic from vandals or POV-pushers, so I'll need all the help I can get from people who know a lot about Burma to help ensure accuracy and NPOV. If you're interested, feel free to add it to your watchlist. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 18:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for your remind. If you feel it appropriate, I think Laukkai can be listed under Shan State and Burma at the same time. Qrfqr (talk) 18:59, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 19:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another question....do you know the geographical coordinates of Laukkai? It would be useful to add a locator/pushpin map to the article, using Template:Location map Burma and the {{Location map}} syntax, but I don't know the exact coordinates. (this is the most specific map I've found so far.) The Kokang article could also use a map to show where exactly SR-1 is. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 19:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my attempt:

Laukkai

Laukkai (Myanmar)

How does that look? rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 19:21, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that looks great. I didn't find the coordinates of Laukkai, I just found that of Kokang, which is 23°24'54N - 24°09'24N, 98°24'14E - 98°53'42E. Dunno if you read Chinese, here's an article: [1], and the article mentioned a place named 諸葛炮樓山(Zhugepaoloushan). In google maps, if you input 23.7 N, 98.7 E, you will see a place called 炮樓山(Paoloushan). I suspected that the two places are the same one. If so, you're looking at the map of the area around Kokang. Qrfqr (talk) 19:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's pretty much the same area that I found as well. There is no Laukkai on the map, but there is a Laukkaing, which I assume is more or less the same thing. I do read Chinese, and that article looks like an excellent resource for both the Kokang and Kokang people articles; thanks! rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 19:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. Here's a page [2] with a photo and coordinates of Laukai/Laukkai. Another page with maps of Kokang in more detail. [3] Some pictures in this one. [4] Qrfqr (talk) 20:17, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an opinion on Talk:Kokang rebellion#Name change? rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 05:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think at this stage a more neutral word such as incident would be more proper. Qrfqr (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry because I accidentally click to the revert button. You ignored my reason and YellowMonkey reason without a proper reason, is this a constructive edit?--AM ^(talk) 15:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to 3RR, I won't revert anymore today (notice: you had violated this policy by revert 4 times in one day). I still keep my point.--AM ^(talk) 14:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my response in the discussion page. Thank you. Qrfqr (talk) 15:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will replace your image with the character 陳暠.--AM ^(talk) 16:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I could satisfy your need by putting an external link to the online version of Dai Viet Su Ky Toan Thu and I will write an article about Tran Cao of Later Tran Dynasty but I need your answer to my question about the relevance of 陳暠 in the article. I'm sorry if my question is bothering you but I'm so sick of these Han Tu-related issues. (talk:Chua Bo De, talk:An Giang, talk:Ngô Dynasty).--AM ^(talk) 17:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank a lot for your work, if you found anything weird in Vietnam-related articles, please feel free to leave me a message; I will help in correcting as soon as I'm online.--AM ^(talk) 17:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Qrfqr, good to see you again.--AM ^(talk) 00:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 2010 Chile earthquake. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

• Click here to see your habit of not providing edit summaries. Happy Editing!--220.101.28.25 (talk) 03:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.

• Seriously, why aren't you providing an Edit Summary? To my surprise this isn't the first time I've asked you about this! Other editors have too! How about at least an acknowledgement you have read this request? --220.101.28.25 (talk) 11:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, I've read that. Thanks for reminding. Qrfqr (talk) 11:14, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answering Qrfqr, I AGF but I don't hold out great hopes of seeing many edit summaries from you as you have rarely done them over the last 4 ¾ years! 6% for major edits! Please? All you have to say is 'expanding text', 'add reference', 'fix typo' or similar shorthand. See wp:Edit summary legend for a few common abbreviations.
You also missed a chance to revert some 'vandalism' on the May 2010 Sumatra earthquake article, see this [5]. Give it a go, vandal 'whacking' is fun! Regards, --220.101.28.25 (talk) 14:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qrfqr. You have new messages at Talk:2010 Southeast Taiwan earthquake.
Message added 19:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aditya Ex Machina 19:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1998 Ryukyu Islands earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor event with dubious notability. Title appears to have been made up by the article creator and any earthquake in Japan recording a maximum intensity of shindo 3 is incredibly minor.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DAJF (talk) 06:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I do not think that your reason for proposing deletion is convincing. Qrfqr (talk) 08:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, 1998 Ryukyu Islands earthquake, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998 Ryukyu Islands earthquake. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --DAJF (talk) 23:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qrfqr, I started building an article on this earthquake when you added it to the list of 20th century earthquakes, but I see that you got there first. I've expanded it and converted the bare url refs, you should probably check whether my guesses as to the titles of some of those in japanese are anywhere near correct. I'm planning to nominate this at WP:DYK, unless you have any objections, with both of us credited as creators. Mikenorton (talk) 11:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Mikenorton, I can see that you have made a preparation on this article. Actually what you wrote took a good part of the current version of this article. You can be the sole creator. I just like adding articles of past earthquakes. Thanks for your offer. Qrfqr (talk) 13:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll add you anyway, you won't need to do anything, just accept that DYK credit when it comes your way - you can always delete it. Mikenorton (talk) 16:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On July 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1978 Miyagi earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you have a lot of image uploads for which you give the source as "USGS", but don't give the URL. Could you please change the pages to show the full URL? Thanks! Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Im confused about that earthquake. I can't find any info explaining why they removed it. So, I'll remove it as I now realize that the only source of that earthquake is the one I posted.--Andres arg (talk) 17:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Ironholds (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am wondering if you would consider moving this to Fukushima I nuclear accidents instead, as it is about the nuclear accidents rather than the earthquake, thanks. --Pontificalibus (talk) 13:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1953 Suva earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1953 Suva earthquake caused the collapse of an 800-metre (2,600 ft) long section of barrier reef, triggering a tsunami and damaging submarine cables? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qrfqr, I forgot to tell you that I had nominated this one. Just accept this as some recognition for all the earthquake articles that you've started, I'm always happy to follow on and expand. Mikenorton (talk) 08:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help, I'm intending to expand your latest when I get the chance. Cheers, Mikenorton (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qrfqr, I've nominated this at DYK - just to keep you informed. Mikenorton (talk) 19:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Qrfqr (talk) 19:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1994 Offshore Sanriku earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1994 Offshore Sanriku earthquake is considered an "ultra-slow" earthquake, as slip continued for more than a year afterwards? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 2011 Sikkim earthquake. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Karthik Nadar (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Qrfqr! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In List of earthquakes in Japan, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Miyagi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, working towards consensus means working toward a version that is acceptable to all parties. Blind reverting someone because you prefer your wording does not in any way further the process. Instead of just reverting my changes you should start from there and work back in the smell if you really think it is that important (but seriously, what else are a pile of dead nbodies going to smell like. Just because one article out of 2000 on the subject mentioned they stink doesn't mean we have to.) Insisting you are right and reverting over and over again is not appropriate, you don't OWN the article and anyone is absolutely free to edit your text if they don't like it (just as you are free to EDIT mine - what you are not free to do is edit war because you want your wording preserved. --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:51, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons why I didn't agree with some of your edits are given in article talk page. I just want to remind you, while I added something again and again and again, don't forget who's the one who insisted in deleting it again and again and again (and started it). Qrfqr (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 1943 Central Java earthquake, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 1943 Central Java earthquakes. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 15:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 1968 Tokachi earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aomori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qrfqr, just letting you know that I'm about to nominate this article at DYK, once I've thought of a hook - maybe I'll use the fact that more people died in DRC in the May 18 aftershock than in the original earthquake. Cheers, Mikenorton (talk) 20:46, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Qrfqr (talk) 15:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When I got there I found that User:Carabinieri had already nominated it. Mikenorton (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 1966 Toro earthquake at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Empathictrust (talk) 23:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Qrfqr, I've made the requested changes - mainly page numbers in that UNESCO report. Mikenorton (talk) 08:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits! Qrfqr (talk) 16:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1966 Toro earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a large aftershock following the 1966 Toro earthquake caused more deaths in the Democratic Republic of Congo than the original earthquake? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1966 Toro earthquake.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page of the ABC newspaper was originally listed as 17, but there was not any earthquake-related material on that page, and that's why I looked on some of the other pages in that day's edition. I found, on page 15 (this would be nine days after the mainshock) some material. Is that the page that you're referring to? If it is, that should be changed in the article. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 18:41, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've got it now. I was having a hard time finding what I was looking for there. Thanks for your help! Dawnseeker2000 19:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Con mucho gusto and also thanks for your contribution to the article. Qrfqr (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1981 Playa Azul earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1981 Playa Azul earthquake ruptured the central part of the Michoacán seismic gap? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1981 Playa Azul earthquake. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guiyi Circuit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Son of Heaven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guiyi Circuit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Later Han Dynasty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1911 Kikai Island earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fukushima (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1931 Zangezur earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zangezur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the title back to how it was since I didn't realize outburst is actually a technical name for this kind of incident, thanks for informing me on this. Stormchaser89 (talk) 9:43, 19 April 2013 (US Central)

Stop edit warring at Brahmi script or I will ask to have you blocked. You'll need something better than a high-school principal from 1797 if you want to contradict modern scholarship. If you think your edit is justified, take it to talk and convince people. — kwami (talk) 00:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hope that your "modern scholarship" is not based on the accounts of Megasthenes, in which there are inconsistencies about writing in India at that time. Qrfqr (talk) 05:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to improve this article in terms of accuracy and English, but need help from someone who can read the sources and understands the concepts. Please leave a note on my talk-page if you are interested. Cheers! Shir-El too 02:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response; it looks like we both visit here as time allows. I will edit the article for English and ask you to check it out - I don't want to miss or mess up anything important through ignorance. Cheers! Shir-El too 19:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, for the time being. I myself would like to know how he succeeded to the Dragon Throne with 4 brothers ahead of him?. Cheers! Shir-El too 13:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC) PS Other points need to be clarified/expanded. Cheers! Shir-El too 14:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2009 Fiji earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No damage, injuries, or deaths. This appears to have been a non-event. This is not surprising. In the twentieth-century alone, there have been seven M7 or greater events near Fiji. None were significant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dawnseeker2000 03:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discovered text (archaeology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discovered text (archaeology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 20:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qrfqr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2007 Mariana Islands earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Mariana Islands earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dawnseeker2000 16:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qrfqr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hispanophile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hispanophile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  19:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qrfqr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Chingdrol Dolma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SITH (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:LoloishInST.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no information on an encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:ChineseInST.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:ChineseInST.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]