User talk:SqlPac

I have a hard time understanding the scope of this project. A seperate section of "Scope" with some example articles would help to start this off. Aquarius • talk 17:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, do you have an example page I can look at as a guide? Thanks again!SqlPac 19:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The best place to start is the WikiProject Council/Guide. RichardF 00:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard, I have that page bookmarked and have read through it. I was actually asking Aquarius for a sample page that shows an example of what he's looking for - like a particular project as a demo. Thanks again! SqlPac 00:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. How about these examples - WikiProject Architecture, WikiProject Computer science, WikiProject Electronics, WikiProject Energy development, WikiProject Mathematics? RichardF 00:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I'll check them out! Again, much appreciated! SqlPac 01:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Yeah, I know, section headers are to be initial caps only. Sorry, but this must be shouted. Thank you very much for launching WikiProject Databases!

LOL, thanks JD. That's the nicest thing anyone's said to me since I've been contributing to this thing. Appreciate it :) SqlPac 23:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Professor_X_The_Overseer.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Closedmouth (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What tool did you use to create the database schemas?

Graingert (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Be afraid.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Concepts db1.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Components db1.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SqlPac. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for using the same sample schema and pseudo-code query for the Star schema and Snowflake schema pages. Made it real easy to understand the differences by comparing the diagrams side by side! MeekMark (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Null (SQL) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]