User talk:Stebunik

This user comes from Slovenia.

Today is beatification of Lojze Grozde in Celje, Slovenia, Europe. See news!--Stebunik (talk) 08:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I suggest replacing the picture in the English article with the photo from the Slovenian version of the article (http://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slika:Lojze_Grozde_foto.jpg). The current picture simply repeats the one already seen on the book cover. Doremo (talk) 07:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. I cannot do it. Let you replace. Thank you!--Stebunik (talk) 08:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I prooved to replace picture, but withouth success. But now I think, that the painting corresponds, maybe? --Stebunik (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{hangon}}

A tag has been placed on Jožef Kerec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 04:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let the page Jožef Kerec remain. He was great Slovenian missionary and architect in China.--Stebunik (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Jožef Kerec, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jožef Kerec. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 07:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jožef Kerec was apostolic vicar in Junan in China. Later he was missionary in other parts of Asia. He is the most important missionary from Prekmurje, Eastern district of Slovenia. Slovenia has now six dioceses, but before only two. So was every bishop or vicar known. Kerec is important as Catholic Slovenian missionary (one of most important). I think, he has his place in Wikipedia. Now I have not more time to write about him, but in future maybe. I do not remember now, what I wrote. I think, that it was not many.--Stebunik (talk) 20:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why speedly deletion from Wikipedia's page? Wikipedia created this page of Slovenian missionaries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Slovenian_missionaries

Most biographies are not written. I will, that article of Kerec remain! --Stebunik (talk) 21:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the message. Please read WP:BIO, one of our articles which describes the minimum criteria for biographies to not get deleted. Kindly also read WP:RS, an article that describes that for any article, every statement has to be supported by reliable sources. Please also leave your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jožef Kerec where the deletion discussions are taking place. If you have access to reliable sources that prove the statements written in the article, please put them in the article (read WP:CITE for guidelines). Please feel free to ask my help for anything. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 10:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We have transferred your article to the following page. User:Stebunik/Jožef_Kerec. Please feel free to add information and sources to the article as and when you can. When you believe you've done good work on it, please feel free to write back to me directly and I'll give you my feedback. Warm regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 12:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can not understand, why is deleted my picture of Lojze Grozde in Commons from Abigor. It was in Infobox for Lojze Grozde. Now I have all licenses (from photograph and from autor), but I can not, how to use them, that the photo come back again. The name of photo was: Perko Lojze-Grozde 99.jpg If you can, help. Thank you! I can not now work with more articles, I have other work.--Stebunik (talk) 21:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Slovenia? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Eleassar my talk 10:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Stebunik, to the WikiProject Slovenia! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Slovenia-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Slovenia}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

• The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
• Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

• Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
• Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
• Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
• Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
• Expand: Education in Slovenia
• Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
• NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
• Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
• Help assess the quality of 35 unassessed articles
• Take/Add requested photographs

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! --Eleassar ^{my talk} 10:12, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We have more than enough photos in the article at the moment. Please don't add more. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can edit neutral section Josip Broz Tito#Historical criticism because POV pusher DIREKTOR has this topic ban despite suspect of socks with PRODUCER: wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DIREKTOR/Archive. This version was removed by an admin for suspect of socks but you can edit better version: later I shall support you. Regards--Tiblocco (talk) 15:18, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Franc Ksaver Meško requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 04:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment, you are right. Unfortunately sk:Preklady_Biblie#Sloven.C4.8Dina does not have much information. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irenaeus (Bulović), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miroslav Bulešić, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Blessed and Istra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited István Sándor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blessed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miroslav Bulešić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SDB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miroslav Bulešić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SDB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These disambiguations will be resolved, one of them is already.--Stebunik (talk) 21:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zoltán Meszlényi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[http://www.albertfalviplebania.hu/meszlenyi_eletrajz.pdf Biography (from Magyar Kurir]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{hangon}}

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marija Brenčič Jelen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marija Brenčič Jelen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eleassar ^{my talk} 20:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was not good idea to delete article Marija Brenčič Jelen. Under communism were Christian orientation's writers, poets ecc. (dissidents) persecuted, and they not came to encyclopedias, on radio, TV or in newspapers. Marija was Christian poet and writer in the time of titoism. About Marija Brenčič Jelen exists rather great literature in Slovenian, and her opus is nice and great. Article was short, but it can be wider. I think, let you give back the article!--Stebunik (talk) 20:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Vandor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages America and Moca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Done.--Stebunik (talk) 09:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I commented on the talk page regarding duplicated coats of arms. --71.178.50.222 (talk) 20:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Domitian of Carantania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Idol and Crown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Domitian of Carantania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gorica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I looked for the disambiguation page Gorica. I did not find it in my article of Domitian of Carantania.--Stebunik (talk) 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stebunik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stebunik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stebunik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stebunik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mirko Štefković, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Snowycats (talk) 18:34, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I begun it, but I can not enough good English, so translate article from Croatian somebody Croate. For now I will do not do on this article in English, maybe in Slovenian. You can good English, why do you not translate this article on English Wikipedia?--Stebunik (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Stebunik/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Stebunik/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stebunik! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mirko Štefković, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stebunik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mirko Štefković".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stebunik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! 5a5ha seven (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been contributing to Wikipedia for 15 years in several languages, especially in Slovenian, as it is my mother tongue. Something like today has never happened to me. Today I was compiling an article on the Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia about a well-known pro-life worker called Dr. Anton Lisec. It is understood that the article did not yet have all the necessary additions, such as external links, literature, notes - as it was still in the making. While writing, there is a user: Edgar A. Poe

He simply deleted the article twice with some arguments that are not accurate. I think that in the background is only his intolerance towards those who have a different point of view on certain things, so doctor Anton Lisec defended life against abortus. I think that such an act is an outrageous insolence and it would be right if this user was warned about it. The article, which is still in the making, cannot yet be equipped with the entire critical apparatus. I wanted to add that. That this doctor Anton Lisec is not an insignificant personality is shown by the fact that 102,000 results appear on the Internet (today, 10.II.2024). I wonder how an administrator on Wikipedia can be such a dictator who deletes himself without first consulting with others or for others to present their arguments. I think that such behavior is possible and acceptable only in the Balkans, where the laws of general civilization are not respected, but the government is not the one that has arguments, but force.--Stebunik (talk) 00:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, without a valid argument, he first threatened to delete and then also deleted my article about the book "Pope Dictator", which was actually just a translation of the article in English, where it is marked as a "good article". Thank you for your understanding and possible intervention.--Stebunik (talk) 00:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User Edgar Alan Poe is even so brazen that he deleted my entire user page a while ago. They don't do that on any Wikipedia. Previously, the Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia was tolerant - but now this user-admin acts as a ruthless dictator.--Stebunik (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know to what extent publication was prohibited, because it was not a long text or any new findings, but actually only information that is obvious from the book itself, which was published in 1674 and therefore not subject to copyright. As you can see, I agreed to the intervention and did not re-enter the same, but I added some other little things that are not related to the mentioned copyrighted rights. Therefore, please remove the above warning as it is no longer necessary. I understood it, but someone else won't edit it, I hope. Stebunik (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Symmetria iuridico Austriaca has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josip Ujčić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gorica. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote in article: Gorizia (Gorica).--Stebunik (talk) 19:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]