User talk:Sudipto Surjo

Hello, Sudipto Surjo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shuvro, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 13:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, the article 'Shuvro' is an article about a famous character created Humayun Ahmed. Humayun Ahmed's Himu and Misir Ali already have their own wikipedia page. Shuvro, Himu and Misir Ali are the recurring characters created by Ahmed. Shuvro deserves its own article, and Toughpigs has most kindly fixed the issues, please review it again, you'll see all the issues are solved, citations are added, references are increased. I am hopeful that it will be removed from nominations for deletion.

Hello, Sudipto Surjo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shuvro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. PROD added to give author a fighting chance to sort out referencing We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this article survive (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 13:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shuvro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuvro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ——Serial ^# 13:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only defence to this is a solid set of referencing.

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

I have created one reference a few minutes ago, but it has limited value because it is a Primary Source.

When you have achieved the real, solid references you need then come to the deletion discussion and tell the discussion what you have achieved. Even then the consensus may be against you. Fiddle Faddle 15:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Shuvro, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sudipto Surjo, I'm afraid that some people have not been very kind to you here. You created an article about a worthwhile, interesting subject. I had never heard of Shuvro or even Humayun Ahmed before today, and now, thanks to you, I know more about Bengali literature than I did before. :) Please let me know if I can help you at any time. You can write on my talk page here, if you need me: User talk:Toughpigs. — Toughpigs (talk) 03:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sudipto Surjo, I want to show you how to sign talk page messages like this one. When you write a message, you type these four characters at the end: ~~~~

When you save your edit, those characters will automatically become your name and the date.

One more tip: When you reply to someone on a talk page, you should put a : before your post. That character indents the post, so that it's easier to tell where your comment begins. If you're responding to a post that is already indented with a : then you should add :: before your message. Let me know if you have any trouble.

I think that the Shuvro article is going to be fine; we have good sources now. The Articles for Deletion discussion will go on for about a week — that's always the way that they work, it doesn't mean that it's going badly. I wish you well. — Toughpigs (talk) 18:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, you have been very nice to me. And I'm pretty new to wikipedia, so your help is very valuable for me. Thank you! (I'm also hopeful for Shuvro, Thanks again!)

--Suborno Sabbir (talk) 02:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Harsh 2580. An edit you recently made to Baker Bhai seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Harsh 03:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for my incorrect reversion of your edit. - Harsh 03:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

]

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wind of Change (Bangladeshi TV program), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Prince Mahmud, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Captain Calm (talk) 09:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are doing a great work by adding references to the articles. Just keep in mind that we don't use citations or footnotes in the section headings as directed in MOS:HEADINGS. You can add some prose under the heading to cite sources at the articles. --Zayeem ^(talk) 17:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...--Suborno Sabbir (talk) 03:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Rocket (disambiguation) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ferdous Wahid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alam Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Ahmed Fazal) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When another editor objects to your recreation of an article previously deleted following an AfD discussion, you should make your case for the article on the talk page (and ping involved editors) rather than simply reinstating your edits. In this case, because this is a biography of a musician known primarily for their work in a notable band you are going to need to demonstrate that Fazal meets notability guidelines based on coverage about their work outside of Nova. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Music of Bengal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azam Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Should be rewritten in a formal tone without praising the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Renaissance (Bangladeshi band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Renaissance (Bangladeshi band), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucky Akhand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rafiqul Islam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Feluda into Feluda (series). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We typically keep recent-most images that are of good quality in the infobox, not decades old images. We can add those in relevant sections. See MOS:LEADIMAGE. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK...--Sudipto Surjo (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Star Wars spinoffs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Please stop messing around with this page. Deb (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Star Wars, you may be blocked from editing. Nemov (talk) 12:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nemov: Are You Talking About Removing the "Full list" Part From The Infobox? The Skywalker Saga and Anthology films both lead to the List of Star Wars films Article, So I Thought That a "Full list" Header Was Not Needed.--Sudipto Surjo (talk) 04:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you remove something from a page, explain your changes. Thanks. - Nemov (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Beetlejuice, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: There is no poster block.....? The only credit I see is "Michael Keaton is Beetlejuice" --Sudipto Surjo (talk) 15:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there's a poster block. Just because you have bothered to look at it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Don't be ridiculous. Sundayclose (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Sudipto Surjo. Sundayclose (talk) 15:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at T. E. Lawrence. Stop adding tags without explanation. Nemov (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nemov: Woah...Woah...Woah! That's Disruption? I Added Template:Indiana Jones Because a fictionalized version of Mr. Lawrence Appeared in a Mainstream Media of the Franchise. Could You Please Tell Me What Exactly Did I 'Disrupt'?

Please stop trying to alter the order of the photos of the cast members for the Star Wars sequel trilogy. You've already been reverted multiple times on this and your edits are altering the photos to remove the prominence and billing orders of the cast members. Please stop changing the orders to your preferred order, at least without getting consensus for this on the talk page. Canterbury Tail talk 13:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK--Sudipto Surjo (talk) 04:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your edits. DÅRTHBØTTØ _(T•C) 08:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for disruptive editing. Multiple warnings either ignored or engaged disruptively. Likely competence issues. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 09:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sudipto Surjo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Renaissance (Bangladeshi band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Sudipto Surjo's block expires and they immediate resume their disruptive conduct. Thank you. DÅRTHBØTTØ _(T•C) 01:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Harry Callahan (Disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 24#Harry Callahan (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:27, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit adding ;File:Keaton as Batman.jpg to the article. non-free content must meet all the npon-free content criteria. For this image, there is no non-free usage rationale for using it in the Bruce Wayne (1989 film series character) article. See WP:NFCC#10c. -- Whpq (talk) 11:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Now there is.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. You've had several blocks now for disruptive editing, refusal to collaborate, making unilateral page moves and template disruption. Your block just expired and you went straight back into it. Since you have no willingness to communicate, refuse to listen, and are just continuing your disruptive pattern of editing with an WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT attitude, I have no choice but to block you. You're clearly not here to be a part of a collaborative project. Canterbury Tail talk 12:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sudipto Surjo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prince Mahmud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sudipto Surjo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prince Mahmud".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:14, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sudipto Surjo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Renaissance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sudipto Surjo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Professor Subarna Sen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Souls (band) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 16:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ali Mills 1984.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Pilu Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Md Joni Hossain (talk) 10:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]