User talk:Sxologist

Archives

Archive 1

Just wanted to drop by and say I appreciate your work undoing the contributions made by Skoojal/Freeknowledgecreator. His articles were clearly violating WP:Fringe and trying to make conversion therapy look like a scientifically valid practice, with the only reviews in the "Reception" sections being positive or neutral ones. I'm glad someone who's better at editing Wikipedia articles than I am is fixing these biased articles! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dustytumble (talk • contribs) 18:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dustytumble: thank you, much appreciated. I wish I had more time to edit on Wikipedia, but even small adjustments can improve articles. Sxologist (talk) 21:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Psychology Barnstar
		For your excellent work improving psychology-related articles, particularly in correcting erroneous or misleading information regarding conversion therapy. Great job! Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/his/him] 19:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mark! Sxologist (talk) 22:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivanka Savic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have requested a formal closure for the RfC that resulted from the WP:RSN discussion you created on 9 August 2020 . Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 12:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenomonoz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

gnu57 07:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are allowed to keep editing, I'm willing to start over. And, after all, our interactions haven't been too bad. Just a little heated a couple of times. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, three times when including the SPI. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flyer, of course. I don’t expect I will be able to keep editing and I accept that if that’s the decision. Thanks for leaving a comment. Sxologist (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are indefinitely blocked, there is the WP:Standard offer, like Beyond My Ken mentioned. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, that sounds okay. Sxologist (talk) 20:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Blank Slate, second edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Flyer22 Frozen: I'm not sure if you are the correct person to ask – but am I allowed to contribute to Simple Wikipedia during my block? I saw that on WP:OFFER, users are encouraged to contribute to other WMF projects if they are interested in appealing a block, so I have done some contributions on Wikiquote. Not sure if simple wiki qualifies as english wikipedia though. Thanks. Sxologist (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that your block here applies there. There is a sock I dealt with that edited other Wikipedias while blocked here, and the Simple English Wikipedia knew he was blocked here. He was eventually blocked there and at one or more other Wikipedias as well. Anyway, you aren't globally blocked. But I will make a post at WP:AN about this for additional commentary. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simple English Wikipedia is not a "subsidiary" of English Wikipedia, it is a separate project, like any of the other-language Wikipedias. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may edit any other project, but some of them (like the Simple English Wikipedia) have precautions in place (see simple:Wikipedia:Blocks_and_bans#Reciprocal) that require you to adhere to their rules closely or be blocked there too. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you everyone. Sxologist (talk) 02:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also keep in mind that the Simple English Wikipedia is serious about keeping it simple. They are even less supportive of all that technical language than Wikipedia is on the matter. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 04:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:As Nature Made Him.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sxologist. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Qazi Rahman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sxologist. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charles Roselli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sxologist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Qazi Rahman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You emailed asking me to get back to you. How can I help you? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I will need to wait on this until I have appealed my current block for not disclosing a previous account. I still intend to help contribute to Wiki. Thanks Sxologist (talk) 21:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]