User talk:WikiNutt

Hello, I'm RolandR. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Vladimir Lenin that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Vladimir Lenin. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have continuously attempted to harass me, i'd like to remind you that this behavior is not allowed on this platform https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment. I am advising you to discontinue such behavior or moderation will enact disciplinary actions.

WikiNutt (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RolandR (talk) 00:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have never personally attacked anybody, I don't know why you are continuing to harass me after my initial warning for you to stop. You have continuously harassed me over an edit that you had a problem with, due to your political leanings. WikiNutt (talk) 01:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WikiNutt's harassment of RolandR. GMG^talk 12:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As an univolved Admin, I was wondering if you could provide dif's (Wikipedia:Diff link) of this "harassment" at the above referenced discussion. The thread can be found at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. Thanks, --Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dlohcierekim, I'm somewhat flabbergasted as to why the user (RolandR) and his possible acquaintance (Midnightblueowl) are continuing to escalate something that they themselves have created. I will give my story of this. I made a revision on Vladimir Putin's ethnic background (as there is considerable evidence toward his father's ethnic origin, which is cited by sources which I find to be reputable on the page of his father, Ilya Ulyanov) located here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vladimir_Lenin&diff=829879147&oldid=829748336

It was immediately revised by RolandR, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vladimir_Lenin&diff=829884211&oldid=829879147 , and I created a new section on the Talk Page of Vladimir Putin giving my opinion as to why my revision should be accepted. Upon taking a look at this user's profile page, it was clear as day to me that this individual is political biased and is proud of this. If we examine his profile page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RolandR), we can see that he wears it as a badge of honor and has even been criticized by many users for this bias, such as the page created here by Gilad Atzmon (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-united-against-knowledge.html). I again revised the page, and said that I will accept my revision being reverted if another (non-biased) user were to do so.

That is when Mightnightblueowl stepped in, by claiming I am personally attacking the user RolandR. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vladimir_Lenin&diff=829908080&oldid=829895057 . It was also reiterated here, with threats from Midnightblueowl of disciplinary actions for "personally attacking RolandR," https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vladimir_Lenin&diff=829908540&oldid=829895012

I asked if they were acquaintances with one another, because I was surprised that they are claiming I am personally attacking him. I am also surprised as to how an individual with this amount of political bias can be making such decisions on an article where one must be completely neutral: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vladimir_Lenin&diff=830128653&oldid=829966869

RolandR then has chimed in, by claiming I am personally attacking him and that I will face disciplinary action (on the Talk page of Vladimir Lenin and the Talk page of my account (Wikinutt)). I returned by stating that I have asked for him to stop harassing me since (all above), and that wikipedia can take disciplinary actions against him as well if he were to continue. He again immediately responded by claiming I am personally attacking him, threats of disciplinary actions as usual, etc - I've just been ignoring him now. It's somewhat obvious that those two users could be acquaintances with one another, and that they want me off this platform because I have differing political leanings. WikiNutt (talk) 03:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. If you've not done so already, you should post all this at the an/i thread.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep saying "Vladimir Putin" when the discussion is about Lenin? Please collect your thoughts before hitting the blue button. You are personally attacking RolandR by asserting (without evidence) that his edits to the Lenin article are motivated by anti-Semitism. That is a very serious charge that requires very persuasive evidence which you have utterly failed to provide. Why would someone with RolandR's politics automatically want to interfere with an accurate description of Lenin's ethnic ancestry? That makes no sense. It is incumbent on you to gain consensus for any changes you want to make to the Lenin article. You cannot use the Wikipedia article about Lenin's father to bolster your argument, although some of that article's references may (or may not) be useful. Any notion that you can determine someone's ethnic background by looking at a cross in a photo is absurd on the face of it. If reliable sources differ on Lenin's ethnic ancestry, then Wikipedia will describe the matter as unresolved. Period. So, I recommend that you back off and apologize to RolandR, because your behavior in this matter has been very poor. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen328 is personally attacking me. WikiNutt (talk) 09:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Sorry, no. Calling you out for errors and incivility and calling on you to follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are not Cullen personally attacking you. Calling on you to apologise when in error is not Cullen personally attacking you. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All you were asked to do was provide a reliable source for Lenin's ancestry, over which there seems to be some uncertainty. You cannot infer antisemitism from the doubts someone may have as to whether you have managed to do that. As for "Any notion that you can determine someone's ethnic background by looking at a cross in a photo is absurd on the face of it." this is particularly true when, as you have just admitted at ANI, your photographic interpetation skills do not allow you to discriminate one Vladimir from another. Britmax (talk) 12:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You left a comment on my page regarding my edits. I stated they were removed because none of the sources backed up the claims that were made. You ought to read the sources before thinking they're worthy. Furthermore, 'Palestine' and 'Mandatory Palestine' are used interchangeably - so I was correct in my edit, as Israel did not exist during Margot Frank's life.

Robert Hossein's ethnic information has been distorted by people on Wikipedia, with sources that don't even back up the claims made, including deliberate attempts to hide he has roots in Persian Samarkand, not in Azerbaijan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashbourne1 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have any evidence of such a thing being distorted. If you have credible information that he has roots in "Persian Samarkand," then discuss it in the talk page and introduce sources for your disputes. You instead are deleting credible information, like on the page of the Iranian Schindler which is not right! WikiNutt (talk) 17:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Babak Khorramdin. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Wario-Man (talk) 09:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Political and ethnic biases which exist between various ethnic groups throughout the world should be taken into full consideration regarding matters that involve another ethnic or political group that your peoples view to be as "foes". This is one of the short sighted view points that Wikipedia fails to address, and is why Wikipedia is not considered to be a valid resource among academicians. It's much simpler brushing this subject under the bed of accusations and personal attacks as a way if dismissing this myopic mentality.

Wikipedia should be enforcing politically neutral viewpoints that are not biased toward the view point of one ethnic or political faction! ----- Nutt

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Babak Khorramdin; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wario-Man (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you're personally attacking me. Do you know that?

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Aq Qoyunlu, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Say it, don't spray it. WikiNutt (talk) 12:51, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WikiNutt! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I Feel Tired (talk) 20:43, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 01:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA[edit]

You need to calm down and stop edit-warring / making personal attacks. I see you've been warned about personal attacks already, so you aren't helping yourself with continued remarks like this. Kindly consider stopping edit-wars with WP:OR edit descriptions, and reach consensus on article's talk page. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 01:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is targeted harassment at its finest. WikiNutt (talk) 03:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Azerbaijanis. - LouisAragon (talk) 06:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this big boy. Let me recommend a couple good reads for you:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harassment

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullying

It's what you're attempting to do right here and right now. WikiNutt (talk) 06:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- LouisAragon (talk) 19:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for personal attacks or violations of the harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  El_C 15:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beta move. WikiNutt (talk) 16:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A body like Alba. El_C 17:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following topic ban now applies to you:

Editing or discussing anything to do with the WP:AA2 or WP:KURDS topic areas, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned per an April 6 report on my talk page (diff). In light of your responses thus far to your own policy violations, I have very little confidence that you are willing or able to edit these topic areas without disruption, attacks and general WP:BATTLEGROUND. In fact, I have very little confidence you'd even be willing to adhere to this sanction, but I'm sort of obliged to at least give you a chance to do so, as unlikely as it may seem.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision and Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 17:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

>You have been sanctioned per an April 6 report on my talk page (diff). In light of your responses thus far to your own policy violations, I have very little confidence that you are willing or able to edit these topic areas without disruption, attacks and general WP:BATTLEGROUND. In fact, I have very little confidence you'd even be willing to adhere to this sanction, but I'm sort of obliged to at least give you a chance to do so, as unlikely as it may seem.

Probably some of the lamest shit you could do, your predispositions about me and my personal character also leave a really bad taste. Does playing Wikipedia God give you the right to judge a person's character, ability and personality? I made some solid points and even opened a response in the Talk Page about it. Go ahead and censor me though big boy, if it makes you feel any bigger and stronger *on Wikipedia* (of all places, lmao). Slander my character with your bullshit assumptions about me being "unwilling" in general. I gave up with that thread anyways since you guys seemed determined in wanting to peddle a horseshit source from a literal nobody who admits in their study that they pulled these figures purely from speculation (slang term for thin air). I'm not even going to mention their background or their own ethnic nationalist bias, which I think plays a strong role in the subject matter. WikiNutt (talk) 04:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You made a single rant in the talk page only after edit-warring and removing long-standing stable content. And only after my complaint on you, probably hounding me like you did here. That's noway near how you should conduct yourself on Wikipedia, especially in AA area. Seems like you don't plan to stop the personal attacks either. I'm only doing this out of good faith, but you're clearly WP:NOTHERE. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 11:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Super-(Redacted). WikiNutt (talk) 08:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for racist rants. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  El_C 13:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]