User talk:Goldsztajn
From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gamergate (harassment campaign) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 February 2023[edit]
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
Throw the damn ball...[edit]
Hi Goldsztajn, I remember you once mentioning something similar to me, or perhaps it was Toddy1, "Throw the damn ball and leave it". I'm trying to locate a page for it but I have miserably failed. Could you guys please help me locate it? Best, ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 05:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @AafiOnMobile @TheAafi: I don't think it was me, but I think you mean Wikipedia:Catch Once and Leave? Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 05:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes definitely. That's what I was looking for. Thanks. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 05:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @AafiOnMobile Welcome! Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 05:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Goldsztajn: I'm thankful to you as ever. As a representative of a thematic affiliate of Wikimedia, focused to betterment, improvement and creation of quality-content related to Muslim academia and scholarship. The affiliate has set a target of 500 articles for February-July 2023 alongside completing a strategic research study. Given your vast experience, the researchers of this project might seek ideas from experienced Wikimedians as well and try to know "how and what makes a better encyclopedia" and how this subjective gap could be reduced. Since you often participate in WikiProject Islam related articles, I hope you can propose some articles to be worked upon and made better. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @TheAafi - Thank you for the invitation, unfortunately, I've not had much time these last couple of weeks, but I have this on my radar and I hope to be able to support during April. Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Goldsztajn. This is enough for me that you are willing to help. I hope that we are successful in defining the strategic methods, we could perhaps study and analyze methods adopted by WikiWomenInRed and other such initiatives and find out what works best in bringing "quality based knowledge" and "quality-based-long-time participation" in the themes that concern the DCW. I have plans to join this year's Wikimedia Summit which generally takes place in Berlin. Attending the event could also be helpful in forming some crosswiki collaborative projects. ─ The Aafī (talk) 04:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @TheAafi - Thank you for the invitation, unfortunately, I've not had much time these last couple of weeks, but I have this on my radar and I hope to be able to support during April. Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Goldsztajn: I'm thankful to you as ever. As a representative of a thematic affiliate of Wikimedia, focused to betterment, improvement and creation of quality-content related to Muslim academia and scholarship. The affiliate has set a target of 500 articles for February-July 2023 alongside completing a strategic research study. Given your vast experience, the researchers of this project might seek ideas from experienced Wikimedians as well and try to know "how and what makes a better encyclopedia" and how this subjective gap could be reduced. Since you often participate in WikiProject Islam related articles, I hope you can propose some articles to be worked upon and made better. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- @AafiOnMobile Welcome! Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 05:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes definitely. That's what I was looking for. Thanks. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 05:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2023[edit]
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
Question from Sidney Duane Orr (23:26, 26 February 2023)[edit]
Some recent changes, especially this mentor-arrangement, are a huge improvement! I predict that I will have some questions in future. For the record though, I was very disappointed that I wasn't allowed to vote there. Especially as a long-term user, and financial contributor - albeit in a small way. ttfn Sidney --Sidney Orr (talk) 23:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Sidney Duane Orr - nice to hear from you. Good to meet a fellow Bruin, although I am of somewhat younger (relatively) vintage. I spent a part of my life in the Southland, a place I enjoyed a great deal. I suspect the reason you could not vote was your edit count being too low. Feel free to ask any questions, happy to help any way I can. Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your replay, Landsman. For many years I ignored the opinions of subject-matter-experts (SME) on the Wiki's contents, and, also, somewhat lazily, the topics on which I was a SME, and, also politics. However, I just saw the "Israel" page, and was appalled at its bias and spin. This is poison to the intellect. There is little else I want to say or do here, and especially so, after contributing editorially and financially for many years, and being somewhat chastised for that. Moreover, I can now say that my vague perceptions of the wiki have crystallized: the pages are a prime example of mere fervor, naivete, and inexperience triumphing over knowledge, experience, and skill, etc..... However, I wish you well in your involvement hereabouts, and, that you contribute to truth-telling, in the best traditions of scholarship. Sidney Orr (talk) 17:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Free Democratic Party (Germany) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 March 2023[edit]
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Signpost: 20 March 2023[edit]
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
Question from Basil Kondwani Ngambi (16:12, 26 March 2023)[edit]
what do i gain after i get to edit a task? --Basil Kondwani Ngambi (talk) 16:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Basil Kondwani Ngambi. I'm not sure I understand your question properly, but we do not gain things, we are all volunteers. Or are you asking about something else? Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 18:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- yes i did not mean things like material things ni, i mean do i get to be rated for my editing or maybe recognised in some way has an editor? Basil Kondwani Ngambi (talk) 19:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Basil Kondwani Ngambi. In general, there is no rating for editors themselves, whereas articles are rated, with many editors finding satisfaction from working on articles to achieve good or featured status. Nevertheless, there is a wide variety of barnstars which are lsimilar to awards that editors give to each other in recognition of work, good deeds or for any reason one thinks. I hope this helps, and happy to answer any questions you may have. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- alright sure so whats my first article Basil Kondwani Ngambi (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Basil Kondwani Ngambi Probably the best way to start is to get yourself familiar with editing. Have a read of: H:EDIT, find an article of a subject that interests you and try to improve it (eg add some reliable sources or copy-edit). For information on starting an article have a read of Help:Your first article. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 12:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- alright sure so whats my first article Basil Kondwani Ngambi (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Basil Kondwani Ngambi. In general, there is no rating for editors themselves, whereas articles are rated, with many editors finding satisfaction from working on articles to achieve good or featured status. Nevertheless, there is a wide variety of barnstars which are lsimilar to awards that editors give to each other in recognition of work, good deeds or for any reason one thinks. I hope this helps, and happy to answer any questions you may have. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- yes i did not mean things like material things ni, i mean do i get to be rated for my editing or maybe recognised in some way has an editor? Basil Kondwani Ngambi (talk) 19:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)