User talk:Orestek
From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
|
St. Mary of the Angels in Chicago[edit]
Very good work at this article. Keep it up! Arturo Cruz 04:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Tolerance Monument[edit]
With the reference from the Jerusalem Post that you added, I would say that notability is now asserted. That was the only roadblock, in my opinion. I put the reference into proper Wikipedia form (which is a bit tricky, so don't feel bad if you're not up on the technique — I have to check a "cheat sheet" myself, and I've done this a number of times), and I removed the warning tags. You're good to go. Realkyhick 17:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome v.2[edit]
Hello, Orestek. I wanted to extend a personal welcome and let you know about potentially helpful resources.
If you are interested in Ukraine-related themes, you may want to check out the Ukraine Portal, particularly the Portal:Ukraine/New article announcements and Portal:Ukraine/Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board. The New article announcements board is probably the most important and the most attended one. Please don't forget to announce there the new articles you create. Adding both boards to your watchlist is probably a good idea.
Finally, in case you are interested, similar boards exist at Russia portal as many editors contribute to topics related to both countries. The respective boards there are: Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. Of course there are also many other portals at Wikipedia or you may just get right into editing.
Again, welcome!--Riurik (discuss) 15:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on List of American artists, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how List of American artists is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:List of American artists saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions.
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American artists. There is currently a discussion taking place on the article talk page with a view to recreating this list in a more viable format. It should not be recreated until consensus on this has been reached. I am also not happy about the large number of red links you placed on the list, as this is meant for notable artists, who would normally have their own article. Red links are likely to be removed if there is no evidence presented of notability. Tyrenius 01:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
|
.svg)
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 18:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Monument[edit]
Hello! I wantedd to tell you that I am adding the link to Tolerance Monument to List of places in Jerusalem instead of Jerusalem, since I think that is a more appropriate place for it. I also was interested in reading your Polish church article. As I passed by on the way to O'Hare, I would always pass by and wonder about those grandiose buildings. Best, nadav 23:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Great article to add, thanks. KP Botany 19:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Dobre rady[edit]
Use categories and list your articles here to bring them to a wider audience.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 21:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent idea, Piotr. I'm just fascinated by this article and these churches. There must be plenty folks reading Did You Know would like to know about. KP Botany 21:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
St. Stanislaus Kostka Church (Pittsburgh)[edit]
 | On 30 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article St. Stanislaus Kostka Church (Pittsburgh), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--howcheng {chat} 06:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Synagogues in Israel[edit]
While not an expert on the matter, I am sure a large number of synagogues in Israel (mostly older ones I suspect) are built in styles from the diaspora. However, synagogues in Europe were usually not built to be as large or imposing as the churches. For more information, I would ask someone more knowledgable about such things. Maybe Chesdovi or someone else at Wikipedia:WikiProject Judaism. nadav 16:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the wikiproject - here's the bulletin - if you don't like it just delete it from your talk page, otherwise, it automatically updates. Please give me or one of the other project members a shout if you need any help. Kind regards --Mcginnly | Natter 19:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Avondale, Chicago[edit]
I was thinking about music samples, not pronunciation. Believe me, my voice is not intented to such samples :) However, I have requested Halibutt to do so. Thanks and best regards. —Visor (talk · contribs) 08:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Joseph Molitor (architect)[edit]
I was wondering what your plans are for this article. At present it needs reliable sources to show some level of notability. Without it, it could face deletion. I did not mark it for deletion but someone else may. JodyB talk 00:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
DYK[edit]
| | On 31 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Supraśl Lavra, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--ALoan (Talk) 10:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Grado[edit]
Great stuff. you should think about giving tours!
Suprasl[edit]
Suprasl was not recognized as a lavra in the Russian Empire. Numerous Orthodox monasteries claim to have been called lavras from times immemorial, but that doesn't make the title official. We should always take ecclesiastical legends with a grain of salt. --Ghirla-трёп- 18:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Cleveland's ecclesiastical architecture[edit]
Thanks for that contribution. EurekaLott has unilaterally struck a lot of material out of that article that they felt didn't belong. It's too bad they don't rely on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines as much as they do on their preferences. Makes it hard for people making good faith and properly supported edits. MARussellPESE 02:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. I'm more familiar with the Wilmette House of Worship than most. I lived within ten miles of it for fifteen years, and spent a year-long internship there while in college. Have you visited?
- One thing I think is very interesting is that the interior and exterior concrete work is of decidedly distinct styles in detail, with the exterior Sullivanesque and the interior more Deco, yet they blend quite naturally. Louis Bourgeois is credited with the building, but he didn't finish plans for the interior prior to his demise. The interior was designed in the late '40s by Alfred Shaw of Shaw, Metz & Dolio. The successful blending of these styles is a credit to Shaw, and something I should add to those articles.
- Cheers, MARussellPESE 00:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
William J. Brinkmann[edit]
Thanks for this article. Looks like you contribute quite a few! Could you provide the reference for your information? I found little on Google, probably because this is not too recent. thanks! —Gaff ταλκ 07:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 | The Original Barnstar | |
| For your finely written, referenced contributions. —Gaff ταλκ 08:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
Belz, Coat of Arms[edit]
In my opinion, two images of Belz Coat of Arms (1508 and 1772) ought to be presented in the article (like in Polish version). I am trying to add an image of Belz Coat of Arms, 1508 but unfortunately without success. Would you be so kind to do it ? All the best, Mibelz 17:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
WP:WPChi ratings[edit]
(also posted on WP:WPChi talk page) I would be cautious with just changing importance ratings merely because of AIA inclusion. By default an individual building listed on the National Register of Historic Places gets a "mid" and those not but listed as Chicago Landmarks by the city are listed as low. Chicago architecture represents the cumulative importance of all the individual buildings, archictects, styles, techniques, etc. Many individual buildings may be high for international cultural reasons. However, don't go down a road similar to the WP:ILIKEIT used in deletion discussions for changing our ratings. Review our assessment scale for more info as suggested above. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 18:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
St. John Cantius in Chicago[edit]
Thanks for contributions to St. John Cantius in Chicago. Also, thanks for calling our attention to this ratings oversight. During ratings often cursory glances at pages are used to determine a rating that follows an article around. Unfortunately, due to the limited volunteer manpower available in comparison to the volumes of work to be done this is necessary. If you have any further rating problems, call our attention to them at WP:CHIASSESS. I have set up a new section for importance assessments and reassessments. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes. Thanks a lot indeed! Anchorite 16:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Ratings[edit]
Can you send me to the proper links for St. Mary of the Angels & St. Stanislaus Kostka. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Neighborhood/Community area[edit]
Generally, a Landmark District should have its own page if at all possible. Many people feel very strongly about neighborhoods having separate articles from the official Community areas of Chicago. In general we have been at a pretty good equilibrium with respect to this issue. What neighborhoods did you redirect?
Sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago#Members.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Six corners[edit]
I am going to put the six corners on the WP:WPChi discussion notice section. Let's see if anyone has an opinion about the merger. Gladstone was a good merger, IMO. Six corners may have enough meat to stand on its own.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Taste of Polonia[edit]
I saw your new Taste of Polonia article. Do you think you could convert it to inline citations where a footnote immediately follows the claim needing to be cited? Many of the other pages in the newly created section of WP:CHICAGO use this format and the WP:CHICOTW uses inline citations. It would be helpful if you do this on this article and for future articles.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Gateway Theatre (Chicago)[edit]
Gateway Theatre (Chicago) has the same problem as the above article. The problem with an article with a bunch of interesting facts that are not cited inline is when the WP:NPP guys come by and look at your page they may see it has a lot of interesting claims that they can't find very easily. If the line was too long at Starbucks that day, they might WP:AFD your page because they don't know how to find all your claims. If they are interested in putting you to work they might tag it with all kinds of things that make your article look bad like {{unreferenced}}, {{Citations missing}}, {{cleanup}} or {{wikify}}. Whether or not they put these tags on the article they might put it on a watchlist to be AFDed in 6 months or a year as unsourced blatherings. I strongly encourage you to cite the articles inline while you remember where all the interesting facts came from.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Old Irving Park[edit]
May I ask why you moved Old Irving Park, Chicago to Irving Park, Chicago? I live in the neighborhood and we always call it Old Irving Park. --Ephilei 03:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Overuse of See Also[edit]
Hi Orestek, not to be nit-picky, but instead of using See Also sections to connect your articles, please consider just mentioning them inline, or creating (or using existing) categories, infoboxes and templates. Ask TonyTheTiger for advice in this regard. Speciate 05:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Pic on Polish Wikipedia[edit]
My understanding of pics is limited; Kranar drogin or IvoShandor are the go-to guys on that. Speciate 05:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Katedra PNKK w Chicago[edit]
- Zdjęcie Katedry Wszystkich Świętych Polskiego Narodowego Kościoła Katolickiego w Chicago została wgrana na Wikipedia Commons.
Image:Former All Saints Cathedral, Chicago.jpg. Pozdrawiam.
Michcik 15:32, 3 September 2007 (Warszawa) Poland
- Ciesze się, że podjęłeś próbę stworzenia angielskiego hasła o katedrze PNKK w Chicago. Hasła związane z Polskim Narodowym Kościołem Katolickim (PNCC) są mi niezwykle bliskie, bowiem jako członek Kościoła Polskokatolickiego (Polish Catholic Church), jestem też członkiem PNCC. Narazie jednak opisuje głównie parafie i katedry Kościoła Polskokatolickiego. Wyrażenie "Cement Stone", można przetłumaczyć jako "cegła".
Michcik 19:08, 7 September 2007 (Warszawa) Poland
- Opisywanie kościołów PNKK (Polski Narodowy Kościół Katolicki (PNCC)) jest dla mnie troche niełatwe, ponieważ nie znam, aż tak dobrze języka angielskiego. Ciesze się natomiast, że ty interesujesz się Kościołami PNKK (PNCC). Spróbuje skontaktować się z ks. bp dr Janem Dawidziukiem, ale nie wiem czy zna on na tyle dobrze j.polski. Wierni Kościoła Polskokatolickiego (jak pisałem Kościół Polskokatolicki (PCC)) jest w unii z PNCC) z obawą obserwują zanik polskich tradycji, obrzędów i języka w działalności parafii PNCC. Jest nam przykro, że narodowi katolicy ze Stanów Zjednoczonych i Kamady rezygnują z liturgii w j.polskim, oraz że oba kościoły nie współpracują ściśle ze sobą. A ty Orestek jesteś członkiem Polskiego Narodowego Kościoła Katolickiego, jeżeli tak to z jakiej parafii i czy w waszym kościele są kultywowane jakieś polskie tradycje, obrzędowe lub językowe?
A to moja parafia: Katedra PCC św. Ducha w Warszawie
Michcik 21:39, 8 September 2007 (Warszawa) Poland
- Bardzo się ciesze i dziękuje za zainteresowanie Polskim Narodowym Kościołem Katolickim. Szkoda, ze juz tak mało polaków w Stanach Zjednoczonych wie o istnieniu PNCC. Jeszcze raz dziękuje za przekład artykułu o kotadrze PNCC w Chicago. Spróbuje więc nawiązać z bp Dawidziukiem korespondencje w j.polskim - może uda mi się uzyskać od niego jakieś ciekawe informacje lub fotografie.
Michcik 19:14, 17 September 2007 (Warszawa) Poland
Holy Trinity Church[edit]
Odczytałem Twój wpis na mojej stronie w pl-wiki na temat Kościoła św. Trójcy. Masz absolutnie rację, że trzeba to hasło po polsku rozbudować i chyba mogę to zrobić, ale za chwilę, bo pracuję teraz nad innym projektem. Rozumiem, że Twój polski to jest Twój Second Language, ale radzisz sobie znakomicie, brawo! Ja dość rzadko zjawiam się na swojej stronie w en-wiki, dlatego raczej proszę o kontakt na mailu: belissarius26@gmail.com. You may use both Polish and English language, I shall respond. Pozdrawiam belissarius 03:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
...redirected to Polish Cathedral Style. Przeczytałem - bardzo dobry artykuł, gratuluję! W wolnej chwili (bo teraz pracuję nad hasłem Austro-Węgierska Marynarka Wojenna, przede wszystkim w oparciu o artykuły w en-wiki i de-wiki) jeśli pozwolisz zajmę się tłumaczeniem "Polskiego stylu katedralnego" na język polski. And one more thing - Orestek, please, do not call me "Panie Belissarius"! W wikipedii nie ma "panów". Ty jesteś Orestek, ja Belissarius i to wystarczy. Nobody's age counts, OK? Pozdrawiam serdecznie belissarius 19:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Merge templates[edit]
The date syntax is: {{Merge|other arguments|date=August 2007}}, but if you leave the date off it will be added by a WP:BOT. Rich Farmbrough, 10:57 18 September 2007 (GMT).
Polonia[edit]
I wonder if the average English speaker knows what Polonia means. There was a category, "Chicagoans", that was replaced with "People from Chicago" because (it was argued that) people from outside Chicago wouldn't know that it wasn't Chicagoers, Chicagoites or Chicagoians or whatever. As an example, what are people from Seattle called?
Anyway, since nearly all the other members of the Category:Diasporas have the word "diaspora" in them, and no others use their native language's word for it, "Polonia" stands alone. Is diaspora a distastful word for Poles? If not, what objections do you foresee with renaming the category "Polish diaspora"? Thanks, Speciate 02:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Polonia would be fine as the title of the article on the Polish community outside of eatern Europe, but as a category I am sure "Polish diaspora" would be better received. Anyway, there's no rush to change anything, maybe I'll look around at other ethnic groups' talk pages for inspiration. Speciate 18:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Flags you have seen[edit]
It’s good for me that you’ve visited both the Czech republic and PR, because this allows me to easily compare their flags. Many similarities, but also many differences
Along these lines it is also good for me that you have visited both Poland and Monaco. (though naturally, I thought at first that one of these flags was Indonesia’s flag) (I often forget which of these flags have red on top, and which have white on top.). Since you’ve already visited the Ukraine, you only need to go to Sweden to accomplish a rare flag hat trick. (I class these two together because their flags share the same colors. If they play a televised soccer match against each other, videotape it for me). Or since you’ve already visited Lithuania, you could accomplish this feat by visiting any number of nations with red, green, and yellow flags. I have studied flags, because I think they are symbols that tell us something about people who use them.
You’ve been around, haven’t you?
George Pelly-Bosela
gpelly.bosela@gmail.com GPelly-Bosela 04:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC) (U.K., Ireland, Iberian Peninsula, far West Africa, and nearby island, time)
What are all those names, such as Trojcowo, Stanislawowo, etc? Speciate 07:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Not to be a killjoy, but since this is the English Wikipedia, I suggest using the English names. Even better than those lists would be a nice map. Speciate 08:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, perhaps one of those nifty sortable lists like in List of tallest buildings in Chicago? I mention these things because I don't what some random person tagging your article for Original Research. Speciate 08:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit on Mayfair (Metra) station. It would certainly best for somebody who's actually from the Chicago Metropolitan Area to work on articles relating to these stations, but I still found a great deal of them to be fascinating. Just out of curiosity, can you get an image of the station to submit to that article? I notice that Metra doesn't have one for their official website. ----DanTD (talk) 02:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Parks[edit]
Good work with the addition of the Parks subsection to the city article. I noticed that you have made a link to the Chicago Parks District. I fixed the link, but the article is kind of a mess. Would you be interested in overhauling it? Ryecatcher773 (talk) 05:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Milwaukee Avenue[edit]
Nasze zasoby zdjęciowe z dawnych lat są ubogie. Z podobnym pytaniem przyszła do nas dziewczyna, która robi dyplom z tematu "Dziennik Związkowy" i też szuka zdjęć. Ona nie miała wysokich wymagań, więc posłużyła się reprodukcjami z gazety; tu jednak będzie trudniej. Niemniej zapraszam do naszej redakcji, może wspólnie coś wymyślimy. Namiary są takie:
- adres 5711 N Milwaukee (między Brynmawr i Austin),
- telefon do mnie (773) 763-3343 #242,
- najlepszy termin to każdy piątek godz. 12 w południe.
Z wypadku wyszedłem, wszystko dobrze, dziękuję, pozdrawiam i do zobaczenia. Piotr Domaradzki belissarius (talk) 00:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Ludźmierz[edit]
Cześć, ucieszyłam się, że zechciałeś zamieścić moje zdjęcia w artykule, a przede wszystkim tym, że na en taki artykuł powstał :-) Niestety, posiadam bardzo marne umiejętności techniczne i nie umiem przenieść zdjęć na Commons. Wpisałam się do dyskusji w Ludźmierzu, ale bez skutku. A Ty nie mógłbyś mi pomóc? pozdrawiam serdecznie, Jadwiga —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.78.236.225 (talk) 12:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Dzięki za instrukcję. W czwartek (wieczorem) postaram się, aby zdjęcia były. Dam Ci znać jak się uda (jak nie, to też :-) pozdr. Jadwiga —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.78.236.225 (talk) 22:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Witam, zdjęcia są na Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lud%C5%BAmierz. serdecznie pozdrawiam, Jadwiga —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.78.236.225 (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Our Lady of Manaoag[edit]
Thanks for your thoughts on Our Lady. It is not just for culture but she is so powerful and my life had been centered on her. I gave up in commons since the international laws on copyright are so tough. I dream and hope that the article of Our Lady of Manaoag will have a pics. Flickr does have many there and commons allow it[1]. But there are lots of tiger admins there. And Flick uploading is not that simple, it has long FAQs. So, I suggest, that you get another if not from Flickr, and go thru a kind administrator here, not in commons. The Coffee, our Filipino admin is kind one, and others too. So, please go ahead, be the one to upload it with my suggestion. There is nothing wrong if they delete it. Regards. - --Florentino floro (talk) 07:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, MADE. Please pray that this image from commons I just uploaded,[2] will be there forever. It is for the benefit of all. Our Lady of Manaoag --Florentino floro (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Our_Lady_of_Manaoag.jpg){kind=link}
WikiCookie[edit]
Top Importance Chicago Articles[edit]
If you want to help me choose Category:Top-importance Chicago articles, come comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates by June 5th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:CHICAGO survey[edit]
 | Hi, thank you for being a member of WP:CHICAGO. If you would like to remain as an active member please note so here, otherwise mark yourself inactive or semi-active. Thank you. If active, put "Active in project since MM/YYYY. Active as of MM/YYYY" where MM and YYYY represent approximate time you joined the project. Make sure anyone you think is active in the project has signed up on the project page and the last time you confirmed your activity.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC) |
WP:CHICAGO[edit]
You have been marked as an inactive member of WP:CHICAGO since you have not updated your status at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please correct your status. If you consider yourself a member you may want to get involved in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:CHICAGO leadership[edit]
This month you have indicated new or continuing interest in WP:CHICAGO as either an active or semi-active member. The response to the project membership survey was strong enough that we should attempt to organize it in a more fully functional way. Please sign up at Wikipedia:CHICAGO/leadership if you would be willing to serve as a leader of the project from September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009. The various leadership responsibilities are listed there. The roles will be somewhat similar to the roles of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators. We are a less mature and developed project than WP:MILHIST however, so our division of roles will be slightly different. Please respond by the 23rd.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Re:Lithuanians in Chicago[edit]
Hello. No problem, just doing my job :) M.K. (talk) 10:02, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Nelson Algren[edit]
You asked
- Is this the preferred standard on wikipedia or just a personal stylistic preference [?]
The answer is neither; it's bcz of a problem i've never encountered before, and i'm guessing you missed what i put on the talk page at Talk:Nelson Algren#Quotation problems (8 hours ago; don't be distracted by my less relevant cmts in the subsection, 1 hour ago). If you read it and don't follow me, ask me a question or two.
--Jerzy•t 04:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, i meant to say i will look closer at the specific change you asked about & respond pronto.
--Jerzy•t 04:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC) - OK, lemme see. You ask about my removal of
- His writing's central focus on the area's Polish American underclass against the background of prevalent anti-immigrant xenophobia was taken by Poles as anti-Polonism
- That's part of a sentence with two independent clauses, and i moved the 2nd of those clauses to a later point
; that may have been a mistake, getting confused between the two novels mentioned as controversial.
As to the first clause, i tried to find its basis in the source (in order to reword it) and IIRC came to believe it doesn't map to a single sentence, which is why i moved it since for me fixing was too big a job, and my purpose was to deal with the quotation problems. Were you the editor who contributed it? Can we collaborate on rewording it?
--Jerzy•t 04:44 & 05:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'm about 5-10 minutes from sleeping, but if you don't have another plan, i'd be helped tomorrow if -- assuming you can easily locate the passages, i assume in the cited Chicago Talk page, that you relied on in composing your version of the sentence i gave up on -- & show me. It's pretty long, so it may help a lot to identify each with the number of its bulleted section (counting within the series of them) and the number of its 'graph (counting within the series of them in its bulleted section) -- My thot is that sometimes the context a sentence lies within clarifies or changes its meaning, so it helps to be able to count the way to each.
--Jerzy•t 07:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk-page ToC[edit]
I get no table of contents on this talk page, and unless you intentionally caused that, my guess is that it's a wanted or unwanted side effect of the Welcome in the lead section, and you may be able regain your ToC by either editing in __TOC__ at the start of a line, or removing the welcome, say to a new subpage User talk:Orestek/Welcome. Especially where there are many sections and some accumulate edits after new sections get added, it helps cut down on the scrolling effort for you and others who come here. (I've given myself a 4-year disqualification from criticizing failure to archive old talk -- can you guess why? -- so i'll say no more about reducing the number of sections.) Ask me questions or use Help:help if that doesn't make sense.
--Jerzy•t 08:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Complaint[edit]
What article are you talking about.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I do not watch that article. It is too high volume and would consume most of my productive time. Feel free to improve it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations. Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland has reviewed your contributions and decided you are an active member. Thank you for your encyclopedic contributions! But creating content by yourself is only part of the collaborative Wikipedia user experience, there is an active community of editors discussing how to better improve the Poland-related content; please consider joining our discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland. There are many editors who would like to work more closely with you, benefit from your insight, and help you with their experience! PS. Please also consider editing your entry in our participants list to state your areas of expertise/interest.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics GA[edit]
 | This user helped promote Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics to good article status. |
Thanks for being one of the many people who contributed to this article on its way to WP:GA status.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Chicago subsection on public art and monuments[edit]
Thanks for creating the subsection and the work that went into the initial list. Pknkly (talk) 22:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
confused by addition at Bahá'í_Faith_by_country#Kazakhstan[edit]
While the country does need to be in the list - thanks - the content is considerable. Normally we just include the intro paragraph as it is a summary of the whole article. Smkolins (talk) 18:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for clean up of Architecture of Chicago[edit]
Thanks for setting the columns for the "Styles and schools" section. I would have done it, but didn't know how until I saw how you did it. So, I guess it is also a thanks for the lesson. Pknkly (talk) 01:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Category:Top-importance Chicago articles[edit]
| Hi, thank you for being a member of WP:CHICAGO. If you continue to be actively associated with WP:CHICAGO, please change the date at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members to August 2009, otherwise mark yourself inactive or semi-active. Thank you. Make sure anyone you think is active in the project has signed up on the project page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC) |
For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
WP:CHICAGO voting for Top-importance Chicago articles[edit]
Feel free to come vote at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Tadeusz Żukotyński[edit]
I've done a little bit of work on the Tadeusz Żukotyński article and am trying to get references included -- do you have the sources you used to write this originally? Sweet kate (talk) 19:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)