User talk:Srsval

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classics_for_All Is the page you created. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Srsval/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 13:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

=== Hi The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80, please can you direct me to my submission so that I can see the comments left by the reviewer? I can't find it. Thanks! Srsval (talk) 09:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Srsval. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Srsval/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 18:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Srsval. All or some of your addition(s) to Elaine Fantham has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sally Katary, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read MOS:DOCTOR. Thank you. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 11:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't being reverted arbitrarily. Your work is appreciated but it needs to follow our guidelines as you've been told above. This particular one is at MOS:DOCTOR. Also, after the first use of a full name, we normally use only the surname. Doug Weller talk 12:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Leslie Brubaker, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 21:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GaiaOctaviaAgrippa Thanks for your message. Adding the PhD title is a minor edit as this could not be subject of a dispute. See the reference to the library catalogue page for Johns Hopkins University. Thanks.

Hello, Srsval. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Henriette Harich-Schwarzbauer, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source says she was professor emeritus. By changing this to emerita you are misrepresenting the source. I would also note that the article is in English, not Latin, and emeritus is standard usage in English regardless of the gender of the post holder. DuncanHill (talk) 11:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would add that both the National Archives and the National Portrait Gallery call her Professor Emeritus. DuncanHill (talk) 12:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sally Katary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.sudbury.com/local-news/sally-katary-egyptologist-professor-dedicated-mom-353282. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Srsval! Thanks for adding categories to some articles. However, many of the categories you have added are not needed. For example, if an article has Category:Women classical scholars it only needs to be added to Category:Classical scholars if it does not have Category:"Nationality" classical Scholar (eg Category:British classical scholars). This is because a nationality category is a diffusing sub-category of Category:Classical scholars where as one by gender is non-diffusing. Category:Classical studies does not need to to be added to any article with Category:Classical scholars (or its sub-categories) as it is itself a sub-category of Category:Classical studies. Does this make sense? Please also look at what categories an article already has before adding any more so that you don't end up repeating them as you did at Esther Eidinow. If this isn't clear, feel free to ask questions or check out Wikipedia:Categorization. Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 22:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Srsval, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already written several biographies of women academics. I hope there will be many more. If you run into any problems or need any help, please let me know. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October! New: Clubs Science fiction + fantasy STEM The Mediterranean Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives New: Religion Deceased politicians Asia Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): WikiProject AfroCine launches (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi Srsval. There's no very good reason why you need to go through Articles for Creation in order to create an article, as you did with Marianne Sághy. You could just start it in article space; or start it as a draft and then move it to article space yourself. Obviously a) if it's your preference to go via AfC then that's fine; do so and b) I don't know if there's any restriction preventing new users adding directly to article space: and I doubt you'd be classed as a new user. AfC is rather bunged up, and often-times seems to impose ridiculously high standards on articles before they'll condescend to promote them. In my view, best avoided. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:51, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tagishsimon. Thanks for this. The only reason I used my sandbox to create the article was because I didn't want to create it all at once. When I've created articles directly but not all in one go they've been deleted before I've had chance to finish them! So I was trying to avoid this. Thanks for the advice though! And thanks very much for your own contribution to the article. Great! Tagishsimon Srsval (talk) 09:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox good. AfC, maybe not so good - just my cynical prejudice, of course. I'm hoping you have a 'Move' option under a 'More' top right menu option (just to the left of the search box) ... I'm rather afraid I've lost track of which facilities come by default in wikipedia and which are added via ticking options in Preferences.

My main aim in lurking around #WCCWiki is to try to make sure that WCC contributors don't get hit by wikipedia tomfoolery such as premature deletions, or AfC rejections; so long as you make changes to Wikipedia:Women's Classical Committee or Wikipedia:Women's Classical Committee/Aims, I'll tend to find and if necessary fettle issues with articles. (Other than that, these days, I do most of my work on wikidata.)

Thank you for the barnstar; but thank you much more for the work you & WCC put in to creating articles. It's very much appreciated - the gender gap is rotten, and you guys are very much to be congratulated for addressing it in a practical, competent fashion. Ping me if ever you think I can be of specific help. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Your support is really invaluable. I'm not particularly technically savvy when it comes to Wikipedia editing, and most of the pages I've created or edited for #WCCWiki have been targeted at some point. Have a fantastic day!!! Tagishsimon Srsval (talk) 10:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You too :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:31, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srsval. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Srsval, I'm afraid this nomination does not qualify for DYK: only newly created, newly 5x expanded, or newly listed Good Articles qualify: seven days are allowed from the creation, start of expansion, or listing as a Good Article for a nomination to be made. The Dorothy Garrod article has been around since 2004 and hasn't had a fivefold expansion (or even any recent edits). I am removing the transclusion you just made to the nominations page, as a 2017 date disrupts a number of processes, and will shortly be closing the above nomination as unsuccessful.

Thanks for trying DYK, but please read carefully the information on WP:DYK before making any further nominations, recalling that the activity on any article must be very recent. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Dorothy Garrod at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone. New: Photography Laureates Countries beginning with 'I' Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): BBC 100 Women 2018 (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone. New: Photography Laureates Countries beginning with 'I' Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): BBC 100 Women 2018 (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I've already taken that user to task for exactly that comment - User_talk:ClemRutter#WiR_talk --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support Tagishsimon. Not sure how much more negativity I want to take through this. I could happily be like most other women and not edit Wikipedia!

Mmm. I lived in hope that the comment would have been removed before anyone from #WCCWiki got to the thread. Still: Rosiestep is ace, quite apart from being that rare thing, a decorated Wikipedian. You should meet her ;) --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Srsval and Tagishsimon; thanks for pinging me here. I am supportive of what you wrote on ClemRutter's talkpage, Tagishsimonl; well done. I hope the negativity doesn't abate your enthusiasm to edit Wikipedia, Srsval. There are all the people in the world whom you'll never hear from who read what you write and would be the losers if you left. At least the Pollyanna in me has convinced myself of that. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108 Happy New Year from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons. January events: Women of War and Peace Play! January geofocus: Caucasus New, year-long initiative: Suffrage Continuing global initiative: #1day1woman2019 Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list Image attribution: Nevit Dilmen (CC BY-SA 3.0) --Rosiestep (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111 Happy February from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons. February events: Social Workers Black Women February geofocus: Ancient World Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman2019 Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage: Socialites Twitter - Forgotten African American Suffragists Women in Red image uploads to Commons Image attribution: Johntex (CC BY-SA 3.0) Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe --Rosiestep (talk) 20:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113 Happy Women's History Month from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: March: Art+Feminism & #VisibleWikiWomen Geofocus: Francophone Women Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman
		Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe --Rosiestep (talk) 22:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117 Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)

May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121 Hello and welcome to the May events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: "May" women / Mayors / Environentalists Geofocus: CEE countries Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Ruth Macrides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125 Check out what's happening in June at Women in Red: Virtual events: New topics: Pride / Royals / Space Geofocus: Mediterranean Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Content you included in the above article appears to have been copied from https://apholt.com/2016/07/18/the-state-of-crusade-studies-an-interview-with-dr-helen-j-nicholson/, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you reverted my edit on Emily Gowers. There were some concerns raised that since this article was part of the WCC project to raise the profile of women classicists on Wikipedia, it isn't great that the first section on her article is all about the distinguished men that she's connected to.  J.Gowers  08:47, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi  J.Gowers , yes I did revert the edit because I felt that this was a removal of important information that was in the public interest to keep. However, you make a good point, and usually the foregrounding of women according to men, eminent or otherwise, should be avoided absolutely. How about a compromise? I deleted the 'early life' and instead moved the information lower down the page as 'personal life'. This way the information remains but it isn't the first thing you read about her. Let me know your thoughts. Srsval (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be consistent with most other articles. I will try and add some more information to that section to dilute the men a bit.  J.Gowers  10:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 J.Gowers  Great! Thank you Srsval (talk) 12:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have been one of the editors at wikipedia who has worked most on academic biographies fo the last 12 years, and I was in fact one of the people responsible for the ucrrent acceptance of WP:PROF, without which we would have man fewer. I concentrate my efforts on making the bios for notable people stronger, especially in fields other than thesciences, because thos areheifields where people unfamiliar with the academic world tend to nominate for deletion.

We have a serious problem with promotional bios in all fields, including this. Such bios are usually written by university PR staff, though sometimes by the professor's students. (They are also increasingly written by undeclared paid editors, who solicit faculty who ae unawarethat this sort of editing is not permitted in WP). Really promotional bios are deleted usually by speedy deletion, even when the person is clearly notable, unless I or one oft he other 2 or 3 editors willing to do it think the person so extremely notable that it's worth rewriting. Ordinarily promotional bios for borderline people are usually deleted at AfD if they get noticed.

It's therefore important for all editors working in these field to avoid anything that might sound like promotion.Even when the intend is clearly to write a NPOV bio, as is the case with your work, it's all too easy to sound a little promotional . (Forthe areas you work in, there's still considerable skepticism with classics, because some of the people here who do not understand try to remove them on the basis of the generally low citation count--which is of course totally inapplicable in this field; There also remain a few people who give unwarrented skeptical scrutiny to articles on women, including women academics) . The best way of dealing with this is to make the articles as strong as possible.

Strong does not necessarily mean extensive. it means not using promotional language, not including minor material, and writing concisely without duplication. --- I made my edits because:

1. We do not use adjectives of praise or quality in biographies , especially biographies of living people. They're always subjective, and WP is not the place for opinion. It is usually possible to reword it, as I did, by such wording fixes as changing "best known for" to "is a specialist in" . Is a specialist in is objective--the professorship and the publications shows it.
2. Giving lectures at conferences is utterly routine for both notable and non-notable academics. (I certainly had a non-notable academic career, but I've given a few dozen conference talks--one or two of them have even been invited.) This is the sort of thing people list in their CVs, because it's the current convention to list everything possible in a CV. But WP does not publish CS--for minor we can just link to the CV in the External references. It's much better to focus on those things that make a person notable. This includes prestigeous named lectures, it includes being chair of a very important conference.
3. Similarly for fellowships. Even non-notable people have a few. We do not include graduate and post-graduate fellowships, but we list prestigious ones that people having some knowledge in the field will recognize. And similarly for most items in poplular press, or television talks, or U-Tube. And similarly for TedX. (Ted, however, is worth mentioning).
4. When listing fellowships, or publications , or awards, or anything in any article, it's puffery to use a phrase like "for example" or "including" -- see WP:VAGUE/ Yjos ;eaves the reader wondering how many there really were--and it is often a promotional technique also. It's enough to list the important ones.
5. For people in fields where notability is primarily by published books from university presses, we usually do not include articles--they count as minor. But in classics , and archeology, where readership tends to be limited so it's difficult to get books published, wwe do often incldue articles. And in archeology especially, we similarly do include book chapters

I may revert a few of your changes. (I may also make some changes in earlier articles). You don't have to agree with my style, and I won't fight about it. But I do have the experience to know what works here. DGG ( talk ) 18:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DGG ( talk ) When the notability of women subjects have not been made clear through descriptions of them as 'experts' or 'leaders in their field', these pages have been targeted for deletion as lacking notability. I absolutely agree that articles on women are subjected to overt scrutiny and skepticism, and pages therefore need to be made as strong as possible. In reverting your changes that is what I was trying to do. I apologise if this has offended you. Please do not threaten to revert my changes arbitrarily. Srsval (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editors here did have the practice of insisting on a statement that the person was notable because.... in the lede of the article--back 12 years ago, when I started here. They shouldn't be doing it now, and if anyone says anything of the sort, please let me know on my user talk page, and I will explain the current practice to them. Current practice is the opposite: ones gives in the first sentence or two the key information that establishes notability, and readers judge for themselves what it means. For academics, it means that one give immediate the highest position or title in the first sentence, and if there is a major award, one says it right there, instead of burying it.

"Strong" does not mean expansive. Expansive articles for non-famous people give just the opposite effect to what is desired. Including material that is not really important makes it look like there's nothing important. People here tend to judge articles at the first impression. If it looks like puffery, the frequent current reaction is to immediately try to delete it as promotional . The alternative, of rewriting to remove the puffery, is rarely done--there are two or three people here only who are willing to do that for academics in the humanities, and I'm one of them. I will sometimes do it for other academics if it's easy, and especially if it's women and the notability is clear enough.

I tried to carefully write what I said so it would not sound threatening. Rather, very few articles on academics that I rewrite and defend ever get deleted--maybe 5 out of the 1000 I've rewritten in the last 10 years. I know the style of those who attack articles on academics, and I can usually edit an article so they won't be tempted to even attack it. If I go back to this article, I will restore some but not all of what I did.

Elizabeth A. Clark[edit]

This article is easy, because the notability is so very clear. but again, it's not presented as well as it could be--there is particular is a good deal of duplication, I have removed it. There is however one really serious problem. You licensed the book covers on Commons as your own work. I doubt they are your own work--they are much more likely to be the work of the designers whom the publishers have hired. They therefore do not have a valid free license, and observing copyright is considered so very important here that this matters. . The rules for what has a free license are extremely rigid--if the artists hold the copyright, or if they transferred the copyright to the publishers, you do not own the copyright and you cannot donate it. .So you can't use the images here. The images of a book cover can be in some cases used on enWP as fair use, as one of our few exceptions to a free license, but can be used only for an article on the book , not on the author. Thebest course will be for you to ask they be deleted from Commons, and remove them here. DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128 Check out what's happening in July at Women in Red... Virtual events: New topics: Sports / Education Geofocus: Microstates Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Initiatives we support: Atari Women University of Edinburgh 1000 Women in Religion Editor feedback: Check out the conversations regarding Sports, Sports, Sports! Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131 Check out what's happening in August at Women in Red... Virtual events: New: Film+Stage / Indigenous women / Millennial countries Continuing: Sports (through August 31st) / Suffrage / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: August's Indigenous Women event and the REDress Project Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135 Check out what's happening in September at Women in Red... Online events: New: Law / Military history / Writers / Geofocus: defunct countries Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Missing articles about notable women by "nationality" vs. "country of citizenship" Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140 Check out what's happening in October at Women in Red... Online events: New: STEM / Fashion / Geofocus: landlocked countries / Stub Contest Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Women vice Chancellors in Top 200 universities Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143 Check out what's happening in November at Women in Red... Online events: New: Librarians / Leaders / Geofocus: Asian Women Month Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman / Stub Contest Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Disappearing articles Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147 Check out what's happening in December at Women in Red... Online events: New: Parliamentarians / Classical musicians / 2019 deaths / Geofocus: Arab world Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman / Stub Contest Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Disappearing articles Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Yoho, Thanks for adding in the various WikiProject banners into some #WCC talk pages. I initially spotted an update to one of the articles I was watching which has warranted my message here.

It was on Penelope Mountjoy's page, and I've spotted it on Rose Ferraby's as well - that when you've bulk added in the new Wikiproject data to cover WCC, Classics, and Women's history it has done two things that need flagging: 1) it has duplicated the template for WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome (via "WikiProject Classics" template) in some cases (see here) and that the new additions appear beneath a WikiProject Banner template in the middle of the list. To avoid future confusion for the CGR WikiProject it'll be worth checking these edits to remove the duplicate and the move the banner shell upwards. I've amended Mountjoy's talk page (Talk:Penelope Mountjoy) as well to move the Banner shell higher up in case you wanted to copy the syntax from the edit page.

Thanks, happy thoughts, best wishes etc. Zakhx150 (talk) 13:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zakhx150, thanks for this, and apologies for the duplication/confusion!Srsval (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153 Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020! Online events: New: Activists / Public domain / Geofocus: Central America / Year-long campaign: Sports! Continuing: 2019 deaths / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155 Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red. Online events: New: Explorers / Black Women / Horror / Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Editor feedback: Schedule planning at the Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephanie Jones-Rogers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159 Happy Women's History Month from all of us at Women in Red. Online events: New: Art+Activists & Folklore / Aviation / Great Britain & Ireland Photo and image initiative: #VisibleWikiWomen photo initiative Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Editor feedback: Schedule planning at the Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162 April offerings at Women in Red. Online events: New: Gender studies / Dance / Geofocus: Caucasus Photo and image campaign: #VisibleWikiWomen Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Editor feedback: Schedule planning at the Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Srsval, your DYK nomination does not meet the criteria, and won't be able to run at DYK. There's an explanation at your nomination linked to above, but basically, DYK nominations must be nominated within seven days of the start of your expansion (or the article's creation). In this case, you started the expansion back on February 21, nearly eight weeks ago, and it wasn't expanded fivefold (only threefold); with an April 17 nomination, the expansion had to have been started no later than April 10. I'm sorry it didn't work out this time; best of luck with any future nominations. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166 May offerings at Women in Red. Online events: New: Healthcare / Women and their animals / Marys and Mays/ Geofocus Central & Eastern Europe Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169 Online events: New: Pride / United Nations / Geofocus on reducing gender imbalance Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173 Online events: New: July Julies / Disability / Women from Where? ... and starting for an extended period: BLM/Anti-discrimination Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175 Online events: New: Indigenous women | Countries headed by women Interwiki collaborations: Interwiki Women Collaboration | Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Ending August 31st: Sports (returning for the next Olympics) Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth A. Clark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emerita.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177 Online events: New: Women writers | Women in conflict zones Interwiki collaborations: Women of WWII Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179 Online events: Annual Ada Lovelace Day celebration: Women in STEM Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello Srsval! Thank you for signing up to take part in #MedievalWiki 2020! We've freshly made a project badge, which you are welcome to display on your userpage should you wish. Here's the direct link to our Meetup page for your easy reference. See you on Wednesday! - Medievalfran (talk) 20:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user is a member of WikiProject #MedievalWiki

Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181 Online events: New: Textile arts | Stage+Screen+Radio+Podcast Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183 Online events: New: Women who died in 2020 | Philanthropists Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Other ways to participate: Help us plan future events Join the conversations on our talkpage Become a member Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188 Online events: New: Climate and environment | Public domain Contest (Jan-Feb-Mar): Africa contest Year-long initiative: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2020 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191 Online events: New: Black women | Classicists | Folklore Contest (Jan/Feb/Mar): Africa Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The article Jinyu Liu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and does not meet any of the qualifications of WP:NSCHOLAR. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jinyu Liu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinyu Liu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Srsval, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Srsval, for your kind attention to the biographies I have created over the past couple of weeks. I usually try to work on women from outside the English-speaking world as there are literally thousands of editors who can work in English. With Marguerite Naville I seem to have exhausted my list of notable classicists from around Europe. I have looked at the background of many others, including those on the redlists, but while some of them might theoretically be acceptable as full professors, there's very little about them in secondary sources. If you nevertheless come across any you think deserve biographies, please let me know and I'll see what I can do.--Ipigott (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ipigott:, your pages are fantastic! It's great to see such diversity of women classicists, I'm learning a lot and find out about new people! I'm also so pleased to see that you're able to get images onto pages too. When I come across a woman classicist in need of a page I tend to add it to the Wikipedia Project Page: Women's Classical Committee, but I can fill your talk page too if you'd like! I'm particularly keen on editing pages for LGBTQ+ women classicists this month (February) as it's LGBTQ+ History Month, so if you stumble across any historical LGBTQ+ women classicists, do let me know! Thanks Srsval (talk) 09:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As for the images, I usually write biographies on women of historic interest. As a result, there are frequently images available which are out of copyright. I find these preferable to fair use images to EN articles as Commons images can be used in all the other language versions and on Wikidata. I have looked at Wikipedia:Women's Classical Committee but cannot find any redlists apart from Wikipedia:Women's Classical Committee/Wikidata redlist. Can you give me a more specific link? I'm sure there must be many more than those already on Wikidata. Good luck with your LGBTQ+ developments.--Ipigott (talk) 09:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193 Online events: New: Art+Activism | VisibleWikiWomen Contest (Jan/Feb/Mar): Africa Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Before you mess up the article Grace O'Malley again, I advice you to read the talk page. The Banner talk 20:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196 Online events: New: Plants & gardens | Gender studies New Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198 Online events: New: May Mays | Mental Health Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman See also: Wikimedia District of Columbia: 100 DC Women contest Wikimedia CEE Spring: Central and Eastern European Women contest The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

thank you for thanking meee Greentowel80 (talk) 14:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201 Online events: New: Wiki Loves Pride | June Junes | Jewellers & Watchmakers Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205 Online events: New: July Julies | Finance, economics & banking | Olympic & Paralympic Games New contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: "Mind your elders" Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

For all your amazing #WCCWiki co-ordination!

KateCook (talk) 13:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207 Online events: New: Indigenous women | Women's leadership & empowerment Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Olympic & Paralympic Games | Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208 Online events: New: Women writers & their works Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's leadership & empowerment | Olympic & Paralympic Games Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Learn more about our proposed one-day online recruitment initiative in October. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | × × €4.95 / month Favourites List Audio Listining Color Mode Monthly New Updates Fullname * Email * Credit or debit card Subscribe A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Undefined variable: userid Filename: user/popup_modal.php Line Number: 68 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_modal.php Line: 68 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 478 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once "> Subscribe Now Premium Membership × €4.95 € 9.90 / month Create a Premium Account quick and easy Save your Favourite Pages Listen to any page in Audio Colour Night Mode Create your Account Modal title × Close Save changes Cancel Subscription × User_talk:Srsval" id="cancelSubscription" name="cancelSubscription" class="mb-0"> Are you sure you want to cancel your membership with us? A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Undefined variable: user_membership Filename: user/popup_modal.php Line Number: 192 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_modal.php Line: 192 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 478 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Warning Message: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() Filename: user/popup_modal.php Line Number: 192 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_modal.php Line: 192 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 478 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Undefined variable: userid Filename: user/popup_modal.php Line Number: 208 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_modal.php Line: 208 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 478 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once "> Yes Cancel Continue Subscription Harry Potter Books × A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Undefined variable: products Filename: user/popup_harry_book.php Line Number: 24 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_harry_book.php Line: 24 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 479 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Warning Message: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() Filename: user/popup_harry_book.php Line Number: 24 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_harry_book.php Line: 24 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 479 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once