User talk:Hildabast

Hello, HB-NCBI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please come and see us at WT:WikiProject Medicine.

RexxS (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 18:49, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome from here too! -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Remember if you have any questions or concerns you have our ears, just contact drop us a note. Peter.C • talk • contribs 16:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see you! —MistyMorn (talk) 17:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes nicely done :-) There is so much that needs fixing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your talk page please reply on mine) 00:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your talk page contributions look excellent too :) So much that needs, erm... "conveying". —MistyMorn (talk) 17:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hilda,

I am about to chime in, but have yet to find any articles that are being worked on. Pointers appreciated. Thanks! -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 19:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		WikiProject Medicine / United States National Library of Medicine Editathon - May 2013
		English: Thank you for your participation in the National Library of Medicine Editathon, May 28 and 30, 2013! We are so glad to have met you, and look forward to working with you at many more fun editathon events! Duckduckgo (talk) 13:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Many thanks for making the NIH edit-a-thon a reality. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 22:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your interest in updating the ketogenic diet article has prompted me to have another look on PubMed. It seems the journal authors have been busy since I last had a proper look. Since it has been three years since it was last overhauled, I've started compiling a list of new sources to examine. See Talk:Ketogenic diet/NewSources. Given my glacial editing speed and lack of free time, this could take a while. Are you interested in helping? What is your journal access like? Colin°^Talk 21:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My journal access couldn't be better (I'm at the National Library of Medicine), but I also have the free time problem. What I could do is myself up to watch out for any trial (I know, unlikely, but if one were to emerge, would want to know about it) and good reviews, and if you had a section for those, I'd post those. Hildabast (talk) 02:07, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the Chemical Heritage Foundation Edit-a-Thon, June 20, 2013. Build content relating to women in science, chemistry and the history of science. Use the hashtag #GlamCHF and write your favorite scientist or chemist into Wikipedian history!

Great job on the NIH Meetup! It was fun to meet you and to visit the facilities. We're having an Edit-a-thon at CHF this week (with both in person and virtual attendance). Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Get free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

• Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
• Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
• If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hildabast,

In response to your WT:MED query, the easiest and most flexible way I know of building references from PMID without using the automated Cite PMID template is to use the Cite journal template via a form which appears as a pop-up within the default Wikipedia interface.

1. In the default editing window, locate drop-down Templates menu at the left of the main toolbar: to visualize it, you may may need to click on Advanced and then Cite in the main toolbar.
2. From the drop-down Templates menu, select cite journal, which will evoke the form as a pop-up.
3. Enter your PMID (or a doi) in the pop-up form and click on the magnifying glass icon alongside. This will fill in the form and allow you to do further editing such as adding the url, PMCID, doi etc (for certain actions, such as entering the PMCID you'll need to click on Show/hide extra fields).
4. You can preview/parse what you're doing (as well as checking the details of the reference, I like to clean up a few details in the automated text, such as a superfluous period that gets inserted at the end of the article title).
5. When you're ready, just click Insert and you're done.

I know there are ways of editing the output of the Cite PMID template, but like you I haven't found it particularly intuitive. Hope that helps, —81.157.7.7 (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - yes, that's what I do, and people sometimes go in afterwards and add the PMID to the reference and then the work was all for naught, because the URL was somewhere else (like the author's university website, or a different PubMed database than PubMed or PMC) and it's lost - or at least, it seems to me it always want to use the PMID as the link and ignores the other link, but I'll try again. Hildabast (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that - out of my depth there, I'm afraid. —81.157.7.7 (talk) 18:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at this diff: [1]. For me at least the link from the title to the pdf of the full text worked fine both with [2] and without [3] the PMID. Of course, the PMID link itself (ie PMID 2501523) will always redirect to the PubMed entry because that's what these PMID links do. 81.157.7.7 (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'l try again next time - thanks! Hildabast (talk) 10:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. (This ip thinks you're a great contributor!) 81.157.7.7 (talk) 13:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's so nice! Thanks! I have a lot to learn, but I'll get there. Hildabast (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It worked - goodness knows what I did wrong before! Thanks! Hildabast (talk) 21:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Just spotted the link to your blog. Lovely! I've sent it to friends.

Btw, perhaps I should apologise for not having seen your reply here [4] before posting mine a bit further down [5] - it may have all looked a bit strange... Anyway, over to you, young Goldilocks! 86.161.251.139 (talk) 16:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, you look to be on your way here to your next Gold.... And your communication skills will help you avoid setting the best against the good 86.161.251.139 (talk) 10:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC) #bear-of-very-little-brain[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miscarriage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CVS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You could bring up the discussion on the talk page again Talk:Mental retardation. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just wondering why this [.nice.org.uk/glandular-fever] doesn't seem to turn up here [6] (cf [7]) Am I missing something?

Also, when I click the Systematic reviews filter button I get the patient-oriented A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia. Is that perhaps because ADAM takes his information from systematic reviews?
86.161.251.139 (talk) 10:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

G'day! We don't have the Clinical Knowledge Summaries at PubMed Health, although we're thinking about it. They're not systematic reviews though - we're in the process of going the health technology assessment agencies getting their systematic reviews, not everything that they do. We've been concentrating on building up the systematic review collection, and consumer information, so we still don't have a lot of clinician information. We digitise the NICE clinical practice guidelines because they conduct systematic reviews to do those, so it's the systematic review that we're including. A.D.A.M. is the medical encyclopaedia content we currently use - it's separate from the systematic review content (although unfortunately at the moment if you use a Boolean operator in the search absolutely everything comes up in the centre - which is on my to do list to see about changing). About what we do for encyclopaedia content - that pre-dated my arrival. "Watch this space", basically. 98.233.38.200 (talk) 12:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doh! The first question was a bit of a dumb one... I asked because, although not strictly speaking a systematic review, the clinical information contained in the Clinical Knowledge Summary appears to have been based on NICE assessment [.nice.org.uk/glandular-fever#!supportingevidence] of literature gathered with a somewhat systematic search strategy [.nice.org.uk/glandular-fever#!searchstrategyforpublication]—a factor which led me to weight it highly (as an "ideal source") when trying to provide pertinent descriptive information here.
86.161.251.139 (talk) 06:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fwiw, the idea of PMH ID numbers you mentioned (somewhere) seems to me a worthwhile one. Support... 86.130.63.47 (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being here and doing what you're doing. (You too IP!) --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 18:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, that is so nice! Thank you! Hildabast (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see you around again, Hilda! (And thanks to Anthony too!) 86.130.63.47 (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been over three weeks since you posted to your GA review here. What is left to be done on the article or its review, and will they be done soon? Please post there at your earliest opportunity. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, I got caught up in work projects. Should be finished this week. Hildabast (talk) 20:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Hildabast,

All the sources I have been consulting recently for edits to IQ classification and related articles strongly agree that terminology has changed, and what was formerly known as Mental retardation is now called Intellectual disability. The ICD 10 system of terminology appears to be the only one that hasn't fully made the switch, but the reliable secondary sources aren't waiting, and DSM-5 has made the switch. The National Library of Medicine medical subject heading has made the switch also. So I think that the two existing articles need to be merged. I have been reading up on the Wikipedia documentation about how to merge two articles with long edit histories, and that is not easy. I am willing to do all the work, but first of all I will gather the source citations to post to the talk pages of both articles. I hope you will look on as I do the work to make I sure merge the articles correctly. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 02:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vision (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at THATCamp Philly, September 27, 2013, held at the Chemical Heritage Foundation. Bring your own content to work on, or get an early start on Ada Lovelace Day with our resources about women in science, chemistry and the history of science. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 15:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no problem about reviewing your article! You earned it by making one that follows all of the guidelines of Wikipedia's new page requirements!

Tritario (talk) 13:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hilda.

I'd like to upgrade all of our coverage of the NIH, so I've just started three articles:

• National Institutes of Health Clinical Research Training Program
• Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
• National Institutes of Health Common Fund

Do you know anyone at NIH that might be willing to review completed articles or offer me guidance on content or sources as I go? Ideally, I'm looking for someone with a good grasp of NIH's structure, history and functions, whose job description covers this kind of thing. If you can't think of anyone, is there someone at NIH with overall responsibility for their online presence that I could talk to about this? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 13:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - as you may have noticed, the {{unreviewed}} tag was already removed. I'm not positive, but I'm fairly sure it would have been fine for you to do that once it was reviewed. Heck, there's probably a bot for the purpose.

Be well!

Quantumobserver (talk) 04:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

uh.... finally followed your link to this page and the NIH. I didn't realize exactly how much of an expert you are in bringing Cochrane reviews to the masses - thank for participating in the discussion. I've added a couple of (less defensive) points at the talk page. Ian Furst (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links to PubMed Health, new site to me. Read through the wisdom teeth pages [8] and [9]. Wanted to send on some feedback - not sure if this is a good place or not, if not - please ignore. The "Wisdom teeth: is it better to take them out" is out of date (reflects an older Cochrane study?) and refers to a 1% permanent sensory nerve injury rate (overestimate, from the majority of literature). The fact sheet refers to paracetamol (North Americans' are unlikely to know what this is) and "paralysis around the tooth" (motor nerve impairment) which is not a complication of the surgery. Finally, the fact sheet states, "Impacted wisdom teeth do not cause problems for most people." but I don't think the statement is based on longitudinal studies where impacted wisdom teeth that communicate with the mouth are retained (which, generally, show a progressive age-correlated periodontitis and resorption on the adjacent teeth). It appears the statement is based on the RCT which either removed or retained the teeth. I wasn't sure if this is something that gets updated frequently (or if something you would normally look at), but I thought I'd type. Ian Furst (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a minute, can you take a look at the plain language summary for intervention review on dentin hypersensitivity. I need to put a summary in the article on toothache in the prognosis section. When I read the review, it states that the meta-analysis shows 6 studies met criteria, all six showed objective improvements in hypersensitivity. Three of six, assessed subjective improvement in hypersensitivity and none found any difference. The PL summary reads, "This review of trials found there was not enough evidence to show that potassium is effective in desensitising teeth. More research is needed." without reference to the objective assessments. Do you think we should be including a short statement about the effect? Something like "The authors from a Cochrane review concluded that there was a decrease in sensitivity when tested with dental instruments or blasts of cold air, but subjectively the patients found no difference with the use of the toothpaste" or does the lack of data preclude us from stating a conclusion regarding objective assessment. Thank you for any help. Ian Furst (talk) 01:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good effort and excellent declaration on article Lisa Bero.

Jrcrin001 (talk) 01:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.[reply]

Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 08:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 02:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 03:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 18:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. 02:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks for the editathon. i should have cleaned up the list now. should ping User talk:Antony-22 for some DYK's. Duckduckstop (talk) 14:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Nora Volkow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! George Ho (talk) 06:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Link for prose count: User:Dr pda/prosesize. Hope this helps. --George Ho (talk) 21:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Nina Starr Braunwald at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 22:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Vivian Pinn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusunW (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vivian Pinn, which you recently nominated. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vivian Pinn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 12:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Judith Vaitukaitis, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Judith Vaitukaitis developed the chemical technique for the first home pregnancy test after trying to use it to diagnose cancer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Judith Vaitukaitis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 22:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 23:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

		The Bio-star
		For braving the DYK process not just once, but four times simultaneously as a newcomer, to promote articles about women in biomedical sciences. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 21:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nina Starr Braunwald, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Nina Starr Braunwald designed, fabricated and implanted the first successful artificial mitral heart valve replacement in a human? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nina Starr Braunwald. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1219 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:00, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015 Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "physical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and learn more: →here← --Rosiestep (talk) 03:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For writing Mary Logan Reddick, a fantastic article that additionally helps move the systemic bias scales :). Keep up the good work! Ironholds (talk) 23:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join us!
	Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon - a Year of Science initiative Hosts: Women in Red, Women Scientists Sponsor: WikiEdu April-December 2016 #wikiwomeninred #yearofscience #contentgap

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]

You have expressed interest in the GLAM-Wiki US Consortium, so you may be interested in attending the GLAM Boot Camp next month in Washington, DC. This is a training designed to help Wikipedians interested in guiding museums, libraries, and other cultural institutions in wiki engagement. Travel funding available for those in North America. Since the event is coming up soon, please be sure to add your name to the page if you are interested -- and please pass this announcement along. (You may want to share on Facebook or on Twitter.) Thanks for your interest! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies - here is the link for the GLAM Boot Camp mentioned above: Wikipedia:GLAM/Boot Camp. -Pete (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You participated once in improving the page on bronchiectasis. In particular today, I am looking for support in reconciling and improving on two entries on Wikipedia involving a related lung disorder called MAC: 1.  about MAI, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycobacterium_avium-intracellulare_infection 2.  about MAC proper, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycobacterium_avium_complex Five years ago a discussion was started on whether to merge the two entries, but no decision was reached. In addition, there are several problems with the existing texts, which I would describe when I hear back from you. I can edit, but need to find professional helpers for changes to substance. Can yu refer me? Others are encouraging me to do this (I have some legitimacy ;-). Seniorexpat (talk) 14:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)  [reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sophie Lutterlough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monroe, New Jersey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DPL bot! Fixed Hildabast (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated an article of yours for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Louise Nixon Sutton. The main page and Wikipedia itself are severely lacking on the percentage of women articles, much less African-American women articles. SL93 (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! If it's not too old, this one I did in the last week of March is more a DYK candidate: Carolyn Parker.Hildabast (talk) 22:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. DYK articles have to be created in the last 7 days or else I would have loved to consider nominating it. SL93 (talk) 22:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've got lots more to do - will ping you, SL93, when I have a great one! Hildabast (talk) 22:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. That would be great. SL93 (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just read it SL93 - I don't know if anyone else got a PhD from NYU in a different field - Louise was definitely first for mathematics.Hildabast (talk) 22:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC) Sorry about that - I fixed the intro line on the page. Hildabast (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. I fixed it. SL93 (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Thyrsa Frazier Svager at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's not clear why you did a review on a DYK nomination that another editor was in the middle of. As you can see, he noted that no QPQ was done, yet you went ahead and approved it. We need more help with reviews; please choose one that someone else hasn't started next time. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Yoninah, I didn't realize when I started, that that was the case. I'm still finding the setup confusing. I'll be more careful. Hildabast (talk) 02:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Drop me a line on my talk page if you have questions. Yoninah (talk) 09:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Yoninah Hildabast (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Thyrsa Frazier Svager at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 00:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 01:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Hildablast, thanks for your message. We have a time difference, so I'm responding now.

• Yes, those "Reviewed" lines on the nomination template indicate the QPQ that the nominator is submitting with his/her hook.
• Regarding your review of Template:Did you know nominations/My Brother's Husband, you covered newness, length, and referencing, but do not mention neutrality or close paraphrasing. Here are the five main DYK criteria that need to be checked. Neutrality means the article is written without being pro or against the subject, and is not promotional. Close paraphrasing means that lines haven't been lifted from the sources; you can check close paraphrasing with this tool (I inserted the page name already, and made sure to un-click "Use search engine" so the tool will only check the sources in the Wikipedia article, not on the whole Web).
• The QPQ submitted for this nomination is not complete; it does not cover all five criteria. I put a notice on that QPQ review (in future, as the reviewer, you could do that, too).
• You put the notification template on the DYK review itself. It should be placed on the nominator's talk page. (I did that for you, too.)
• If you suggest a new hook that includes new hook facts, you need to ask for another reviewer to complete the review, using the red icon at the bottom of the list: {{subst:DYK?again}}. (You can still claim it as one of your QPQs, though.) But if you just suggest rewriting/shortening/combining hook facts that the nominator has suggested, you can complete the review.
• Best, Yoninah (talk) 08:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you SO much, @Yoninah: Hildabast (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Did this one crash somehow or is everything normal, @Yoninah:? It never got the tick, but also can't edit it any more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Alma_Levant_Hayden Hildabast (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Alberta Jones Seaton, Hildabast!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added a biography tag on the talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 11:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ms. Bastian. Just been looking through recently created articles and I've noticed that you're not marked as autopatrolled, so your articles go in the review queue. I can see you know what you're doing, so would you be willing to be nominated to be autopatrolled to save time? Happy to make the nomination for you if you want. Blythwood (talk) 11:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Blythwood:- yes, that would be great!Hildabast (talk) 11:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Georgia Ann Robinson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hildabast, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 19:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Schwede66: And thanks a lot for the tips - will do! Hildabast (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SoWhy 12:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Dear Ms Bastian

My name is Cordula Matthias, and I am a collaborator and friend of Dr. Lloyd Demetrius. Since you were so kind as to add the title of his dissertation, I would like to ask you if you could also update the photo in his Wikipedia entrance. It is over 50 years old, and does not represent the mature person he is now. He would be very grateful if you could replace it by the photo on his Harvard website (https://mcz.harvard.edu/people/lloyd-demetrius).

Thank you very much in advance and best wishes

                                               Cordula Matthias  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B023:2C01:5E70:78DB:1ABB (talk) 22:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]  

Hello - I would be happy to add a photo, but the copyright of that one is unclear to me. To be used on Wikipedia, the photo should be in Wikimedia Commons, which means it needs to be copyright-free. Hildabast (talk) 01:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ms. Bastian

Now you will find a recent photo in Wiki Commons.

Thank you very much in advance for your efforts!

Best wishes

            Cordula Matthias  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B0F6:5070:7FA6:70B3:D583 (talk) 16:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]  

Thank you - done! Hildabast (talk) 23:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ms. Bastian

Thank you very much indeed for updating the photo on Lloyd Demetrius' Wikipedia site! - However, there is one last request: It was felt that one photo was sufficient, and that the topical one in that big format seemed to dominate the scientific content of the site. Could that be amended?

I apologize for bothering you again.

With best regards

                 Cordula Matthias  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B0BC:2829:B920:BD24:DD7 (talk) 11:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]  

I reduced the size of the main photo, but I left both of them there. Seeing a person at different ages is great. Hildabast (talk) 11:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ms. Bastian

Thank you very much for adjusting the size of the more recent photo of Lloyd Demetrius. - Concerning keeping the 50 year old photo: Two portraits at different ages would be very unusual for a Wikipedia site of a scientist. Wouldn't that distract from the purpose of the site, to inform about scientific accomplishments?

Warm regards

               Cordula Matthias  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B0BC:2829:B920:BD24:DD7 (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]  

No, it's not unusual to have multiple photos, if they are available (see for example Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein). No, the purpose of Wikipedia biographies is not to focus only on professional lives. Hildabast (talk) 00:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the comparisons you make are very flattering ;-), - though a bit out of proportion.

Best wishes

            Cordula Matthias  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B0A4:587D:3989:BF86:7717 (talk) 07:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]  

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda Arendt! Hildabast (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Hildabast (talk) 03:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]