User talk:Nedim Ardoğa

						TODAY IS
Home	Talk	My Articles	My Images	Contributions	Awards	Thursday, 7 November 2024

This page may contain some text written in the Turkish language.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13

HAPPY NEW YEAR The page created by you is under Greek ultranationalists attack. Could you please correct the name of "liberation of İzmir" and lock the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.209.32.73 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that you have been involved in an edit war with an IP over this family tree. Why don't you submit a request at WP:RFP? The admins should be able to protect the page for you to correct the information. Keivan.f^Talk 21:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Little help about turkish names in space (Mercury)- Sinan (crater) (Mercury)- Berkel (crater) (Venus)- Guzel (crater) (Venus)- Faina (crater) (Pluto)- Nasreddin (crater) Loveisthebest1 (talk) 17:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be glad to help. But please be more specific. Do you want info about the names ?Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking if you want to add more to the page, you can copy and paste only. Happy new year amca :) Loveisthebest1 (talk) 16:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change the image? You put an old picture in. The Chruch is one of the most visible and oldest buildings in the district, why did that picture bother you? The Mersinli (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you search the history of the church image in Commons, you can see that the image has been loaded by me. How can the image bother me? I uploaded it to be used in WP. But it is not a typical image of Akdeniz district. When used in the sidebox, the image should be more representative. So I changed it . But the church image can still be used elsewhere in the article. Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Their title after Ebul Kasim Saltuk Bey was not Bey it was Sultan/Melik Sythid (talk) 15:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a Turkish source https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/seyahat/kars-kalesi-nerede-kars-kalesi-tarihi-ozellikleri-ve-hakkinda-bilgi-41513551

another one https://www.castles.nl/kars-castle

They were descended of the Caliph Ali ibn Abu Talib through Imam Muhammad Baqir one of the Saltukid Sultanates descendedents are Sari Saltuk they are of Alevi not sunni here is info about sari saltuk and his family tree http://isamveri.org/pdfdrg/D01093/2005_34/2005_34_SALTIKV.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sythid (talk • contribs) 15:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to Islam Ansiklopedisi their title was bey. [1] The title Sultan was used only by the Seljuks. On the other hand I found no info about a possible connection between Saltukids and Sarı Saltuk. Sarı Saltuk was a follower of Kaykaus II and he lived in Dobruja. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After Ebul Kasim Saltuq Bey the founder of the dynasty their descendents including Sari Saltuk

Sari Saltuk'un Soy Ağacı ( Family Tree )

1- Hz. ALI 

2- iMAM HASAN 2- (3)-IMAM HÜSEYiN (626-680 Kerbela'da öl.) 3- (4)-ZEYNEL ABiDiN (659-713 Emeviler zehirledi) 4- (5)-1. MUHAMMET BAKIR (676- 733 Emeviler öl.) 5- (6)-1. CAFER. SADIK (699·765 Abbasiler zehirledi) 6- (7)-1. MUSA KAzlM (745-799 Ab.zeh.) 7-(6}-I. ALI RJZA (770-819 Ab. Zehirledi.) 8-(9)-1.MUHAMMETCEVATTAKI (810-835Ab.öldürdü.) Hacı Bektaş Veli/ 2005-34 13 1O. 1. ALI HADi NAKi (830- 868 Ab.öl.l 11-1. HASAN ASKER (846-873 Ab.öl.l 12- 1. MEHDi (869-874 Ab.yok et.) -( . )- 9- S. MUSA ARAÇ 10. S. MUHAMMET (Nişabur Dergahı Piri) 11- S. YAHYA 12- S. CAFER 13- S. HÜSEYiN 14- S. UBEYDULLAH 15- S. ABDULGANI 16- S. MUHAMMET BUHAR! 16- S. ABDULAZIZ 17- EBUL KASIM SALTUK 18- S. ALI SALTUK 18- EMiR GAZI SALTUK 19-iZZITTIN SALTUK 20. MUHAMMET BEDRITTIN MANSUR (BABA MANSUR) 21- MELiK ŞAH SALTUK 22-ŞERIF HIZIR (SARI SALTUK) 111 MUZAFFEREDDIN ISMAIL

No. 22 Is Sari Saltuk You can also see how they descend from the Caliph Ali ibn Abu Talib

And on many different sites in turkish sources it states they ruled with the title of Malik (King) and Sultan , if you search up who built the Kars Castle it was by Firuz Akay who was the vizier of Saltuk Sultan Melik Izzeddin Saltuk it even says it in the sign outside the castle his Title is King/Sultan

Why would a beylik have vassals as the Kars Emirate was a vassal of the Saltukids i dont think a beylik commands more authority to hold vassals Also Mama Hatun was known as “Melike” Mama Hatun and Melike means Queen.

Unless Bey does not mean prince and means King as the speech that edebali said to Otman Ghazi (Osman) was “ O my son , Now you are King “ Which in turkish is “ Ey Ogul , Beysin”

According to Georgian Sources aswell The ancestors of Sultan/Melik Izzeddin Saltuks were also belonging to the Oghuz Rulers and Seljuks

If you think i am lying or toying around i advise you research thoroughly into Turkish sources not a english persons perspective of it like many others do on wiki (the website isn’t even reliable hahah)

Sythid (talk) 01:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nedim, I suspect this section of Ibrahim is written using some rather unreliable sources. Would you mind taking a look?

• [2]

Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I haven't check the sources. But his obsession with fat women is well known. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I was just browsing article Women in Turkey. The article seems to have links to articles in Arabic, Persian, French and Italian but there is no link to any Turkish language Wikipedia article. Why that should be so? whether there is no article in Turkish language Wikipedia devoted to Women in Turkey or article is there but not connected so far?

May be you are aware, I asked you this question since you seem to have edited article Women in Turkey previously.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Five years!

We cherish your contributions. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RIP ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 15:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I found your profile and admire you for your knowledge. May you rest in peace. Yaizer (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ereğli (Zonguldak) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Afşin (district) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Malatya Central District indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankara'dan Abim Geldi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankara'dan Abim Geldi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The article Afshar Beylik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Following the AfD nomination months ago, which I had withdrawn, I've tried finding reliable sources about this but with no success. The article is largely unreferenced with one non-RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bozcaada (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Public parks in Turkey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public parks in Turkey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.