User talk:ONEder Boy

Hello, ONEder Boy! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Anastasia Christ.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 30 June 2005 12:16 (UTC)

Thanks for posting the source. I've verified it and tagged the image as a {{promophoto}}, as per the image copyright tag policy. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 30 June 2005 21:49 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:DaleneKurtis.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Thanks so much. --feydey 03:41, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just wondering why all of the links on the Van Halen article were removed. Was there something wrong with them? Thanks. --Chevan 13:23, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I didn't even know I had done that. I had only meant to fix the heavy metal disambiguation link. If there's any way to revert it back to original that would probably be best. If not, I'll fix it. --ONEder Boy 03:14, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I give you a buzz. Have you PERSONALLY seen these things ? NO! I am NOT ridiculing,abusing,disrespecting you at all. I've had one horiffic CE-3+ when I was a kid living in TX., many CE-1s. Martial Law 20:38, 29 October 2005 (UTC) :)[reply]

I am referring to the Phoenix Lights.Martial Law

Did you see these things personally ? While I was in the Florida area, near Gulf Breeze,FL. doing some metal detecting, I had seen one "light" hovering in one spot until a civilian plane flew too close to it, it then reacted by dissappearing, just like when a light is turned off. I had also seen a BLACK sphere hovering over Panama City,FL. itself. Once while I was in AR., I had seen a "fleet" of identical ships travelling to the WNW. Each one was so large, that a B-52 can easily land on it as if the ship was a runway on land.This is one of many CE-1s that I've had.I've also shot a photo of a unknown object while I was in the Phoenix area, getting a RV's factory defects fixed. It appears to be either one of those triangles or smaller ships. The Florida Sphere looked like a 8-Ball, only it had NO 8 on it, just a totally black sphere. Did you also have any other CE-?s(CE is "Close Encounter of the.......... kind. CE-1 is that a UFO is in your area, and you see it, while a CE-3 means that aliens are seen, or are in contact with the witness(es). A CE-3+ means that the aliens abduct you, examine you,force you to commit sex acts with other people, aliens, aliens stick BB sized devices up your nose to get them to your brain, experiment on you, terrorize you,etc.) My CE-3+ was that aliens had landed on property my family had in TX. repeatedly, and we also had to deal with trigger happy idiots. Has THAT ever happened to you ?

Actually, I have yet to even see one. But I'm still waitin to see them. ONEder Boy 06:15, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Go to an area that is FAR from any city lights, airports, take along a 10M Candlepower light (there are some featured in hunting and/or outfitters magazines), so that if you see a suspect "light", you shine your light on it, but make certain that it is NOT a plane, or you may end up in Joe Arpaio's jail. The intent is to see a UFO,NOT end up in jail. When a light is applied to one of these things, it'll either move someplace else VERY rapidly, or it'd dissappear, fly towards you, to pick you up. You'll also need some optical aids, like 10x, even 40x binoculars, small telescope, one, to make sure your target is NOT a plane, two, to get a GOOD look at the UFO,even spot aliens in said UFO. You'll also have to prepare for desert survival, due to the snakes,some spiders and some cacti will cause festering wounds. You're after UFOs,NOT trying to get yourself killed or end up in the hospital, so use common sense. It would be a good idea to get a GOOD video camera. To avoid the snakes,scorpions and the like, get a LARGE pick-up, and use the bed AS a OP(Observation Post), and use common sense. I know what that desert is like.

Remember, you'll be out looking for UFOs,NOT trying to end up in Joe Arpaio 's Tent Jail. NOT ending up in the hospital &/or dead, so Use common sense and prepare yourself for desert survival, the terrain you'll be in to see your first of many UFOs.

So, use common sense, and you may see your FIRST UFO, and even tell your buds about it, and show them pics and videotapes of it. Just do NOT report it to ANY authorities, or you may end up being ridiculed,abused,even end up made a example of by being committed to a mental hospital, due to the presence of a alleged govt. sponsored campaign to stop people reporting UFO/Alien encounters. See UFO for more, especially UFO Conspiracies, in relation to a recomendation made to make people who see/encounter these things look like idiots and fools.Martial Law 21:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC) :)[reply]

You may even get lucky and see your first aliens, usually those little Grey aliens the tabloid media is so fond of. Remember touse common sense and be careful out there so that your buds, others can also see what you had shot with your equipment.Martial Law 21:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC) :)[reply]

You DID state that you wanted to see a UFO. Still want to go find one ?Martial Law 19:13, 4 November 2005 (UTC) :)[reply]

Yeah, someday yeah, i would like to see one. ONEder Boy 19:44, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The govt. campaign to ridicule,etc. all who see UFOs and the like is The Robertson Panel and/or The Brookings Report.Martial Law 03:02, 18 November 2005 (UTC) This is why you do NOT report UFOs publically, nor to the authorities.Martial Law 03:08, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See Article:Contact Consequences[edit]

This article depicts what MAY happen,should there be alien contact. All regs. have been followed. It depicts internal sources of info. used to set this article up, so that people will have an idea of what to expect should there be alien contact. How would you like to see in ALL media, say one hour from now, that ET has found this planet ? Alien contact can happen anytime. How many star systems are with-in a 150 light year radius, in all directions from our system ? That is how long that Earth has been transmitting.

The article ended up being deleted, it will be merged later.Martial Law 22:41, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted your edits to Yang Xinhai and Hu Wanlin. I'm sure you meant well and wanted to sort the categories correctly. However, most Chinese names are in the form (Surname GivenName), for example Mao Zedong, whose surname is Mao. Yang Xinhai's surname is Yang, and Hu Wanlin's surname is Hu. (You might check Chinese name if you are interested). Happy editing, Kusma (talk) 05:59, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

-- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 11:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heard that a movie is being made about the STILL(See Jeff Rense's homepage also see UFO Casebook's homepage) ongoing UFO incident, and heard it is a horror flick. Will it be like Fire in the Sky which is a horror filled movie about what happened to Travis Walton ?Martial Law 05:05, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In that, he got picked up by aliens, brutally examined,upon release back to Earth, he then was ridiculed as persuant to the recomendations to both the Robertson Panel and the Brookings Report. This was based on what happened to Travis Walton.Martial Law 05:08, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thr Robertson Panel protocol and/or the Brookings Report ?Martial Law 00:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Both are intended to make people who see UFOs appear to be idiots and fools. It is(the former) a CIA project initiated to eliminate interest in these things.Martial Law 00:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do NOT know the origin of the Brookings Report yet.Martial Law 00:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI I've rolled back your listing of this film as a 2007 release. Production of the film has not yet been announced, yet alone for a 2007 release. If you haven't seen it yet, I invite your comment on the Star Trek XI talk page to my concerns about the article. If someone AFD's it, I do not think it would survive the challenge. It's too crystal ball at the moment. 23skidoo 03:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I hope you're well. I noticed that you recently edited the Darth Vader article. A vote is currently underway to determine if this article should or should not actually be two: one for Darth Vader, and another for Anakin Skywalker.

If you're so inclined, I encourage you to vote promptly. Your vote here or there can make a difference. Thanks again for your consideration, and happy holidays! E Pluribus Anthony 20:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for helping with starting off that article on the USA PATRIOT Act! - Ta bu shi da yu 05:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem. Glad I could be of assistance, and if you need any more just let me know.ONEder Boy 05:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop putting an INFO. BOX! -Cigammagicwizard

Thanks for uploading Image:Grind.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 10:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you have contributed a lot to the List of notable films, you might find interesting the discussion on follow-up on the talk page. Any input would be appreciated :-) AdamSmithee 20:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 1% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 19:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I like what you're doing with USA PATRIOT Act, Title V, but shouldnt this be moved to Wikisource? KI 21:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It probably should ONEder Boy 22:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, an anonymous editor, with no summary, on someone's userpage, is something that I make sure is just the user not logged in :) In this case, it wasn't, so I reverted! :D Jude(talk,contribs) 00:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vegas Vacation Poster.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Dethomas 00:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to UFO Casebook's homepage to see a video of a TUBE shaped UFO that was shot on 3-13-06 over Phoenix, Arizona. This UFO incident, in spite of what others have said, is not over at all. It started in 1997. The Phoenix Lights article should be renamed to reflect the still ongoing UFO activity. Martial Law 20:56, 14 March 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Jeff Rense also gets pixes of UFOs that have been photographed over Phoenix, Arizona. Martial Law 20:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

I suggest renaming the article The Phoenix UFO Incident to reflect the still ongoing activity. Martial Law 21:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up my "John Doe" thing. I copied and pasted from the infobox already existing in my Sandbox. Guess I should've read it over first. Thanks. :) --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 20:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:JuliaSchultz.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is your invite to Wikipedia:Paranormal Watchers. RSVP ASAP. Martial Law 02:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Hi there,

I see that you are a pro-Cannabis Wikipedian so I hope this will be of some interest to you.

I've started a Marijuana wiki (aka The Sticky Wiki) which I think you might be interested in. I'm hoping you can help me get started with this project. Whereas lots of articles about weed get speedy-deleted on Wikipedia, they would be totally cool over at MarijuanaWiki. But really I want the site to be more of a marijuana community than merely an encyclopedia.

To give you an example, I want to have city guides about where to score, find pot-friendly cafes, marijuana events, and what represents a good price in that city. Etc. (You can check out the featured article: "Toronto" to see what I mean). I also want to have grow diaries and marijuana blogs. All in all, basically more communal than encyclopedic.

I am in need of admins/moderators, and people experienced with MediaWiki to help build policy, categories, and templates, etc. If you'd be interested in helping me with this project, the URL is MarijuanaWiki

Thanks for your time and consideration. Hope to see you there!

-- nsandwich 00:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed your name on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Horror membership list and am writing to all members who have not voted for the Collaboration of the month. Today is the designated selection day to choose the collaboration, but we currently have a tie between the two articles receiving the most votes, John Carpenter and Dario Argento. I am hoping to remedy this by drumming up a few more votes. Note that by voting for any nominated article (not limited to these two) you are indicating your "commitment to support and aid in collaborating on that specific article if it is chosen," so please feel absolutely free to ignore this message if for any reason you don't wish or would not be able to participate.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Welcome to WikiProject Arizona! I didn't realize that you had proposed it prior to my getting it going. I am glad to see you joining, though. I hope we can talk the other few who showed interest to join in as well. What part of the project are you interested in building? Kukini 18:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in just about anything. I'll probably just work on a little bit of everything, pretty much whatever needs work at the moment ONEder Boy 18:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great! We need a cities template, I believe. And if there is one, we need it applied throughout the cities in the project. Just a thought. Kukini 18:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And just wondering but where would something like a building or a park fall into? Would it be cities, phys. geo. or a seperate category? ONEder Boy 18:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure...try checking a few of our sister projects to see how they handled that. Perhaps we can make a separate category for it. You decide. I am good with it. Kukini 18:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ello there, Cody.. I'd rather like for you to give your input on the future of List of Sci Fi Channel (United States) programs since it may invariably suffer the same fate as Other films aired on The SciFi Channel, so please do so if time permits. It's a rather pertinant piece of information concerning the Sci Fi Channel, and its demise will prolly compromise the article quite alot. DrWho42 22:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-- Malber (talk • contribs) 17:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that you know better, and aren't a moron who honestly believes Thomas Hewitt was real person, you should know your edits to Leatherface are considered vandalism and is not tolerated.

Thank you.--CyberGhostface 19:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am so, so sorry. The previous user before you wrote some bullshit about Thomas Hewitt being a real life serial killer and I got it mixed up with your edits. Sorry.--CyberGhostface 03:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make maitenence pages in article namespace. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 23:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry23:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey...might you consider centering the newly added info to the template? I think it will look better. Kukini 07:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:PhxCityCouncilDistrict.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I love what you did with the PhxPoP template. Do you have any idea why the article is marked that it is written like an advertisement? What does something think the POP is selling? And any idea what we can do to keep someone from deleting it? I think it is notable, otherwise I wouldn't have taken the time to write it, eh? Any suggestions? CRKingston 06:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings ONEder Boy ...

Noticed that you changed the display format of the Prize Money Chart for the FBR Open.

Respectfully, the table method doesn't seem to be quite right, at least as far as the display of the place numbers and prize money amounts.

The table stretches down the page a bit, so you can't see the all of the place prizes within the confines of the browser window. Also, the sidebar information is no longer visible unless you scroll down.

I have not made any changes to the FBR page, but I have created screenshots of both display formats for comparison purposes.

A message similar to this will be on the FBR Open Talk Page.

Thanx-A-Lot, Frank Fgf2007 22:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your last edit seems to have led to some weirdness, see Decoy cars talk page for example, weird code at the bottom of all of the banners. I reverted your edit to see if that fixed it, but seems to still be happening, I don't suppose you could take another look and work out what it is? I couldn't follow what your edit was originally SGGH 19:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I was simply trying to fix the red link. I don't think I did though. ONEder Boy 22:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really like the sports team logos that you've added to the Phoenix, Arizona article, but I think you might be reverted sometime soon. A couple of months ago, some idiotic, dumbass legal assmunch removed all of the logos from sports-related infoboxes from virtually all of the city articles, claiming that it wasn't 'fair use' under copyright law. I personally disagree, because he didn't remove the logos from the wiki pages about individual teams. But the general consensus seems to have followed and there's pretty much no logos for sports teams on city articles anymore.

Not going to tell you what to do, since IANAL. Personally, I'd just leave them and if some lawyer wants them removed, then remove them. Dr. Cash 04:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Anastasia Christ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 23:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sky Lopez, by HongQiGong, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sky Lopez seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sky Lopez, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Sky Lopez itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your sk infobox shouldn't it include MO (method of operation/ modus operandi. Also maybe a distiction between disorgnized organized or both.66.176.172.119 05:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been placing your serial killer infobox on some pages, it works well so far. Jmm6f488 08:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do think it needs a penalty box though. Jmm6f488 08:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We have adopted your Serial Killer Infobox at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Criminal Biography and made you an honorary member for this contribution. Please feel free to join the project we are always looking for new members. Either way keep up the good work! Jmm6f488 06:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 12:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An automatic notification by BrownBot 00:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Nine Inch Nails WikiProject. There's alot of NIN-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few more Nine Inch Nails pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! Drewcifer (talk) 03:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vegas_Vacation_Poster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:BretEastonEllis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kikki Daire, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kikki Daire. SilkTork *^{What's YOUR point?} 00:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Campfire Tales Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The signs are at 33°26′51.3″N 112°4′34.5″W / 33.447583°N 112.076250°W / 33.447583; -112.076250. Maybe they're fairly new? Cheers - Gobeirne (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed that the Stupid Motorist Law article that you have previously edited and added to WikiProject Arizona, should be expanded to include information on similar laws in other jurisdictions. Please feel free to share your thoughts on the article's Talk page. --TommyBoy (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been invited to join the Pheonix Suns WikiProject. :D Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 18:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I didn't notice your joining. Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 18:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the assessment rating of another project as you did here unless you know the assessment criteria of the project. If you want to rate it differently for WP:Arizona then that is fine, no where does it say they must agree. That article fully meets the criteria of a "B-class" article on the WP:USRD assessment scale. Thank you. --Holderca1 ^talk 13:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Phoenix New Times, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Hi, I've put a proposed for deletion on this, which I think you wrote up in the first place. Just don't think it's noteworthy enough, although all credit for initiating an article. raining girl (talk) 23:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven years ago The Ottawa Citizen published four consecutive Editorials in four days calling for the legalization of Cannabis. Calling the Editor to commend him for such bold action, it was suggested an article be submitted for payment if published on the Op-Ed page. On submission, the Editor said, "Now we're going to have to shit or get of the pot."

It was published as a Letter To The Editor with the heart and guts edited out so that no reader would have a clear perspective or understanding of the issue. If you're interested, you can read the article in the discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Joseph_Cormier and maybe comment on the images in the article. Peace DoDaCanaDa (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BumblebeeMan.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Bagginsfamily requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hyperkinetic disorders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ONEder Boy : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bullshit (drinking game), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullshit (drinking game). Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter (Volume I, no. 1 / February 2009)

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 1 / February 2009 Next issue Project news WikiProject Horror has been under reconstruction for the past month, in hopes to re-invigorate participant activity and re-activate the Collaboration of the Month department. Please take a look at the project’s redesign and post any suggestions to the new Notice Board. Spearheading this reconstruction movement has been interim coordinator Hornoir, with assistance from Bignole. An official election for Project Coordinator and Assistant Coordinator positions will be held in the coming weeks. Any active member of the project will be able to nominate for and/or vote on the positions. Please watch the coordinator’s page for developments. WikiProject Horror currently has over 2600 articles within its scope; unfortunately, 2200 remain at Start-Class or below. Please help bring some of these articles up to (at least) B-Class. An article does not have to be the current Collaboration of the Month to gain assistance from dedicated editors like you. Nemesis, an article on the fictional character from the Resident Evil series of games, was promoted to Good Article-Class in January. The current horror-related Featured Article nominee is Bride of Frankenstein (talk • review). The current horror-related Good Article-Class candidates include Horror comics in the United States, 1947–1954 (talk • review), The Frighteners (talk • review), Raaz - The Mystery Continues (talk • review), and White Dog (talk • review). WikiProject Horror now meets all Wikipedia v. 1.0 Editorial Team criteria. Task force and related news WikiProject Saw has agreed to become a task force under WikiProject Horror. Please make them feel welcome and help them become part of our project. They are fully integrated into the {{HorrorWikiProject}} banner and their main page has been relocated to WikiProject Horror/Saw task force. A Friday the 13th WikiProject has been proposed and while the over-ridding consensus at the moment is that the scope is too small for a WikiProject proper, the proposal bears consideration as a possible task force for our project. Please comment on the proposal with your own thoughts on the matter. A Halloween task force has been proposed at the WikiProject Council. Please comment on the proposal with your support and/or thoughts on the matter. Collaboration of the Month The current Collaboration of the Month has been None. The next collaboration is due for selection on April 30, 2024, so nominate an article and/or vote on a current nomination. Announcements and open tasks WikiProject Horror Announcements and open tasks → Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages! Current Featured Article candidates (66 achieved): None Current Good Article candidates (429 achieved): None WikiProject Horror Peer Reviews: None Article alerts: Please check here for up-to-date information on horror-related article alerts. Cleanup listing: Please check here for a list of horror-related articles that may require some form of work done on them. The Collaboration of the Month is currently inactive. Nominations for Coordinator positions are currently ongoing. Feel free to add your name and comments. To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (ONEder Boy) from the Active members list and add it to the Active members not wishing to receive the Newsletter list.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cleaning up the Ralph Sall article. What the article is missing are references. Can you help with refetences? Esasus (talk) 01:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter (Volume I, no. 2 / March 2009)

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 2 / March 2009 Previous issue • Next issue Project news Nominations for the Coordinator positions are now open. The nomination process will run throughout March, with voting running throughout April. Any member of Project is welcome to nominate themselves for a Coordinator position. The Project has a new Task Center, which allows any Project member to volunteer for as a Task Editor within the Project. Task Editor positions currently open include Project Promoter, Collaboration Coordinator, Peer Review Coordinator, New & Stub Article Monitor, and Article Monitor. Our first Collaboration of the Month has been selected and it is The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. Please help out in improving the article towards Featured Article-Class. Nominations for the next Collaboration of the Month are, of course, ongoing. WikiProject Horror currently has over 3000 articles within its scope; unfortunately, 2600 remain at Start-Class or below. Please help bring some of these articles up to (at least) B-Class. An article does not have to be the current Collaboration of the Month to gain assistance from dedicated editors like you. Articles promoted to Good Article-Class in February include: Eerie (comics), The Frighteners, , Left 4 Dead , and James Whale. There is one current horror-related Featured Article nominee, which is Bride of Frankenstein (talk • review). The current horror-related Good Article-Class candidates include Raaz - The Mystery Continues (talk • review) and White Dog (talk • review). A Peer Review has been requested for Friday the 13th (franchise). The review can be found here. Task force and related news A Friday the 13th WikiProject has been proposed and while the over-ridding consensus at the moment is that the scope is too small for a WikiProject proper, the proposal bears consideration as a possible task force for our project. Please comment on the proposal with your own thoughts on the matter. A Halloween task force has been proposed at the WikiProject Council. Please comment on the proposal with your support and/or thoughts on the matter. Collaboration of the Month The current Collaboration of the Month has been None. The next collaboration is due for selection on April 30, 2024, so nominate an article and/or vote on a current nomination. Announcements and open tasks WikiProject Horror Announcements and open tasks → Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages! Current Featured Article candidates (66 achieved): None Current Good Article candidates (429 achieved): None WikiProject Horror Peer Reviews: None Article alerts: Please check here for up-to-date information on horror-related article alerts. Cleanup listing: Please check here for a list of horror-related articles that may require some form of work done on them. The Collaboration of the Month is currently inactive. Nominations for Coordinator positions are currently ongoing. Feel free to add your name and comments. To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (ONEder Boy) from the Active members list and add it to the Active members not wishing to receive the Newsletter list.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cheating Death, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mintrick (talk) 04:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 3 / April 2009 Previous issue The Coordinator nomination has been extended! Please go to the nomination page now to add yourself to the election for a coordinator position. Voting will begin on May 1st. The current Collaboration of the Month (The Texas Chain Saw Massacre) has been extended by a month! The next collaboration will be selected on April 30th, 2009. Please place suggestions for the next collaboration here and/or vote on current suggestions. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 05:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] June 2009[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010 film), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 04:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] Speedy deletion nomination of List of fraternities and sororities at Arizona State University[edit] A tag has been placed on List of fraternities and sororities at Arizona State University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Matt J User|Talk 23:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Policy on "fixing" links to redirects that are not broken[edit] Hi ONEder Boy, please note the Wikipedia policy on changing redirect links to piped links: "There is nothing inherently wrong with linking to redirects. Some editors are tempted, upon finding a link to a redirect page, to remove the redirect and point the link directly at the target page. While there are a limited number of cases where this is beneficial, it is generally an unhelpful exercise, and it can actually be detrimental." WP:NOTBROKEN Thanks! ThreeOfCups (talk) 01:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] bolding[edit] I noticed you bolded several names in Leverage (TV series). Per the WP:Manual of Style guideline MOS:BOLD we don't arbitrarily bold items in articles to make them stand out. We bold the article name, synonyms and a very few other items (table headers, section headers, and certain scholarly citations). Accordingly I've reverted. Please read the WP:Manual of Style to see what other surprises might be in store.  :-) Regards, —EncMstr (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Template:Celebreality[edit] Thanks for adding the italics. I have been thinking about reorganizing this template, since it's already a bit long. One idea would be to make either one long flat list, or, break up the list by year of the premiere. I don't know if you have any ideas or comments. Thanks. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Nomination for deletion of Template:Bagginsfamily[edit] Template:Bagginsfamily has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] Death template[edit] Please note we now have a Death project - and template ticklers are very welcome - we have work to do!! Hope you might have a look and be interested to help considering your template tinkling? SatuSuro 08:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply] Invitation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Arena Football League[edit] Because of word that the new league formerly called "Arena Football 1" has decided to take on the new Arena Football League moniker, I thought it would be a good time to revive Wikipedia:WikiProject Arena Football League. The team I adopt for this project is the Milwaukee Iron (my home team), and I am leaving this message on your talk page to (hopefully) get you interested. I notice that you're an Arizona Rattlers fan, so if you're interested, please sign up on the members list and we'll get things going again. Rejoice, for ARENA FOOTBALL IS BACK! Tom Danson (talk) 18:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] You are now a Reviewer[edit] Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] Minor edits and edit summaries[edit] Hi, ONEder Boy. I saw your addition to Lola, and while the addition is OK (borderline, but OK), it should be marked as a minor edit. It looks like most or all of your contributions are "minor" and have no edit summary. WP:MINOR covers what Wikipedia means by "minor", and the big thing to note is that minor edits won't necessarily show up on some editors' watchlists. And see WP:ES for an overview on edit summaries, which can help other editors know what you're doing even before checking the diffs. Thanks! -- JHunterJ (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] September 2010 Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Zombie. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 12:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Curiosity[edit] May I ask what made you decide to edit the Absolution article at just that exact moment that you did? I guess it, ah, seemed a little coincidental to me for some reason. -M —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.22.156.53 (talk) 03:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] Orphaned non-free image File:BumblebeeMan.gif[edit] Thanks for uploading File:BumblebeeMan.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). PLEASE NOTE: I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page. Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] Orphaned non-free image File:BumblebeeMan.gif[edit] Thanks for uploading File:BumblebeeMan.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of Stacy Marie Fuson for deletion[edit] A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stacy Marie Fuson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Marie Fuson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 02:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of Katie Lohmann for deletion[edit] A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katie Lohmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Lohmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProjeck Arizona[edit] It was recently suggested that WikiProject Arizona, to which you are a member, may be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project it appears that there haven't been much active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. I have begun a discussion on the projects talk page to see how the members of the project feel about this suggestion. Another user has added the project to the WPUS template and I added it to the list of supported projects in the WPUS main project page but before I take any further action I wanted to contact each of the active members for their input. --Kumioko (talk) 20:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States[edit] The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumioko (talk) 03:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] The Doors discography[edit] You tried to fix something that wasn't broken and instead ended up breaking it, therefore your edit was reverted. Mattchewbaca (meow) 05:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States[edit] The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumioko (talk) 04:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Disambiguation link notification[edit] Hi. When you recently edited List of films shot in Arizona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Into the Wild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC) × × €4.95 / month Favourites List Audio Listining Color Mode Monthly New Updates Fullname * Email * Credit or debit card Subscribe A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Undefined variable: userid Filename: user/popup_modal.php Line Number: 68 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_modal.php Line: 68 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 478 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once "> Subscribe Now Premium Membership × €4.95 € 9.90 / month Create a Premium Account quick and easy Save your Favourite Pages Listen to any page in Audio Colour Night Mode Create your Account Modal title × Close Save changes Cancel Subscription × User_talk:ONEder_Boy" id="cancelSubscription" name="cancelSubscription" class="mb-0"> Are you sure you want to cancel your membership with us? A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Undefined variable: user_membership Filename: user/popup_modal.php Line Number: 192 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_modal.php Line: 192 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 478 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Warning Message: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() Filename: user/popup_modal.php Line Number: 192 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_modal.php Line: 192 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 478 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Undefined variable: userid Filename: user/popup_modal.php Line Number: 208 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_modal.php Line: 208 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 478 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once "> Yes Cancel Continue Subscription Harry Potter Books × A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Undefined variable: products Filename: user/popup_harry_book.php Line Number: 24 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_harry_book.php Line: 24 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 479 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Warning Message: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() Filename: user/popup_harry_book.php Line Number: 24 Backtrace: File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/user/popup_harry_book.php Line: 24 Function: _error_handler File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/views/page/index.php Line: 479 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/application/controllers/Main.php Line: 107 Function: view File: /home/ah0ejbmyowku/public_html/index.php Line: 315 Function: require_once