User talk:Ramblersen2

Hi Ramblersen2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

You mentioned that you are annoyed by CAPTCHA (I suppose that's what you meant) and I've given your new account extended confirmed status. That should remove the CAPTCHA requirements. Hope this does the trick. Schwede66 21:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Carl Moresco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joakim Frederik Schouw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlottenborg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Danish Constituant Assembly. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 1848 Danish Constituent Assembly election. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 1848 Danish Constituent Assembly election. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cabayi (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ramblersen2, I can see that you have been putting a lot of work in to Carl Neergaard(s). I have changed the page Carl Neergaard to a redirect to Carl Neergaard (1800–1850), perhaps temporarily. Disambiguation pages are supposed to be a navigation guide to existing content, so red links with no associated blue-linked article are of no use to the reader (see MOS:DABRED). I couldn't find any blue links for the other Carls - Navigation School, Copenhagen never mentions Carl Neergaard. If you create articles for the other Carls, or add information about them to existing articles, then it would be appropriate to change Carl Neergaard back to a disambiguation page. Leschnei (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Falkensteen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falkensteen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A loose noose (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Luxdorph family, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Herman Jacob Bing.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 18:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Meyer Herman Bing.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 01:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Turebyholm.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Try to avoid having sections that entirely lack footnotes.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Budtz Müller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budtz Müller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Masum Reza^📞 13:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Niverød Brickworks, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 04:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I wanted to give you a bit more explanation for why I draftified this. I looked at the source in the article, and it doesn't support much of the information in the article. Also, with only a passing mention in a single source, the subject would not pass the notability guidelines at WP:GNG. It would be great if you could find some more reliable sourcing to support the assertions in this article, and to demonstrate the subject's notability. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 04:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Girth Summit: I based the article/stub on the article/stub on Danish Wikipedia as well as a bit of information from the related article on Lerbjerggaard Teglværk. I know that doesn't qualify as sources but I actually thaught that this approach was okay for stubs and would normally only result in a "more citations needed" or "multiple issues" tag? Wikipedia is at least full of stubs like that that aren't deleted. Either way, you are of course right that more references are needed and I will try to see what I can dig up. The article on Danish Wikipedia does not list any references either but I'm trying to find out where the information comes from (the creator has unfortunately not been active since January). The one reference I added was for the small piece of information that wasn't from the Danish Wikipedia article.Ramblersen2 (talk) 13:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll try to explain a bit more. I volunteer as part of the new pages patrol team. When a new article is created, it enters a queue for reviewers to look at. We check a few different things before marking the article as 'patrolled' - it needs to be in English, it needs enough content to identify the subject, it can't have any copyright violations, it can't be an 'attack page' - and also the subject needs to be notable. The article doesn't need to be extensively sourced, but the reviewer needs to be satisfied that the subject would meet one of the various notability criteria - the most basic one being WP:GNG, which essentially calls for the subject to be given significant coverage in at least two independent, reliable, secondary sources. When I come across a page such as your one, once I've checked it for copyvio etc., I next search for sources using Google - if I can find more sources, I usually add them to the article, but some reviewers (the extra-lazy ones!) just tag the article and move on, which is permitted - at least we know that the sources exist, and therefore the subject is notable, and hopefully someone will improve the tagged article at a later date. When I searched for the subject of your article however, I got no hits at all except for other Wikipedia pages - therefore, I could not establish the notability of the subject. That gives me a couple of options - I can nominate it for deletion either via WP:CSD, WP:PROD or WP:AfD, or I can 'draftify' it in the hope that the author can identify more sources. In your case, since the actual content was good, and I thought there might be offline sources (or indeed Danish-language sources that my searches were failing to find), I thought draftifying would be better than deletion. I hope that makes sense?

If you're interested in the decision-making process we go through when reviewing a page, you can see a flowchart at WP:NPP - hopefully you can see how I reached the draftify decision in this case, but I can walk you through it if you can't. If you can find a couple of Danish sources that give the subject significant coverage, I'd be happy to move the article back into article space and mark it as patrolled - just give me a ping and let me know you've done it. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 15:47, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pharmacies in Denmark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Eatchmakers (people) by country, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 03:06, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fuirendal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandved (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Ramblersen I have just been looking at Danish Asia Company and notice the references in the Danish Wiki article have not transferred. I can work through the list of ships and give references to Orlogmuseet database where available, but it might be better to pull your references to Klem through to the English article. Any thoughts on this? mvH Viking1808 (talk) 14:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viking1808: Feel free to go with whatevery solution you find best yourself. I will just be delighted to see any improvement of the article or its references. It is one of many articles/stubs that I have been wanting to go back to for ages but never really gotten round to.Ramblersen2 (talk) 18:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I will see what I can do over the next week or two. Viking1808 (talk) 06:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ramblerson More from me I'm afraid! Do you have access to the book that appears to be the source for the list of ships viz

• Knud Klem: Skibsbyggeriet i Danmark og Hertugdømmerne i 1700-årene; Bind I, København 1985; ISBN 87-88646-14-9 to confirm the listed references in the Danish version of this article.

The pdf article by Klem that does have a link does not have any ships listed, but looks a good 30-page article to study.
I came across a list of ships on-line this morning, but realised (and an administrator has pointed out) that it was a circular reference so not useable.
I suggest this discussion will better sit on the talk page of the English wikiarticle Danish Asia Company. Once on firmer ground, I have some material to give more details on these ships.

@Kuru: Thanks for the revert on this reference to Danish Asia Company. Any advice/help welcome Viking1808 (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Conrad Hauser, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Interstellarity: Why not simply tag this article with "more citationsneeded"? Conrad Hauser has a biography in the very authoritative Dansk Biografisk Leksikon (with a section entitled "Bibliografi" (Bibliography), containing more sources) and a wikipedia article in another language.Ramblersen2 (talk) 23:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hans Nielsen Jeppesen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Memel and Libau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Clement's Church, Bornholm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Stephen's Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramblersen2,

Thank you for creating Danasvej.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please try to fix the issues mentioned in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 13:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

:@Path slopu:: Thank you for your feedback on the Danasvej article. I must admit that I don't quite get why you see it as " a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic". Any chance you could be more specific about your concerns?Ramblersen2 (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of public art in Copenhagen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria Feodorovna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Reventlowsgade, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PrussianOwl (talk) 04:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ramblersen2! I removed the invalid URL here & was wondering if you knew where this file is located on the web. = paul2520 (talk) 16:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• user:paul2520: I can't really find the correct link either but I'll try to find another source. Thanks for drawing my attention to it.Ramblersen2 (talk) 16:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rahbels Allé Brewery, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 21:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Danish companies established in 1860 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramblersen2,

Thank you for creating Rahbels Allé Brewery.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, blogs and fandom are not reliable sources and need to be replaced with WP:Reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Danish Jewish musicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Victor Bendix, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before saving a change. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramblersen2,

Thank you for creating Johann Gottfried Grund.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 08:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kalkeballen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Puddleglum^2.0_{(How's my driving?)} 05:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Conrad Hauser, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ramblersen2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Neye (company) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vexations (talk) 23:03, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Here we get a lengthy list of there stores, but little to show notability such as number of employees, profit or turnover. Otherwise there's just a bit of history and we are told that they sell product assortments from a wide range of international brands and a collection of bags designed by Cecilie Talkum with inspiration from historic designs from the company's archives, was launched in October 2015
• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also write the article as a draft initially. You must also reply to the COI request above.

User:Jimfbleak: Fist of all, please remember to sign your comments on other people's talk pages. Furthermore, I must say that I am shocked to see this article deleted without further discussions. I asked what parts of the article that was found promotional. All you have written are some general rules that I am perfectly awar of, having created more than 2,500 articles. Now you also make comments about notability, a question that was not addressed in the initial nomination and that I therefore not commented on. The company is a more than 140 years old, well-known brand, it is the largest luggage retailer in Denmark, it is headquartered in a building by a notable architect on Denmark's most prominent shopping street, the company and its founder both have article on Danish Wikipedia, all the four references were from neutral sources. I asked what was promotional in the article and never got an answer. I never even got to comment on the notability. If Wikipedia has turned into a place where articles that someone has spent time on are just being deleted without observing the normal criteria for that, I am done with wikiepdia.Ramblersen2 (talk) 14:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramblersen2, to answer your reverted question, I did look at the deleted version. I can see elements of it that look promotional (mainly the "Locations" section, which seems to exist solely to direct people to the stores), but the rest did not look so bad to me as to merit G11. Please don't leave because of this experience. Take it to WP:DRV where it could be restored. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Muboshgu: To clarify, I added the location section because it was easy to add to get the article from a brief stub to a start-class article (plus such sections are found on many other pages about similar companies) and also to get a chance to add some links to other articles about streets and shopping centres. I did this since I thought it would improve integration between articles (not many articles link to them as it is) and not to promote anything (I don't see how linking to a street can promote a product). And where the company have shops is afterall still factual information and can as such in my opinion hardly be called "blatantly promotional". If it was wrong to include it, wouldn't it have been enough simply to delete that information or make it less specific? I don't see how it compromises the entire article and seeing the article deleted without any discussion whatsoever isn't exactly motivating. But thank you for taking the trouble of explaining even if it wasn't you I should have appealed to in the first place.Ramblersen2 (talk) 17:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jens Poul Andersen. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 08:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zinn House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caroline Henderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vestergade 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keystone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramblersen2,

Thank you for creating Overgaden Neden Vandet 39.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The lead claims that the building is "historic", but the History section does not make it clear why. Is it significant architecturally? Were particularly notable people residents of this place? Did something important take place here? If so, please emphasize these points in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GeneralPoxter}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that on some of your recent articles about Danish architecture and architectural sites, you write extensively on the personal lives of the inhabitants of these sites. I see no problem with a passing mention of a residence's occupation or renovations they have done to a the building. Although it seems unfit to write extensively about their children or grandchildren unless it relates to or contributes to the subject of the article itself. Besides that, the articles are excellent and very interesting.Ibn Daud (talk) 16:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)    [reply]

User:Ibn Daud: In a history section about a given building, I do find it relevant to write about notable former residents and companies that has been operated from the premises. In cases where a notable former resident has not (yet) got a biography on English Wikipedia, I do also find it relevant to mention why that specific resident was notable, especially if it provides links to existing articles (such as a newspaper he was editor of), but it should of course be as brief as possible. As for children, I believe I only mention them if they are themselves notable and having grown up in the building they are themselves former residents. As for grandchildren, they are of course only relevant if they took over the property after their father/grandfather as is the case with Aage Rostrup in the article on Valkendorfsgade 36. In other cases, I don't think I mention them but it may have happened to get an "easy" link to a biography with not that many articles linking to them (and they are afterall to some extent likely to have been part of the life that took place in the building). I will keep your comment in mind and try to be more focused with what information I add or at least more explicit abiout why it is relevant. No other reviewers have, however, raised similar concerns. If you have any specific problems with information I have added, now or in the future, I suggest that you raise your concerns on the relevant talk page, so that we can have a discussion about it and others can participate. Just deleting information that others have just added and find relevant could easily end up in unproductive edit wars. Ramblersen2 (talk) 16:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ramblersen2 I think you were still working on a translation at I. H. Rubens Fabrikker. The last sentence is still in Danish. I tried to figure out from the corresponding Danish article what you were going to say, but I can't figure it out. Can you have a look? Thanks, Vexations (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vexations: Done. Thank you for bringing my attention to it.Ramblersen2 (talk) 19:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramblersen2, sorry to be a pain, but there's still what I think is a date written as "10+1". Vexations (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Ramblersen. I'm happy to see that under your new user name, you're as active as ever on Wikipedia. I've been trying to tidy up the articles assigned to the wikiprojects for the Scandinavian countries and in this connection I noticed that many of your articles had not been assigned to WP Denmark. I've now been through all the missing ones and, with the help of ORES, have also provided assessments. If we take your two accounts, I see you have now created some 2,660 articles, over 80% of which are Start class or higher. Quite an achievement. And they are all so well presented, mostly with high-quality illustrations. You've certainly helped to put Denmark on the Wikipedia map. You might be interested to know that although both WP Norway and WP Sweden each have about twice as many articles, WP Denmark has a substantially better overall quality rating. Only 38% of the articles for WP Denmark are stubs, compared to 45% for WP Sweden and 53% for WP Norway. You've really been helping things along. Well done!--Ipigott (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: Thank you for the kind words and for creating and updating all those assessment pages. That sounds like some (yet another) massive job here on Wikipedia that you have engaged in! Now that you are here, may I ask if you are planning at some point to write an article about Tegneskolen for Kvinder (Source)? With all you work on women bios and your previous work on Carl Nielsen and the Lolland-Dalster-Møn area, I have also been wondering if you would be interested in covering Bodil Neergaard of Fuglsang Manor?Ramblersen2 (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those look like good suggestions. I'll look into them more closely when I have time. If ever you come across similar topics which need to be covered, just drop me a line.--Ipigott (talk) 06:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thnak you. I added a few names to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by nationality#Denmark list some time back (Bodil de Neergaard was one of them), some of them may interest you.Ramblersen2 (talk) 09:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for these too — I'll try to work through them. I also noticed some potentially interesting red links in Weekendavisen Book Award and N. L. Høyen Medal. Always plenty to work on!--Ipigott (talk) 09:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I've been putting something together on Tegne- og Kunstindustriskolen for Kvinder (please expand as you wish) but now it looks as if I'll have to create a biography for Charlotte Klein.--Ipigott (talk) 14:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: It looks great! But yes that is the thing with red links: For each of them that is eliminated, five new ones seem to pop up. I can see that KADK website seems to state something else but Kleibn's building on H. C. Andersens Boulevard was not built until 1880-81 (Source). Another small detail that should perhaps be included (if a proper source can be found) is that the Danish Wikipedia article about the school mentions that it was from 1888 recognized as a prepatory school for the Toyal Art Academy's new Art School for Women.Ramblersen2 (talk) 15:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for these details. I had also seen other sources with the date of 1880 for the building. I'll try to get back to it tomorrow if you have not beaten me to it.--Ipigott (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I've also been developing Bodil Neergaard. Thanks for uploading the portrait.--Ipigott (talk) 13:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your additions to both Tegneskolen and Bodil Neergaard. I see both articles have attracted above average page views in the short time they have been accessible.--Ipigott (talk) 10:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: I was wondering if the Bodil Neergaard biography should be included in the Carl Nielsen nav bar and if the Carl Nielsen nav bar should be placed on the page or if the connection between them is too weak, what do you think?

I think we would first need to expand a bit on Nielsen's associations with Fuglsang and Neergaard. Just as much could probably be written about the associations with Grieg. The Nielsen and Grieg biographies could also be expanded to contain more details if they are sufficiently important. But I'll leave it to you if you think it's important enough without further work.--Ipigott (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• On Tegneskolen, could you fix the error in the box and also add refs to the source(s) you have used for the architectural details. You might also like to look at Charlotte Klein which I'm still developing. Rather busy with many other things today.--Ipigott (talk) 09:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Box looks OK now. Can't remember what the problem was but it was full of a red-lettered warning in edit preview a few minutes ago.--Ipigott (talk) 09:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: That sounds like an "Unknown parameter" problem, strange that it suddenly shoiwed up and then dissappeared by itself. I have tried to add the few sources I can find to the architecture section. Some of the information is based on observation (cf. the images), feel free to delete or modify it to the extent that you find it necessary. The Charlotte Klein article looks good.Ramblersen2 (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been adding more names to the redlist. Sooner or later I'll try to get back to them but I need to work on other things at the moment. If you're not completely tied up with architecture and male biographies, you might like to make a start on some of them yourself. There are many, many more on the Wikidata Denmark list. Maybe you can let us know which ones you think are most deserving of articles in English by adding them to the crowd-sourced list.--Ipigott (talk) 13:51, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: Thank you for creating the Ørsted and Suhr articles. I would like to stress that I never meant to burden you with the adding of those extra names but simply intended them as my (sometimes subjective) contribution to highlighting some names that could deserve a biography, that you or someone elsem now or later, might want to look into to see if they also found them interesting. I am pretty tied up with building and topography related articles (still several thousand listed buildings to go). When it comes to biographies, I mainly create them if they come up as red links on my other articles. And my plan is to spend more time on improving existing biographies (especially the most notaible Danish architects from each period), rather than creating new ones. I don't really destinguish between gender but when it comes to WikiProject Denmar, I must say that the coverage of women (thanks to you and the Women in Red initiative in general) seems a lot better than that of men and is also progressing a lot faster. The impact that it has had is really impressive!Ramblersen2 (talk) 16:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jørgen Hansen Koch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Assens and Ladegården (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Ramblersen - Many thanks for the new image on Diderich de Thurah. I particularly like the philosophical verse beneath. Perhaps in your travels round Copenhagen, you might be able to find one of the portraits of Admiral F C Kaas listed at Talk:Frederik Christian Kaas (1725–1803) in a form that could be uploaded. Only if it interests you, of course. Tak Viking1808 (talk) 13:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viking1808: I have uploaded an image of him but am unfortunately not sure which one of the pictures it is. I couldn't find any of the paintings in the Frederiksborg Museum in their image database.Ramblersen2 (talk) 23:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was quick! Many thanks. Viking1808 (talk) 08:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bolette Puggaard (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mcampany (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the articles on the Danish women you have recommended have had a fair viewing. I can't imagine why but Sigrid Kähler has only been viewed five times, no doubt by reviewers of new articles. Maybe you could use your magic touch to create more interest.--Ipigott (talk) 12:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: It says 175 page views of which 166 was on the first day when I check it now. I will try to add some more links to see if that helps a bit as well. The extra reference that I have added from gravsted.dk says that she died from lung cancer and not tuberculosis, I have no idea which one is correct. I I have by the way stumbled over this article about Kvindelige Kunstneres Sammenslutning - founded back in 1895 by Marie Henriques, Helvig Kinch and Anne Marie Carl-Nielsen among others - and some of its members' efforts to digitalize its archives. I don't know if it has any interest.Ramblersen2 (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you see 175? I only see five under Sigrid Kähler + View History + Pageviews. But thanks anyway for your additions. I've made a start on Emilie Sannom but I'm afraid the others you have listed seem to lack notability, especially for English speakers. Let's see if anyone else picks them up.--Ipigott (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for "De henter kvindelige kunstnere ud af glemslen". I'll have a more careful look at it when I have time.--Ipigott (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make a start on Helvig Kinch tomorrow. Looks interesting.--Ipigott (talk) 15:42, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: I see the 175 page views here.Ramblersen2 (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked a bit more carefully at your page view tool. It seems to me that it includes all types of access, including editing, checking updates, etc., rather than genuine interest by users of the encyclopaedia. I see all the other recent articles respond in much the same way. I think the standard page views (also used for checking response to DYKs) is a more reasonable method of showing how much interest is shown in new articles. In any case, your new edits on Kåhler brought the standard page views up to 33 -- certainly a lot better than 5!--Ipigott (talk) 08:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: I see. Thank you for bringing my attention to this error in the settings I have usedRamblersen2 (talk) 08:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bing & Grøndahl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kai Nielsen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Conrad Hauser, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware you never actually submitted it, but it seems to me sufficiently complete for mainspace. If this is a problem for you, pls let me know at my talk p. ``

Please check. Need clarification in Today section. Thank you. --LilHelpa (talk) 23:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, N. B. Clemmensen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Martin Nyrop buioldings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Høsterkøb Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

uncertain notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 09:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Danish mechanicians has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the basis of Signe Krogstrup is appointed as a new member of Danmarks Nationalbank's Board of Governors, I think she deserves an article. As you probably know there are only three governors. I can't do it as I have personal connections. It seems to me to be quite an achievement that a woman should receive such an appointment when she is only 48. I see we have quite a nice article on Bodil Nyboe Andersen which may inspire you.--Ipigott (talk) 10:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipigott: It most certainly is. I'll see what I can do later today.Ramblersen2 (talk) 10:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Gouses in Vordingborg Municipality requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramblersen2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reventlowsgade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Ramblerson

May I ask for your help again? My latest article Ulrich Kaas (1677 - 1746) has the admiral's house in Copenhagen destroyed by fire in November 1728. The geni.com reference mentions Ølufsgaard which appears to be out in Amager (Olufsgård 2 A, Sirgræsvej, Kastrup, Denmark), but whether this was where the fire was I do not know. With your encyclopaedic knowledge of Copenhagen, can you find out??
Also I was initially confused between Herlev and Nørre Herlev, the latter being nearer Hillerød and his estate at Sandsvigsgaard - again, from my home, I cannot find Sandvigsgaard. The Geni website above seems equally confused (or is it?) preferring the northwest corner of Bornholm!
I hope these puzzles will interest you. Viking1808 (talk) 17:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viking1808:Looks like another great article you made there!

• • He owned Ølufsgaard in South Jutland from 1719 to 1741.
  • Sandviggaard at Hillerød was brought into the marriage by Kaas' second wife. Source: Historien om Sandviggaard by Lennart Weber (2016)now included as a note - Viking1808 (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Filmhusene has been built on its former land.[reply]
  • I can't find the location of his former townhouse in Copenhagen. I do see that the source mentions "November" but I assume that it was destroyed in the Copenhagen Fire of 1728 a few days earlier. now included as a possibility Viking1808 (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)I will keep an eye out for more detailed information on its location.[reply]
  • It may also interest you that Ulrik (Ulrich) Kaas and Johan Cornelius Krieger established a combined lime kiln and sawmill in Christianshavn (source). His second and third sons were both born in Christianshavn, so that seems also to have been where he lived after the fire. If I am right that the old house was destroyed in the Copenhagen Fire of 1728, he didn't live there before the fire since Christianshavn wasn't affected by it. His first son died in Østergade in 1804, so a wild guess could be that this was also where Kaas house was located (in case it was rebuilt and passed down to his eldest son) but since Kaas moved to Bergen such a short time thereafter it doesn't seem very likely.Ramblersen2 (talk) 18:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Mange tak! There is a lot there to digest. I must have driven past Ølufgaard a few times from Ribe to Varde. Thanks again Viking1808 (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viking1808: :We could btw really use an article on the Danish Admiralty (cf. British Admiralty). With you interest in and great knowledge of maritime and navel affairs, would it be an article that you would be interested in starting at some point? Otherwise I may give it a go but I really don't know much about it.Ramblersen2 (talk) 19:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First - let me correct a piece of English. NAVEL is the Danish NAVLE, the English NAVAL is the Danish ORLOG. It is a slip you often make! Sorry.

Second - there is a lot of information already in Orlogsværftet and Danish Shipbuilders, plus a lot to be taken from The Royal Danish Naval Museum in English or Danish. I will think about such a "Danish Admiralty" article, but it might be better if you start one in your fashion and I come in later ?? I will put some thought into it.

Third - My original question plus your reply to it might fit better at the talk page of Ulrich Kaas (1677 - 1746). Once the article settles down, I (or you) might consider moving the discussion to the articles talk page. AND - for true Danes only - I see the Danish version da:Ulrik Kaas has anotice on it asking for a rewrite. My written Danish is very poor for such an enterprise. Viking1808 (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ramblersen2

Again, I am a little confused although you may be right here! You have just placed a new picture on the Danish-Wikipedia article of da:Ulrik Christian Kaas. Compare this with the picture on English-Wikipedia for Frederick Christian Kaas, his brother. They appear to be the same, so one is presumably wrong. Also on the Ulrich Christian Kaas' Danish page is the statement, without source,

Maleriet af Peder Als, som tidligere er blevet angivet til at forestille Kaas, er i virkeligheden et portræt af broderen F.C. Kaas. 

The reason I spotted this is that I am (very slowly) getting an article together on my User:Viking1808/Sandbox2 for Ulrich Christian K.
Can you keep me straight? Viking1808 (talk) 10:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viking1808: I do see that it is the same picture. My source is this one and it does state that it is Ulrik Christian Kaas (1729-1808). I tried to consult the Frederiksborg Museum's online image database but its search function is unfortunately for some obscure reason absolutely useless (it is a problem I have had before) and I therefore didn't get any results at all for "Ulrik Kaas", "Kaas" or "Frederik Kaas". You should perhaps also give it a try to see if it is only me or my computer that it fails to work for. I gues thecomment from the Danish article that you quote omdicates that it is my source that is wrong. Dansk Biografisk Leksikon does not seem to mention the portrait either (under "Ikonografi") under Ulrik Christian Kaas and I guess that is another indication that it is in fact not him (that they should have missed a portrait in a public collection seems unlikely).Ramblersen2 (talk) 13:22, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will keep looking. Deeper in your source (reventlow) is another picture which they identify as frederik christian Kaas (kaas_frederik_christian_12724.jpg) - the one born 1727 which I have already used on the article for Frederik Christian Kaas (1725–1803). Tricky folk, these Kaas admirals. Do we really trust the reventlow website??

Viking1808 (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Viking1808 (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viking1808: Talking about the Kaas family; in your article on Frederik Christian Kaas (1725–1803), you write that he is buried in the cemetery of Fraugde Church. He is infact buried in a burial chapel (or whatever a "gravkapel" is called in English) inside the church. I have uploaded some pictures of it as well as his and his wife's sarcofages and some inventory that he donated to the church. You my want to make some adjustments and perhaps make your own decision on what image)s) to use.Ramblersen2 (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ulrik Christian Kaas (1729 - 1808) is now open for comment! Instead of a portrait, I have used the Mur Kaas coat-of-arms. If your researches can find a properly documented portrait of this Ulrik it will be much appreciated. The reference Rosenkamp -Dansk Biografisk Lexikon - Ulrik Christian Kaas page 300 appears to be the source for the claim on Danish Wiki that Ulrik's portrait is really that of his brother Frederik. Viking1808 (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viking1808: He has according to Dansk Biografisk Leksikon only been depicted twice. One of these is a drawing by W. Haffner from 1781 in Rosenborg Castle. I think it may be one of the drawings by him seen here, so I guess it is impossible to identify the detail with him on it and that it would be too small to be useful anyway. The other one is a 1794 painting of a "royal party" which is now in the holdings of Jægerspris Castle. There is a 1794 drawing in Jægerspris Castle here but I guess it is not the one they are referring to since its a drawing and not a painting. And I guess he will again be too small and hard to identify anyway.

Is it btw on purpose that you ended up not mentioning Ølufgaard in your article on Ulrich Kaas (1677 - 1746) or did it simply slip your mind? And you may btw want to move the article to Ulrich Kaas (1677–1746) (unless I have misunderstood something) since a simple year–year range is written using an unspaced ndash.Ramblersen2 (talk) 12:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ramblersen - OK, no portrait of Ulrik C Kaas. thanks for trying.
Regarding his father I have not found anything to "hang my hat on" regarding Ølufgaard. There is no such article on English or Danish wikipedia to link to - perhaps just a hint (in the Ølufgaard site) that he was in severe need of money (til 1741, hvor den måtte gå på tvangsauktion.) in 1741 which may have been a continuation of his money troubles of 1732. If there was more evidence of his need for money then I would jump at it. Perhaps you, or another editor, can come up with the evidence and a good paragraph.

I will leave the matter of style to others. mvH. Viking1808 (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramblersen2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "N. B. Clemmensen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tanzanian emigrants to Denmark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rosenvinge family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This category duplicates the list article Rosenvinge. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ziegler House, Copenhagen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinaman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Danish Scientific illustrators requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ramblersen2: Can you have a look at a new article Rammegaard which I created to give another link to our Wigelsen. It uses a lot of information from the DANSKE HERREGÅRDE website, but is still really just a stub. What do you think? Viking1808 (talk) 16:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viking1808: I have added some bits and pieces but have unfortunately not found am uploadable image of the main building.Ramblersen2 (talk) 06:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[