User talk:TimeEngineer

States of emergency in Canada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:15, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Green Party of Canada leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MD. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cynthia Reyes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

The article topic is Ontario municipal awards in general but none of the sources discuss the topic as a whole - they're all about specific types of municipal awards. Therefore there's no indication that "Ontario municipal awards" is a coherent concept. If there were articles for each of these awards, this might be a valid list article as it would serve a navigational purpose, but the only award with an article is the Order of Hamilton.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Municipal Awards (Ontario) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Municipal Awards (Ontario), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 23:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spicy (talk) 23:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time.

Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Green Party of Canada leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It's not clear there is a particular organization that has trademarked or claimed "Friends of".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Friends of (Charitable Organization) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Friends of (Charitable Organization), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @AngusWOOF: . Thanks for reviewing it. There are thousands of organizations that use the "Friends of" moniker

This is just the first export from the Canadian Revenue Agency's list of charities, searching for "Canadian Friends of". As such, I don't think that its a neologism. Also, this article is intended to discuss organizations like this as a whole, not one specific one. Would you recommend a different title?

I see your point on sources, and will work to find more. TimeEngineer (talk) 18:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TimeEngineer, it's more whether there is an overall "Canadian Friends of" organization that has claimed trademark of that phrase so only members of that organization can use it. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See 501(c)(3) organization for example, mentions this term "friends of". AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. There isn't an overall organization, but its a common and long used term that I believe would do well to be defined in an article. TimeEngineer (talk) 18:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Time Engineer. I notice that mostly you do not supply edit summaries with your edits. Edit summaries are very helpful to other Users who monitor articles that you have worked on. Please read Always provide an edit summary. Thank you. Dolphin (t) 21:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tarahan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough coverage to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Municipal Awards (Ontario), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 06:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cynthia Reyes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited McMaster Faculty of Engineering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fusion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Municipal Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nada Jabado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nada Jabado, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Friends of".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of executive actions by John Quincy Adams—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC) Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/TTC right/Ontario Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/TTC left/Ontario Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barcelona International Public Policy Hub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barcelona International Public Policy Hub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 20:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Tighe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provost.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kim Baines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kpgjhpjm 09:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Cornelia Bohne. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mcampany (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, TimeEngineer, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you have already created several women's biographies and now intend to add more. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look at our essays, especially the Primer. Perhaps you would also like to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to see your interest. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2023[edit]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276 Online events: New: Women in Red's 8th anniversary | Alphabet run A & B | Sports Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Look out for contributors interested in writing about women and invite them to join Women in Red Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 10:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Women in Red 8th Anniversary
	In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280 Online events: New: Alphabet run C & D | Indigenous women | Film and stage | Geofocus: Arab League Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region. Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi there, TimeEngineer. I see you have removed the WiR user box from your user page although you continue to state your interest in the project. Maybe you just want me to delete you name from our mailing list so that you do not receive our monthly priorities, etc. In any case, please continue your useful work on creating articles about women.--Ipigott (talk) 08:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Order of Hamilton, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Celtic nations Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Women in STEM | Geofocus: Sub-Saharan Africa Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon Tip of the month: When creating an article, check to see if there is an entry in the sister project Wikidata. If your subject is listed, the Wikidata information can be useful Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page St. John Ambulance Canada, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289 Online events: New: Alphabet run I & J | Geofocus: Indian subcontinent | Women in Politics Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest Tip of the month: When translating articles from another language Wikipedia, don't forget to include attribution in your first edit summary. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Please stop messaging me about WiR. It feels like spam. TimeEngineer (talk) 09:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Corby Spirit and Wine, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Next Israeli legislative election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2013 Regina wastewater plant financing referendum, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292 Online events: New: Alphabet run K & L | Women who died in 2023 | Honoured Women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Avoid copyright problems by rewriting in your own words. You can check any article or draft with Earwig's copyvio detector. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yahya Al-Sarraj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. Thank you for your work on Yahya Al-Sarraj. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. Thank you for your work on Israeli–Lebanese land border dispute. IgnatiusofLondon, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Thank you for your excellent work at Israeli–Lebanese land border dispute. An existing article on Wikipedia, Blue Line (withdrawal line), already provides considerable coverage of this topic area. Please merge the page history from Israeli–Lebanese land border dispute into Blue Line (withdrawal line). Thank you, and happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|IgnatiusofLondon}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 13:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Boustane. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Line (withdrawal line), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosh HaNikra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the 1RR at Attacks on Palestinians evacuating Gaza City, please self-revert your latest revert or you may be reported. nableezy - 18:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you not going to self-revert? nableezy - 19:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nableezy Why would I self revert when 1RR states that 1 revert may be done in a day? I did 1 revert. Now that my revert has itself been reverted (with 1RR as the rationale, which seems nonsensical) I will now proceed to the talk page to discuss the issue.

Maybe my understanding of "you may only do 1 revert every 24 hours" is incorrect, but it seems very clear. TimeEngineer (talk) 19:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your initial removal of material was also a revert. Any edit that reverses, in whole or in part, another user's addition is a revert. nableezy - 19:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nableezy That goes against the clear text of WP:RV. It says that while any edit is technically a revert, the word's use in wikipedia is an edit that removes the entirety of someones contribution.

My first edit was because that line's contents wasn't reflected in the sources it cited. That was an edit to the page, not the revert of someone else's edit (at least I didn't check to make sure that the sentence hadn't been added as a single edit and left unchanged over the last 3 months, which is an unreasonable standard.) TimeEngineer (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EW: The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period. ... The term "revert" is defined as any edit (or administrative action) that reverses or undoes the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, Unless you think my initial removal was also not a revert? nableezy - 20:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nableezy I personally wouldn't call it a revert. I'd call it an edit. TimeEngineer (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, Ive always approached any removal as a revert by default. Anyway, Id be glad to discuss the content on the talk page so we can come to some sort of consensus on what the article should say. nableezy - 20:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the word's use in wikipedia is an edit that removes the entirety of someones contribution.

I just wanted to comment to say that this understanding isn't correct; the definition is An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

However, it is not a revert to remove content that has become the status quo - there is no clear definition of when content becomes the status quo and I've seen arguments for anything from a couple of days to a year, but I would suggest at least three months to be safe. BilledMammal (talk) 21:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

nableezy - 19:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re Talk:2024 Jerusalem mayoral election -- per WP:CLOSE, do not supervote by using a discussion close to impose your opinion on the process, and certainly do not close discussions where you were yourself the one who opened them. jp×g🗯️ 18:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cornelia Bohne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimeEngineer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cornelia Bohne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]